Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Globalization: Global corruption
Effects of global corruption
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Globalization: Global corruption
Does international trade increase or decrease corruption?
Challenging corruption has recently become one of the main priorities in a number of countries around the globe. Mainly because the negative effects of corruption have been widely recognized in practice and by the academics. The adverse effects of corruption vary; in developed countries corruption is relatively curbed; however in the underdeveloped world corruption usually accounts for enormous amount of the Gross National Product. There are a number of different approaches to fighting corruption as well as there are different causes of it. This essay paper argues openness to international trade has a positive effect in decreasing political corruption. Deriving from neoliberal ideas, international trade widens the scope of free market which results in less substantive powers for the government officials. Corruption flourishes when there is lack of perfect competition in the bureaucracy; monopoly power among officials is combined with discretional powers and low accountability. Another argument discussed in this paper favours the idea of reducing corruption by lowering tariff rates for international trade. An empirical study is being presented which analyses the correlation between corruption and import shares.
Transparency International accounts corruption as the abuse of the ones entrusted with power for private gain. Corruption negatively affects everyone whose life, livelihood or general happiness depends on the integrity of people in a position of authority. Corrupt activities hold back economic development, prevent the conditions free market and equal opportunities for businesses and consumers as well as exploits already marginalised groups of people. In some cases, s...
... middle of paper ...
... American Economic Review. 89 (4), 1.
Bonaglia, F., de Macedo, J. and Bussolo, M. (2001). How Globalization Improves Governance. OECD Development Centre, Working Paper No. 181. 181 (1).
Gatti, R. (2004). Explaining Corruption: Are Open Countries Less Corrupt? Journal of International Development. 16 (1).
Gerring, J. and Thacker, S. C. (2005). Do Neoliberal Policies Deter Political Corruption?. International Organization. 59 (1), 1.
Larrain, F. and Tavaranes, J. (2000). Can Openness Deter Corruption?. CEPR Discussion Pape. DP6488 . 1 (1), 1.
Mandal, B. and Marjit, S. (2013). Trade reform, intermediation and corruption. Economic Modelling. 33 (1), 1.
Haur Tang, S. (2011). Corruption and International Trade: An Empirical Study on Large East Asian Newly Industrializing Countries and Comparative Politics of Corruption. The UCLA Undergraduate Journal of Economics. 1 (1).
By the mid 20th century, the scale and prominence of corruption had increased dramatically, due to the widespread transition to vast urban cities and industrialized systems. The greed and desperation that resulted from the shift towards industrialism accelerated the growth of corruption in politics. Although the shift to industry was a necessary stepping stone in the development of the modern society existing today, it was accompanied by various consequences to American society and facilitated the corruption of government officials. The exploitation of fellow
Corruption is defined as the dishonest conduct one performs for illegitimate private gain (Paskal). To determine where corruption
Corruption is a persistent problem that plagues the world and it knows no boundaries. Transparency International defines it as the “abuse of entrusted power for private gain” (2013). For the purposes of this thread, ‘corruption’ is defined as any individual, collective, or structural act or process that permits the use of public authority or position for private gain. This definition captures the broad and many ways individuals and institutions abuse power and the public trust. In regard to whistleblowing, much conflict stems from the context in which the whistleblower is viewed.
Probable Causes of Corruption – Different things motivate different people. Some can motivate people to perform beyond expectations and some can lead astray from moral and ethical values.
The discernments provided in this book by a distinguished ‘insider’ is manna for economists, investment banks, governments of both developing and developed countries and just about anybody who wants to learn and understand economic development, the politics of international business and globalization, and public policy formulation with regards to globalization and liberalization. The author provides a holistic view of all aspects of globalization – the good, the bad, and the ugly. International organizations and business practitioners in particular will be wise to glean valuable insights from this book.
Valaskakis, K. (1998). The challenge of strategic governance: Can globalization be managed? Optimum, vol. 28, no. 2, pp. 26-40.
Corruption consists in the illegitimate agreement between a corruptor and a corrupted, in which they abuse of their public power in order to obtain personal benefit. Bribery and corruption is something that has been going on for years. According to Allen, “officials perceive themselves as immune to any penalties for demanding and receiving bribes” which she states that it is one of the main reasons for bribery and corruption in underdeveloped countries. According to Transparency International, an organization committed exclusively to end corruption, three of the most corrupt countries in the world are Somalia, North Korea and Afghanistan. This does not mean that corruption is only seen in underdeveloped countries. In international business, corporate employees often find themselves dealing with corruptors in foreign countries and, in most cases, they will give in.
The runaway corruption in the country harms the business environment and causes collapse of various established institutions and industries.
The UN Convention against Corruption (UNCAC) (UN General Assembly 2003) is the first international attempt to establish a standard of anti-corruption policy in order to reduce problems related to corruption (Hechler et al. 2011) like an adverse impact on economic growth (Mauro 2004). In spite the fact that the approach of UNCAC is based on large empirical evidence about the causes of corruption (Judge, McNatt, and Xu 2011) corruption remains in some countries a persistent problem (Hechler et al. 2011). A ex ante analysis by Hechler et al. (2011) identified the lack implementation as one of the major pitfalls of the UNCAC and this essay seeks to find a theoretical explanation by drawing on the literature of policy diffusion, which applies for UNCAC as the policy choices of signing countries affect the policy choices of other countries (Meseguer 2006). This constitutes an interesting case for testing the assumptions of the two main mechanism identified by Gilardi (2003), who distinguishes between mechanisms of diffusion focused on rational problem-solving or symbolic purposes (Meseguer 2006). However, this essay narrows the field of possible answers by arguing that the concept of rational learning (Meseguer 2006) does not apply and therefore advocates a critical assessment of the underlying premise of mimetic isomorphism that countries imitate each other but are more concerned about legitimacy rather than functional efficiency (Hall and Taylor 1996). Testing mimetic isomorphism against the implementation process of UNCAC will highlight under which conditions the theoretical framework is more likely to explain the outcome of anti-corruption policy. This may yield key insights on the antecedents of failure in decreasing...
Tussie, D., & Aggio, C. (n.d.). Economic and social impacts of trade liberalization. Retrieved from http://www.unctad.info/upload/TAB/docs/TechCooperation/fullreport-version14nov-p106-119.pdf
Globalization, love it or hate it, but you can’t escape it. Globalization may be regarded as beneficial from an economic and business point of view, but however cannot be perceived the ditto when examined from the social sciences and humanities side of it. Globalization can be argued as a tool for economic growth, advancement and prosperity through co-operation between the developed and developing countries. The pro-globalization critics argue that the benefits that globalization brings to developing nations surpasses or outcasts the negative impacts caused by globalization and may even go a step further to state that it is the only source of hope for developing nations to prosper and stand out. However, the real question to be asked is as to what extent are the positives argued upon without taking into account the negative aspects of globalization towards developing countries. Moreover, how many developing countries out of many are exactly benefiting or even prospering from globalization is another question to consider. Therefore, my paper will dispute that indeed growth and advancement provided by globalization to developing countries is beneficial in short-term, but in the long-run, it will only bring upon negative impacts and challenges due to the obstacles involved such as exploitation of labour and resources, higher increase in poverty, and effects of multi-national corporations on local businesses and the economy, and to an extent the effects on the developing country itself.
Kearney, A.T. (2001). Corruption and the Globalization Index. Last access on 27 March 2005 at URL: http://www.globalcorruptionreport.org/download/gcr2001/data_and_research.pdf NAIM, Mois´s (1995). Corruption Eruption. Last accessed on 2 April 2005 at URL: http://www.carnegieendowment.org/publications/index.cfm?fa=view&id=648 MORAN, Robert T. and RIESENBERGER, John R. (1994)
Krain, Matthew (2005), “AP Comparative Government and Politics Briefing Paper: Globalization,” [http://apcentral.collegeboard.com/apc/public/repository/ap05_comp_govpol_glob_42253.pdf], accessed 15 May 2012.
In this essay,we have seen evidence that corruption leads to instability in the economy,increases the transactional cost,decreases efficiency, hinders the growth of a healthy marketplace and harms the social and economic development.Therefore,it’s fair to say that Corruption has had a serious effect on the Indian Economy.If left unchecked,India is bound to lose FDI investments as investors will lose trust in the economy. “Lost opportunities caused by corruption in regards to growth,jobs and investment; India has lost up to $45-50 billion a year”(Singh 2010).
Montesh, M. (n.d.). Conceptualizing Corruption: Forms, Causes, Types and Consequences. Retrieved May 4, 2014, from