Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
How is the relationship between celebrities and paparazzi
Public figures and right to privacy when it comes to the media
The effects of paparazzi on celebrities' lives
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
When it comes to the topic of the celebrities lives being off the media, most of us will readily agree that celebrities’ lives should be kept private. Where this agreement usually ends, however is on the question of if their lives should not be kept private and be off limits to the media. Whereas some are convinced that celebrities have the right of privacy and media should be off limits to the media, others maintain that the private lives of the celebrities should not be private because it gives jobs to the media on what was is going on in their lives and keeping the public entertained. As for me, I agree and disagree with the lives of celebrities should be off limits to the media because, as recent research has shown that there is ways for …show more content…
The celebrity parents are always in constant worry about their children because of the media taking pictures of them and bombarding them with questions they don’t even know at all. Actor Dax Shepard wrote on the Huffington post article “Why Our Children Should Be Off Limits To the Media,” he talked about how the media have been constantly trying to take pictures of him and wife Kristen Bell’s daughter. He voiced his opinion on how tired he was that the media try to get pictures of his baby girl. He knows that the media is doing their job and that they are trying to make the public happy, but sometimes he just wants some privacy that the media wouldn’t go all crazy at all. Shepard established that, “Protecting her includes keep her life private until the moment she decides otherwise. I think she is entitled to do that. I think every minor is entitled to that” (Shepard 2). Shepard’s point is that the media shouldn’t be taking pictures of the celebrities’ children when their kids don’t even know what is going on at all. He wants celebrity parents to protect their children and try to keep them private until the child is old enough to make their decision if they want to have their picture taken by the media. Every child should be entitled to their own decisions if they want to be photographed at all, they didn’t sign up their child to be a famous …show more content…
Nordhaus wrote a book called Celebrities’ Right to Privacy: How Far Should the Paparazzi Be Allowed to go, Nordhaus talks about how celebrities use the media for free publicity. They always want 15 minutes of fame, and want the world to know them. This usually helps them get the opportunity for someone to notice them. Nordhaus talks about, “An argument exists that if celebrities expect to use the press for their personal gain, they should expect to be used by the press in return” (Nordhaus 307). In other words, Nordhaus believes that if the celebrity shouldn’t act dumb pretending that they don’t know that they are using the media for the personal benefit at all because they should know if they do use the media for their own personal gain, then the artist should know that the media is going to jump on that chance and use them well for their own personal benefit as well. While may be true that celebrities do use the media for their own personal gain it does not necessarily follow that all celebrities use the media for their own personal gain because some celebrities don’t really care about the media and don’t even care what is going on at all. Although I agree with Nordhaus up to this point, I cannot accept his overriding assumption that celebrities use the media for their personal gain because not all celebrities would use the media for their own benefit. Sometimes they want to try to get the record straight and don’t want anyone to create anymore
The quandary is that some celebrities can't understand that when one is out in plain view of the public, one cannot reasonably expect privacy. Privacy is a right reserved for when one is in private.
As celebrities stand distinctively among the masses and cast out their halos of personality charm and strong suits of skilled abilities, the controversies about them are unavoidable shadows created from their fame. With the popularization of celebrity culture, information synchronization, and communication technology, their lives are publicly exposed and various forms of media (depending on eras) record their flaws. Tough information transmitted to audiences are frequently biased, evidences of objective reality remains, even in the remote past.
...uld be justifiable to emphasize that a good number of them find it sickening to miss the limelight. . Nonetheless, it goes without mentioning that celebrities get exploited because some gossip stories explore the things that would otherwise be considered to be private.
“One man's gossip may be another man's news, but distinguishing between the two is often the key in determining whether the press is guilty of invasion of privacy.” Whether the article is newsworthy, whether the information is truthful, invasion of someone’s privacy is a tort, a civil wrong. Appropriation of name and likeness is one of the four forms of invasion of privacy that is defined as, one who appropriates to his own use or benefit the name or likeness of another is subject to liability to the other for invasion of his privacy. Like every other tort there are cases that have different forms of a defense, and information that the plaintiff and defendant have to defend to prove civil right from wrong.
After observing and researching all the sources portraying celebrities I have came into a conclusion that todays society it seems like all we want is to be accepted and we tend to look at other people and judge. Its not right, we all are different and thats what makes the world go round. It would be a pretty boring world if we were all the same. Celebrities deal with this everyday, I think the paparazzi know more about some celebrities lives than they actually do. They judge them for who they are and what they do, it is not right nor fair.
There has always been a need and a desire to tap into the celebrity lifestyle. The paparazzo is our window into this world. While the paparazzi are important in getting the stunning images of celebrities smiling on the red carpet, they overstep boundaries when they snap images of said persons without makeup as they ask their private houses. Consider the vital issue of paparazzi reform. The job of paparazzi is stressful on the body and mind; being a celebrity with your life broadcasted at every second has similar effects. The physical and mental problems faced by the men and women responsible for the photos are frightening. There is a real privacy issue when talking about the paparazzi. Celebrities lose the luxury of a quiet home when they have a string of photographers outside their homes. Safety is imperative for those in any way involved with the paparazzi. Limitations should be applied to the paparazzi for the safety and sanity of all included.
Newspapers often have to consider whether they can afford not to publish a story, a scoop on a celebrity may sell millions of papers so they stand to make money even if they are taken to court and have to pay damages. Sometimes the story is worth facing a defamation case. Bibliography McNae, Essential Law for Journalists, 2003, 17th edition Peter Carey, Media Law, 1999, 2nd edition Tom Crone, Law and the Media, 1998, 3rd edition www.parliament.the-stationery-office.co.uk
The public has been able to have access into celebrities’ private lives thanks to the “paparazzi”. Definitely, celebrities will always be in front of the camera. It comes with the frame. Nevertheless, it does not justify photographing the lives of people at the expense of their privacy. Society always wants to keep an eye on their favorite celebrities’ lives.
No matter where a person goes throughout the United States, they will not walk through the streets of New Jersey or New York for long before they hear the latest scandals with Kim Kardashian or Miley Cyrus. If a person walks into any public store they’ll quickly hear discussion of the latest stars on American Idol from passersby. While we scoff at the antics of celebrities, but at the same time we can foster an almost fanatical desire to be as if not more famous then the people everyone talks about. It is rather human to feel envy, jealously, and desire; we all want to be looked favorably upon. We roll our eyes when someone repeatedly states how beautiful or intelligent a celebrity is, yet even a skeptic can’t help but desire the admiration that celebrity received. Why do men work out? Why do women use such extensive amounts of cosmetics? Why are people so determined to be revered? The answer to individual’s thirst for fame can vary but it’s unavoidable to assume that individual wanted to be the center of attention. We want to be admired, favored, and loved as much as the celebrities that we worship. Reality television has shifted to show the “perfect” life of our celebrities and how happy they are compared to the common people. Neoliberals and authoritarian realized how our fanatical love for our celebrities can be used against us as to quote Frank Furedi from his academic journal on the topic of celebrity culture in which he has stated in the abstract in his first page: “Often celebrity provides an alternative source of validation. The tendency to outsource authority to the celebrity represents an attempt to bypass the problem of legitimacy by politicians and other figures.” Through celebrities’ neoliberals and
Photographing an individual whether famous or not in public will not violate that person’s privacy under the laws in most countries. Assuming the paparazzi isn’t assaulting someone or trespassing or otherwise doing something illegal while taking such a picture, he or she will not be violating the law. Public figures do not ask for a total invasion of their privitness .Few of us lead lives that are not classified into a newsworthy. Just because these people contribute to their profession in front of the world, it does not mean that they should be denied the right to privacy and respect. Therefore Paparazzi should be banned from exposing people’s private lives, any way they want.
We are part of a generation that is obsessed with celebrity culture. Celebrities are distinctive. Media and consumers alike invented them to be a different race of super beings: flawless, divine and above all the real moral world. In a 1995 New York Times article “In contrast, 9 out of 10 of those polled could think of something
Much of today’s society seems obsessed on what actors/actress, athletes, and music artist are wearing, eating, who they are marrying, dating, where they are vacationing, what affairs they are having or have had, and how they live their everyday lives. What’s so interesting about this obsession is as a society we are implacable and often place celebrities on a pedestal, only to destroy them when they are illusive or promiscuous. Media outlets are swift to report when celebrities are in trouble but quickly forget all their accomplishments. It’s as if we want them to be perfect but once they are associated with a scandal we embark on destroying their reputation and character. Should society hold celebrities to higher standards just because they are paid millions for endorsements and a craft they worked hard to perfect? Do we as a society have the right to castigate celebrities when they misbehave? Do celebrities have the right to become livid when they are focused on for their immoral behavior? Do they love the media attention only when it benefits them? Before we can answer the above questions, would we, furthermore, can we live our life as a celebrity if given the opportunity?
Famous people should be given more privacy by the media as they are too humans and they need to be in a private for some reasons. According to Shoai (2012), the constant attention given to famous people make their personal lives get over exposed and they are brought to public more often than they want. Shoai (2012) contends that media negative role destroys the celebrities’ live and famous people are always followed by media. There is a thin line between a celebrity’s private life and professional life when the media tries to expose his or her private life, and this ac...
In previous years, the issue with the paparazzi and media has grown. With the advances in technology, it makes taking and posting photos of celebrities or public figures much easier. The public appears greedy and feels privy to their private lives. Celebrities, or any public figure, have very limited privacy due to the paparazzi and media. The paparazzi and media are also affecting celebrities’ children. Currently, laws are being put in effect to stop this.
Puente, Maria. "Are the Children of Stars Fair Game for Paparazzi?" Usa Today 2012 aug 15: D.1. Web. 3 Dec. 2013. .