Animal Testing Argument Essay

The use of animals in research has created a diverse range of attitudes, as some individuals support the use of animal testing and others are against it. Sometimes people do not have enough background knowledge on this topic to be involved in a discussion. Animal testing dates back to around 400 years ago, when one of the first famous researchers William Harvey was curious to discover how blood circulates around the body. The modern era of animal testing began around 150 years ago, although the conditions were quite different; the animals suffered severely as there were no anesthetics (Understanding Animal Research 2013).
Animal testing has contributed to many lifesaving cures and treatments. The Government of Australia’s Animal Welfare Committee

Recent developments and breakthroughs on animal testing have changed the way society now lives (Malin 2014). In the 1910s blood transfusions were discovered, blood transfusions can save a patient’s life and limit severe blood loss during surgery, bunny rabbits were tested on in order for the discovery. In the 1930s anesthetics were discovered while testing on guinea pigs, an anesthetic is an injection, which causes the loss of sensation and pain. In the 2000s the cervical cancer vaccine was introduced, cervical cancer is a nasty type of cancer that is usually incurable when diagnosed (Malin 2014). A survey put forward by Malin (2014) has stated, critically ill patients suffering from chronic diseases who are in need of medical support or breakthroughs show a positive stance towards animal testing, comparing to the general public who are against it. The patients that were interviewed stated that they have had great improvements in their health due to scientific progress on animal testing, but at the same time there have been many failures, animal testing has caused to patients (Malin 2014). Malin (2014) states that patients with chronic diseases are more willing to sacrifice themselves to test possible breakthroughs in

Society is now beginning to see the positive impacts of medical research on animals. These impacts include, medical breakthroughs and cures for diseases (Corwin 1999). However, as Corwin (1999) states there is still concern for animal testing, woman are more likely to express concern for animal research than men. Suggesting gender comes into consideration with beliefs relating to animals in research. Corwin (1999) states that men are more likely to support the use of animal testing than women do, as men lack affection. Comparing to women, they consistently express affection towards animals and concern for ethical relations (Corwin 1999). This research put forward by Corwin (1999) relates to the previous research by Schuppli (2014), as they both state women are affectionate compared to