What's That Smell In The Kitchen Analysis

1280 Words3 Pages

There are many things in the world that certain people could describe as insolent, or arrogantly disrespectful, such as their significant other(s) refusing to cook dinner, clean the laundry, or watch the baby while they go out and live their life in freedom. Until around the 1800’s, these were all in full effect in America, with women across the nation in submission to their husbands, forced to perform these menial tasks without a word of disagreement lest they be chastised by society. This is highlighted and eventually defied in “What’s That Smell in the Kitchen” by Marge Piercy, the most “family-unfriendly” poem one could ever come across. It deals with a major - more resolved than most, luckily - subsection of the raging war of feminism …show more content…

One glaring example in the text that captures the emotion of an average housewife is: “Anger sputters in her brainpan, confined but spewing out missiles of hot fat.” While a brainpan is an actual human skull and not a metaphor of such, the specific use of an obscure synonym with the word “pan” rather than a plain, straightforward “skull” is rather telling, and Piercy could have possibly used it on purpose to compare the skull of a housewife, who has spent vast amounts of time in the kitchen, to a cooking pan. When connected with the usage of other kitchen terminology in the sentence, it heavily suggests that her vocabulary has been warped by lack of healthy outside influence from the world and that she cannot break past such an odd euphemism to express her anger fully, showing how dire the situation has become and why she so desperately wants to be rid of it. Moving on to the actual sentence, she is indisputably angry, and apparently enough so to sporadically leak out scalding fat in the form of missiles. Both fat and missiles carry negative connotations, fat being unhealthy and burning, which is not desirable to have on a plate of food, and missiles a lethal explosive on impact that are aimed and launched at designated targets. While they are used mainly to represent anger, they could also symbolize the wife’s attack on the dinner: she aims down a “designated target” (the dinner) and launches a “missile of fat” at it (burns it). What she actually does wish to cook for her husband will perhaps lead to a far worse fate than burnt food with crunchy torpedo shells in it, like “[him] spitted over a slow fire” or “a dead rat with a bomb in its belly.” Not only does it even further highlight her exasperation towards him

Open Document