High Tech Trash Analysis

1085 Words3 Pages

Have you ever heard of the term “e-waste”? If not, you’re not alone. Thankfully two very like minded individuals, Annie Leonard, who is the co creator of the Global Alliance for Incinerator, and Chris Caroll, writer for National Geographic Magazine, dedicated their time to enlighten people into the unseen life cycle of outdated house held tech, “e-waste.” In Leonard’s essay, “The Story of Stuff: Electronics,” and Caroll’s short film script “High Tech Trash,” the reader gets an in-depth understating of the tremendous impact the technological empire has on the environment, and the individuals involved in the circulation of their products. Although Leonard and Caroll concede that e-waste is negatively impacting our environment, due to technologies …show more content…

Leonard created: “a collection of short, animated films that detail the complicated relationships between humans, their stuff, and the environment,” While, On the other hand, Caroll’s “High Tech Trash” was published in National Geographic, and mainly focuses on the “typically unseen, portion of the life cycle”(Leonard 50; Caroll 78). “The Story of Stuff: Electronics,” was originally a short film created by Leonard; however, Leonard published the film’s transcript into an essay type format, which in return gives her essay a more relaxed feel, due to the brevity and style of her content. Although Leonard adds numerous paragraphs entitled “notes” at the end of her essay, the organization of her content is very loose and covers a broad spectrum of the e-waste affair. In contrast, Caroll’s essay is a much longer, more in depth essay into the last portion of the e-waste life cycle, which is when our outdated technology ends up in toxic dumps of foreign countries. By Caroll focusing the majority of his essay on a single aspects e-waste, and the structure he uses to interpret his message, his essay may appeal to a smaller group of people. Leonard, on the other hand, may appeal to a more general group of people, due to the colloquial nature of her essay and …show more content…

Caroll forms relationships with the people that are being affected by the harsh toxins in our e-waste, thus creating an emotional appeal for the reader. For example, Caroll depicts a young boy living in Ghana, and the process he goes through to make a living off our old technological garbage. “With the flame retardant burned away-a process that has released a bouquet of carcinogens and other toxics- the wire may fetch a dollar from the scrap-metal buyer (79). The picture Caroll paints of a young boy surrounded by toxic fumes while burring “e-waste,” to only scrape by with a dollar creates a very unsettling image. Although Caroll and Leonard want to open the readers eyes into the negative effects of e-waste, both use separate focus points, such as Caroll’s detailed imagery and first person point of view on the last “unseen” portion of the e-waste cycle, and Leonard’s brief but chronological order of the entire e-waste

Open Document