Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Essay on electronic waste management
Solution and conclusion for e-waste
Essay on electronic waste management
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Essay on electronic waste management
Electronic Waste Taking Over
Electronic waste is one of the most rapidly growing problems of the world. The cost to humanity and the earth’s ecosystem for wanting to have the latest and greatest electronic device whether it is a new I-pod, cell phone, computer, tablet or TV is staggering amounts of electronic waste. Electronic waste, or as it is more commonly referred to, e-waste, is any unwanted electronic device. It does not matter if the piece of technology is still working or not. Once the owner no longer finds value in keeping it, it becomes waste. Most people do not know what to do with their old technology. They wait for their municipalities to run a program that allows them to donate their old equipment for recycling and happily unload the old stuff which, in some cases, means that the technology they are getting rid of is only 6 months old adding to the mountains of e-waste in the world.
Nate Rawlings (2013) states in his article, “Emerging Economies Now the Leading Producers of E-Waste,” that “the overall amount of e-waste is expected to grow 33 percent in the next five years, from 48.9 million tons last year to 65.4 million tons in 2017. That’s the same weight as 200 Empire State Buildings.” Electrical and electronic equipment (EEE) is a fast growing industry and the huge amount of electronics disposed of each year is not just basic waste that is harmless. Each electronic device contains a variety of toxic substances. When e-waste is dumped into landfills, these substances can leach into the soil and groundwater over time. If the e-waste is burned, then more toxic chemicals are released into the air, and both the leaching of the chemicals into the ground and water and the releasing of toxins into the air progress...
... middle of paper ...
...ng and disposal
• Protective protocol for workers in e-waste disposal
• Bilateral and multilateral cooperation – awareness building.
Citizens have a role e-waste management as well. We can reuse electronics by donating them where needed rather than disposing of them, when buying products pick those that are made of less toxic materials, build public awareness of the hazards of e-waste in our communities and globally.
Technology is an important part of our lives. Hopefully, technology can also become part of solving the problems we face with disposing of e-waste. There must be a desire to stop the use of hazardous chemicals, stop the e-waste from piling up and seeping into the landscape, the atmosphere, wildlife and our bodies. The health of not only our planet and the various ecosystems depend on finding a workable solution, but our human existence as well.
Radioactive Waste One of the most talked about opposition to nuclear fission is the radioactive waste it produces. Radioactive waste is what is left behind after using a reactor to make electricity. There are two levels of waste, low and high, but both are regulated by the Department of Energy and the Nuclear Regulatory Commission. High level waste is made up of fuel that’s been used directly in the reactor, which is highly radioactive but can still be disposed of. Low-level waste is the contaminated items that have been exposed to radiation.
Even though electronic waste contributes one percent of waste as discussed earlier, it poses a significant threat to the environment. “RCRA does not, however, cover electronic waste except CRTs, nor does it regulate electronic devices donated for educational or charitable reuse.” The RCRA should implement rules to govern e-waste because e-waste not only affects lives in the United States, It affects everyone globally. E-waste typically finds its ways out of the United States and ends up in developing countries like
The e-waste trade is an exploitative industry in which electronics, circuit boards, old TV’s and desktops that are of no more value, get dumped into third world countries such as Ghana, Vietnam, Malaysia, Pakistan, Hong Kong, and many others. The people of these third world countries than burn the electronics in order to collect the remains and scraps of copper and iron that can be sold for money. The smell and burning smolder of plastic from the computers and old TV’s are incredibly toxic, slowly killing the children, women, and men that burn these e-waste remains in order to create a living for themselves. Adam Smith, Karl Marx, and Emile Durkheim all have theories that can be applied and related to this trade of e-waste. Adam Smith’s theory
The article, “Our E-Waste Problem is Ridiculous, and Gadget Makers Aren’t Helping,” by Christina Bonnington, focused the process of electronic devices to be recycled, the challenges of recycling electronic waste, and making devices more recyclable. First, Bonnington described the recycling process. Depending on the condition on the product will determine if it will be reused or stripped down to be destroyed. According to the author, having a simpler design makes the reprocessing easier to bare the electronics for turning into materials. Next, the author mentioned the challenges of recycling. One challenge is how electronics are becoming more compact and tougher to strip apart to separate the materials. Conferring to Bonnington, batteries are
The words ‘Reduce, Reuse, and Recycle’ are what a person chants if someone mentions the word recycling. Nicks J defines recycling as ‘[T]he processing of waste materials in order to make them reusable” (11). Individuals who recycle are not just throwing papers in green bins, or cans in blue; in fact, they are helping the environment more than they can imagine. People who want to preserve and protect their planet take the initiative to recycle waste materials. Rather than throwing away old plastic or glass bottles, aluminum cans, and certain types of paper, one can simply recycle them, and they will go through a cleaning and the remanufacturing process to be remade into a new usable item.
Electronic waste, or any waste for that matter is an inevitable part of an economic system where the destruction of an ecosystem is the primarily source of resources that are used to create the product. The waste that occurs from this process has to be disposed of in some way and more often than not, it is disposed of carelessly with out consideration to the affect it would have on the environment or the very people that create and let capitalism live on, “The political economy approach also defers progress on environmental issues to a pint after economic ones are solved” (Robbins et al. 2010, 114). And if this continues there may be no place left for the excess waste created by capitalism.
...ion even more. We tend to shop for more products that we want because we are never contented on what we have. This results into an increase amount of electronic waste products that often end up in our landfills, or are being burned in incinerators, all to which are the cause of air, land, and water pollution.
Statistically, US alone is the leading country in the volume of high-tech trash with 30 kilograms per person and 9.4 million metric tons of e-waste per year. Followed by ...
Have you ever heard of the term “e-waste”? If not, you’re not alone. Thankfully two very like minded individuals, Annie Leonard, who is the co creator of the Global Alliance for Incinerator, and Chris Caroll, writer for National Geographic Magazine, dedicated their time to enlighten people into the unseen life cycle of outdated house held tech, “e-waste.” In Leonard’s essay, “The Story of Stuff: Electronics,” and Caroll’s short film script “High Tech Trash,” the reader gets an in-depth understating of the tremendous impact the technological empire has on the environment, and the individuals involved in the circulation of their products. Although Leonard and Caroll concede that e-waste is negatively impacting our environment, due to technologies
The Goodrich Corporation paper talks about Goodrich Aerostructures which is a division of the Goodrich Corporation. Goodrich Aerostructures is known as a world leader independent full-service supplier of nacelles, pylons, thrust reversers and other types of aircraft components for large commercial, regional and military aircraft. On the other hand, the type of business-evaluated throughout the Boeing Everett article was the Aerospace/Aviation Industry. Boeing Everett programs were evaluated to implement and establish lean programs.
The environmental performance of numerous tech companies has been evaluated and since Apple has grown over time, it has received more attention. There has been a frequent campaign against Apple by different environmental organisations such as Greenpeace requesting for the elimination of hardware components that are non-recyclable hardware components, a comprehensive plan that would make the products of Apple not end up in the waste and the removal of toxins from iPhone hardware (Apple Inc. 2016). As much as such campaigns affect the operations of Apple Inc., they are good since they help in the conservation of the environment thus having a good impact on the
one can reuse nearly anything from paper bags and newspapers to even motor vehicle. by doing so, humans can help in decreasing landfills. Try to use the unnecessary things into some other casing but, simply don't discard them. Reduce your need to purchase new items or utilize less, bringing about a littler measure of waste. Regardless of the possibility that you have to purchase, consider purchasing eco-friendly
In old batteries, there is a toxic lead that is causing health problems for the Taiwan people who are disposing these batteries (Gay, 12). Space is becoming a landfill from the excess of space flights and the radioactive supplies from nuclear reactors, which could come to our atmosphere and explode (Gay, 13). When businesses run out of space to dump their toxic trash they go to poor nations because they do not have strict safety regulations (Gay, 31). The landfills on Earth are not the only place trash is getting put. The ocean is being trashed with plastic bags, soda can holders, and large fishnets, which are harming dolphins, turtles, sea lions, and others (Gay, 69). Military bases in the U.S have more hazardous waste and are responsible for contamination in soil and waters (Gay, 83). There are other hazards happening because we are throwing away so much stuff that companies have to remake all of those products. Incinerators are places where waste is burned to ashes and if we recycle these can go away. Incinerators cause sulfur dioxide, carbon m...
Traditional methods of waste disposal have proven to be ineffective and have caused harmful effects on the environment. The most popular and inexpensive way to get rid of garbage is burial, but burying your problems does not necessarily mean getting rid of them. Landfill sites pose as severe ecological threats as these mass garbage dump yards overflow with trash and frequently contaminate our air, soil and water with hazardous wastes. About 400 million tons of hazardous wastes are generated each year1. A large-scale release of these materials can cause thousands of deaths and may poison the environment for many years. For example many industrial companies around the world cannot afford to enforce the strict pollution regulations set by many developed countries. This usually forces these types of companies to move to developing countries where pollution regulations are very lenient. These developing countries knowingly accept environmentally hazardous companies usually because they are in desperate need of employment. The harmful effects of these companies were clearly illustrated in the 1960s and 1970s when residents living near Minamata Bay, Japan, developed nervous disorders, tremors, and paralysis in a mysterious epidemic. The root was later found to be a local industry that had released mercury, a highly toxic element, into Minamata Bay. The disaster had claimed the lives of 400 people1. Since 1970 you can bet that a lot more than 400 people have died as a result of waste disposal. If the type of waste disposal were cheaper and effective we wouldn’t have to deal with waste problems, which still plague mankind today.
Preserving the environment is very important. One way that would be possible is by recycling. Recycling is the recovery and reprocessing of waste materials for use in new products. There are important environmental and economic benefits connected with recycling. Common materials that are recycled consist of aluminum cans, glass, paper, wood, and plastic (“Recycling”). Cleveland, Ohio joined the ranks of requiring recycling and also fines the homeowners for not disposing of waste correctly or leaving cans out too early or too long (McElroy 1). Michele McCay says that recycling is one of the easiest, most tangible ways of taking action for the planet (par. 1). If that is the case, why is it not required in all states? Recycling should be mandatory because it saves natural resources, it conserves energy, and it reduces pollution.