More handpicked essays just for you.
An article on the impact of media on people's lives
An article on the impact of media on people's lives
The media and its influence on individuals and society
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: An article on the impact of media on people's lives
Topic: Famous people are treated unfairly by the media. Should they be given more privacy?
The fame in the world is a big issue to decrease the private lives and it generates an invasion in one’s private life. In many cases, famous people are treated unfairly by the media. How would you feel if you were a superstar and some person randomly walks in and take pictures of you when you just wake up? Would you like it if people interfere in your private life or would it be something that would affect you or hold you back?
Famous people should be given more privacy by the media as they are too humans and they need to be in a private for some reasons. According to Shoai (2012), the constant attention given to famous people make their personal lives get over exposed and they are brought to public more often than they want. Shoai (2012) contends that media negative role destroys the celebrities’ live and famous people are always followed by media. There is a thin line between a celebrity’s private life and professional life when the media tries to expose his or her private life, and this ac...
When considering the issue of celebrities receiving unfair treatment by making their punishment worse than a regular persons is totally un orthodox so it is essential to know that their regular too. Also all people don’t know what rules they are violating or what rules they need to know so they won’t violate them. All people aren’t guilty neither are they all innocent but they should suffer equal consequences.
Marshall P. David (1997). Celebrity Power; Fame in Contemporary Culture. May 16, 2010. Electronically retrieved from
...uld be justifiable to emphasize that a good number of them find it sickening to miss the limelight. . Nonetheless, it goes without mentioning that celebrities get exploited because some gossip stories explore the things that would otherwise be considered to be private.
After observing and researching all the sources portraying celebrities I have came into a conclusion that todays society it seems like all we want is to be accepted and we tend to look at other people and judge. Its not right, we all are different and thats what makes the world go round. It would be a pretty boring world if we were all the same. Celebrities deal with this everyday, I think the paparazzi know more about some celebrities lives than they actually do. They judge them for who they are and what they do, it is not right nor fair.
A celebrity is not a person known for his/her talent or achievement, but an individual recognized for his/her reputation created by the media. The phase of stardom is slippery, and media may choose to represent celebrities varying from exaggerated admiration to mockery. The three texts chosen, movie "Sunset Boulevard", feature article "Over the Hilton" and television show "Celebrity Uncensored Six" are texts presenting different perception of celebrities than their usual images - either corrupted by the encircling media, overloads oneself with self-indulgence, or just mocks celebrity in a broad spectrum. Such media items empower and impresses the audience by perceiving celebrities as people who pay the price of privacy to gain well knowness, signifying the vanity of stardom from the commonly accepted images.
Does the public have a right to know everything about a public figure’s life? If you turn on your television the primetime program will have lots of news about celebrities. By the time you have to pay at the register at the supermarket, you can appreciate your favorite public star on the cover of a magazine, or if you open up a new window on the internet browser a celebrity gadget will appear at the beginning. It is irresistible not to read about personal lives of the various famous people with pictures, or watch what is happening on the showbiz. In fact, if makes entertainment for a while from others people boring time.
Photographing an individual whether famous or not in public will not violate that person’s privacy under the laws in most countries. Assuming the paparazzi isn’t assaulting someone or trespassing or otherwise doing something illegal while taking such a picture, he or she will not be violating the law. Public figures do not ask for a total invasion of their privitness .Few of us lead lives that are not classified into a newsworthy. Just because these people contribute to their profession in front of the world, it does not mean that they should be denied the right to privacy and respect. Therefore Paparazzi should be banned from exposing people’s private lives, any way they want.
When it comes to the topic of the celebrities lives being off the media, most of us will readily agree that celebrities’ lives should be kept private. Where this agreement usually ends, however is on the question of if their lives should not be kept private and be off limits to the media. Whereas some are convinced that celebrities have the right of privacy and media should be off limits to the media, others maintain that the private lives of the celebrities should not be private because it gives jobs to the media on what was is going on in their lives and keeping the public entertained. As for me, I agree and disagree with the lives of celebrities should be off limits to the media because, as recent research has shown that there is ways for
Stints as a child model and commercial actress brought Lohan into the spotlight at the age of three. As she transitioned from childhood to adulthood, it was becoming much more difficult to make such an appearance in the media that she had as a child. “The mass-media sets the public agenda; they are the ones who, as a result of their social event selection and focusing system, assign the priority of the discussion topics on the agenda” (Pachef, 2010). Thus, everything she had done in her personal life the media had documented, making sure the public masses were aware of Lohan. From her drug abuse to her nightlife stories, the media had it. When she even knew she had enough, the media couldn’t let go because they had absorbed so much popularity and power from the public masses from all the stories behind Lohan. Instead of focusing on her recovery, she wanted to feed the media through her actions because it was her only choice to steal the spotlight. The media as well had distorted the image of Lohan on and off the screen, whether it was shooting a new film to having lunch with her parents, by making her look like this “Scarlet A” individual whom society dislikes. The mass media establishes the topics that are worth being acknowledged, and the public is interested in the topics that circulate in the mass media.
Privacy is a widely known as an arguably, unquestionable right, especially in a world of advanced technology where anything can be shared in an instant via social media. However when it comes to celebrities, it comes to show how its particular long time exception to this so called right. And because celebrities can come in various forms, such as in politicians, athletes, or entertainers, it is important to know that these fortunate (or, unfortunate) people play a vital role within the community that allows such privacy to be sacrificed, whether it be of role models, using their personal life for fame, or simply public interest in freedom of press. Like many for their intentions of seeking recognition, people will more often than not will try to present themselves in a distinctive way for the media/world to see.. It's the same case with celebrities who are seeking this sort of recognition by taking advantage of their personal life in order to help them further thrive in their success.
Mukherjee, J. (2004). Celebrity, media and politics: An indian perspective. Parliamentary Affairs, 57(1), 80-92. Retrieved from http://pa.oxfordjournals.org.ezproxy.bond.edu.au/content/57/1/80.full.pdf html
Much of today’s society seems obsessed on what actors/actress, athletes, and music artist are wearing, eating, who they are marrying, dating, where they are vacationing, what affairs they are having or have had, and how they live their everyday lives. What’s so interesting about this obsession is as a society we are implacable and often place celebrities on a pedestal, only to destroy them when they are illusive or promiscuous. Media outlets are swift to report when celebrities are in trouble but quickly forget all their accomplishments. It’s as if we want them to be perfect but once they are associated with a scandal we embark on destroying their reputation and character. Should society hold celebrities to higher standards just because they are paid millions for endorsements and a craft they worked hard to perfect? Do we as a society have the right to castigate celebrities when they misbehave? Do celebrities have the right to become livid when they are focused on for their immoral behavior? Do they love the media attention only when it benefits them? Before we can answer the above questions, would we, furthermore, can we live our life as a celebrity if given the opportunity?
Have you ever think about the influences of celebrities that affect in people life. Celebrity is a kind of pop-culture that combines between interpersonal communication and media, and it creates desires from the people assumption or expectation. Celebrities are the important tools to attract audiences. The media scholars produce the celebrity content from what people expect from life. Celebrities may drive the directions of living such as habits, tastes, attention and ambition among people (Turnere). Nowadays, celebrities are all around us. They are one of the important people who can influence the media such as movies, drama, music magazines, news or even represent the nation. According to the William’s note celebrities are one part which
In previous years, the issue with the paparazzi and media has grown. With the advances in technology, it makes taking and posting photos of celebrities or public figures much easier. The public appears greedy and feels privy to their private lives. Celebrities, or any public figure, have very limited privacy due to the paparazzi and media. The paparazzi and media are also affecting celebrities’ children. Currently, laws are being put in effect to stop this.
SIRS Issues Researcher. Web. 07 Feb. 2014. Sisto, Joseph. " Do Celebrities Forfeit the Right to Privacy?"