Journalism Of Attachment Essay

1077 Words3 Pages

In this era of globalization, news reporting is no longer just a means of communications, but it has also developed into a tool for change. Prominent journalists like Julian Assange, Nick Davies, Sir Charles Wheeler and many more has changed the landscape and outcomes of information, war and news reporting itself. But Martin Bell has challenged the fundamentals of journalism that is to be balanced and impartial with what he calls ‘Journalism of Attachment’. He even coined the phrase, ‘bystanders’ journalism’ for continuing the tradition of being distant and detached (Bell 1997), which he criticizes “for focusing with the circumstances of violence, such as military formations, weapons, strategies, maneuvers and tactics” (Gilboa 2009, p. 99). Therefore it is the aim of this essay to explain whether it is ethical for reporters to practice what Martin Bell calls the Journalism of Attachment by evaluating its major points and its counterarguments, and assessing other notions of journalism such as peace journalism.

To further understand on what Martin Bell believed, it is essential to understand where he standpoint is. Martin Bell is a former broadcast war reporter, prominent in all of British news network and reported on countless of wars, one where he even got wounded reporting on the Sarajevo war. During his years of service he has always followed the traditional views on journalism, or what he called bystanders’ journalism, similar to the Neil Report written by BBC, and is used as recommendations and guidelines for future journalists. “The Report sets out and emphasizes the core values of BBC journalism. They are truth and accuracy, serving the public interest, impartiality and diversity of opinion, independence, and accountabili...

... middle of paper ...

...eir own actions or it would just eventually add to the constructive of conflicts.

In extreme situations, journalists choose the angle they can find, tick the boxes to the news worthiness, but never having a stand. According to Kempf, journalists fulfill certain criteria of newsworthiness and fake empirical evidence, which implements propaganda and in the journalists’ defense “that it did not matter the pictures were faked since they only showed what people already ‘knew’ and since they served the goal of opening the eyes of the public” (Kempf 2002, p. 60). Various examples from the War on Terror, where journalists and reporters would fake evidence just to gain more audiences but examples like this could elevate the issues, and it is as if this responsibility of Journalism of Attachment only adds fuel to the fire and this is done in the name of peace (Kempf 2002).

Open Document