Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Safety in the workplace
Easy on safety at work place
Workplace safety
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Safety in the workplace
Everyone wants their dream job but most people have dream jobs that can be extremely dangerous. Does your job have danger in it? Is it getting shot at while reporting the situation, dangerous? Maybe, a secret mission? There are thousands of jobs, every job might have even a little danger to it. Some say an FBI agent has a more dangerous job than others and deserves a high pay. Others say a high expected war correspondent deserves more credibility and a higher pay. War correspondents deserve more pay because they live a pure dangerous life. They need to stay focused, and on top of that they also need to investigate and report. War Correspondents deserve a higher pay. Karl Merchant discusses this topic in “On The Front: The Life Of A War Correspondent.” …show more content…
Merchant Believes they need to stay as focused as possible. He states “With investigating and writing skills as any other reporter diplomatic prowess in order to stay working”. Just think that out there, war correspondents witness everything happening and still has to stay focused to report it. Them having to multitask and are hard working individuals proves they deserve a higher pay than a FBI agent. These men and women need to solve problems and they need to get paid higher than a FBI agent. Merchants gets involved in this topic by saying “There’s a vast difference between the writer at your local newspaper and these brave investigators”. They don’t just sit there they have to investigate and report amongst the destruction of the war. Because they have to investigate and report it proves they deserve more credit and money. FBI agents, don’t get me wrong, are hard working people and deserve a reasonable pay. Stan Graf and Steffi Wawrinka discuss this subject in “FBI Agents For Change.” In the article it states “New agents must go through a 21 week training”. Although that is very impressive it doesn’t compare to the hard work these men and women war correspondents have to go through. War correspondents deserve a higher pay than a FBI
“The war correspondent is responsible for most of the ideas of battle which the public possesses … I can’t write that it occurred if I know that it did not, even if by painting it that way I can rouse the blood and make the pulse beat faster – and undoubtedly these men here deserve that people’s pulses shall beat for them. But War Correspondents have so habitually exaggerated the heroism of battles that people don’t realise that real actions are heroic.”
Beginning in the early 1960's American journalists began taking a hard look at America's involvement in South Vietnam. This inevitably led to a conflict with the American and South Vietnamese governments, some fellow journalists, and their parent news organizations. This was the last hurrah of print journalism, as television began to grow in stature. William Prochnau's, Once Upon A Distant War, carefully details the struggles of these hardy journalists, led by David Halberstram, Malcolm Browne, and Neil Sheehan. The book contains stories, told in layers, chronicling America's growing involvement in South Vietnam from 1961 through 1963.
In the aftermath of a comparatively minor misfortune, all parties concerned seem to be eager to direct the blame to someone or something else. It seems so easy to pin down one specific mistake that caused everything else to go wrong in an everyday situation. However, war is a vastly different story. War is ambiguous, an enormous and intangible event, and it cannot simply be blamed for the resulting deaths for which it is indirectly responsible. Tim O’Brien’s story, “In the Field,” illustrates whom the soldiers turn to with the massive burden of responsibility for a tragedy. The horrible circumstances of war transform all involved and tinge them with an absurd feeling of personal responsibility as they struggle to cope.
In conclusion, while books, photos, movies and other historical documentation can portray information or a message about wartime events, they will never be able to produce the feelings of those that were personally involved in wars have experienced. Yet, it is incorrect to criticize these writers. The information they reveal is still very important historical information. Even if a reader or viewer of this media cannot feel exactly the same emotions as those involved, they still often experience an emotional connection to the events being depicted. This is important, not only for the historical knowledge gained about wars, but also to understand the nature and futility of their occurrence.
With this over the years the FBI has been given a large amount of authority to serve and protect. Doing so the FBI has been broken into seven areas to follow the U.S. Constitution. Background Investigations, Civil Rights, Domestic Terrorism, National Foreign Intelligence, Organized Crime/Drug Cases, Violent Crimes, and White Collar Crimes. Given this a large amount of authority even today the FBI sees to it that they base all their actions from the U.S. Constitution.
heroes of the war but it is those people that stand up and proclaim the utter stupidity of
Forsling, C. (2014, September 9 ). Task and purpose . Retrieved November 16, 2017, from Task and purpose : http://taskandpurpose.com/real-problem-military-salaries-compensation/
Should soldiers or athletes get paid more money? I say the soldiers should get paid more because they protect our country and plus too soldiers represent the United States. Athletes get paid more in a day than a soldier gets a year. The average salary the soldiers get in a year is 99,000. Soldiers don’t get that much like they should get. That's why they need to be paid more money.
Soldiers make an average of $1,416.30 per month,but the payment increases when rank up and with years of experience.This is what the soldiers choose to do they could have been a football,baseball,or soccer player.The only time soldiers didn’t get to pick what they wanted to become was when they had to be drafted.
As a Wall Street Journal Pentagon correspondent, Thomas E. Ricks is one of America’s elite military journalists. He has been nominated for a Pulitzer Prize and awarded a Society of Professional Journalists Award for his writings based on the Marines. Thomas E. Ricks lectures to military officers and was a member of Harvard University’s Senior Advisory Council on the project on U.S. Civil-Military Relations. As a Pentagon correspondent, he can access information where no other civilian can step foot—traveling with soldiers abroad, his eyes tell the tale of the life of a Marine.
If college athletes deserve to get paid, then there must be some sort of system put in place to pay these athletes. This is when a system gets put into place that has many similarities to the way how professional teams operate. First all of the division I men’s basketball and football teams are going to be given a salary cap. This will be the same for every college program in the country and would top off at $650,000 dollars for basketball teams and $3 million dollars for football teams. There are going to be people who believe that this is not possible for the universities to pay their athletes this amount of money. But when “the combined $3.65 million dollars is around half of the salary that Michigan head football coach made this season
...though people believe that, those on the home front have it just as a bad as the soldiers, because they have to deal with the responsibilities of their husbands, there is nothing that can compare to what these men have gone through. The war itself consumed them of their ideology of a happy life, and while some might have entered the war with the hope that they would soon return home, most men came to grips with the fact that they might never make it out alive. The biggest tragedy that follows the war is not the number of deaths and the damages done, it is the broken mindset derives from being at war. These men are all prime examples of the hardships of being out at war and the consequences, ideologies, and lifestyles that develop from it.
He has not seen the blood or heard the screams of suffering soldiers. He has not watched his best friend die in his arms after being hit by enemy fire. He is an onlooker, free to analyze and critique every aspect of the war from the safety of his office. He is free and safe to talk about ethics and proper war etiquette. The soldier, immersed in battle, fighting for his life, can think of only one thing.
To further understand on what Martin Bell believed, it is essential to understand where he standpoint is. Martin Bell is a former broadcast war reporter, prominent in all of British news network and reported on countless of wars, one where he even got wounded reporting on the Sarajevo war. During his years of service he has always followed the traditional views on journalism, or what he called bystanders’ journalism, similar to the Neil Report written by BBC, and is used as recommendations and guidelines for future journalists. “The Report sets out and emphasizes the core values of BBC journalism. They are truth and accuracy, serving the public interest, impartiality and diversity of opinion, independence, and accountabili...
cause they are senior to a young Soldier that was trusted to them by there families, then they to