The Pros And Cons Of Bombing Japan

602 Words2 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: The effects of the atomic bomb on japan

There was no need to bomb Japan they were almost ready to stop fighting the war anyway. They were already defeated and beaten. It was just cruel to bomb Japan after they had already had 60 cities that had been bombed. Japan was basically on their last metaphorical legs. The US stomped on Japan while they were beaten and battered on the ground. Especially after killing thousands of people due to the US firebombing them. Not only that but Japan’s home islands were being blocked off by the US. What is the point of making Japan suffer more than they had already suffered? There isn’t one.

Another reason that the US did the wrong thing is that of all the places the US could have chosen to bomb, they chose an area with lots of civilians. Tokyo harbor would have been a better choice because if the US had bombed the harbor it would have killed fewer people and still prove their power. See if the US had done that instead, it would have convinced the Japanese government to surrender with fewer deaths. Another thing is that if the US bombed Tokyo harbor, they would have only had to use one bomb and not two. If you truly think about it, there was no need to destroy those two cities and kill countless people. If the US had used common sense, Hiroshima and Nagasaki would have never been destroyed and those people would not have lost …show more content…

The civilians had no say in what the military was doing during WWll. To bomb a town where most of the population were civilians, was a little unnecessary. Seriously though if the US really wanted to cause damage they should have bombed a military base, but no the US decided to bomb a bunch of civilians! The military value of Hiroshima and Nagasaki was almost nonexistent. What is the point of bombing civilians? Oh, guess what the only point was to kill thousands of

Show More
Related

  • Atomic Bomb Justified Dbq

    646 Words  | 2 Pages

    The Japanese government believed that the only way to solve its economic and demographic problems was to expand into its neighbor’s territory and take over its import market, mostly pointed at China. To put an end on that the United States put economic sanctions and trade embargoes. We believed that if we cut off their resources and their source of federal income than they would have no choice but to pull back and surrender. But the

    Read More

  • The Pros And Cons Of The Atomic Bomb

    1061 Words  | 3 Pages

    The U.S. also announced to Japan that we would use a weapon that would cause massive destruction and the majority of citizens ignored it. At the time, there was a threat that Russia would become a problem after the war. The U.S. dropped the bombs in Japan to end the war as quickly as possible to prevent Russia from gaining land in Asia. Therefore, the use of the bombs was not purely to defeat the

    Read More

  • The United States was Justified in Dropping the Atomic Bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki

    965 Words  | 2 Pages

    The United States was justified in dropping the atomic bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki for many reasons. First of all, just to start out, the bombings had nothing to do with Japan, it was about the Cold War and the real reason America used these weapons was to show Russia that the US possessed them. Second, the war in the Pacific had been raging for almost four years. The two battles immediately preceding the bomb decision were Iwo Jima and Okinawa, two battles where the Japanese fought to the death and the cost in American casualties was horrific. It was predicted that the invasion of the Japanese mainland at the Island of Kyushu -- scheduled for November of 1945 -- would be even worse.

    Read More

  • The Pros And Cons Of Dropping The Atomic Bomb

    1246 Words  | 3 Pages

    We agree that, whatever be one’s judgment of the war in principle, the surprise bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki are morally indefensible. The “8 Primary Pros and Cons of Dropping the Atomic Bomb” People also say how Japan was already defeated, concluding why the bombs were unnecessary. Although, many others say that the dropping of the atomic bombs saved their lives, but the debate over the decision to drop the atomic bomb will never be resolved. The war against Japan bestowed the Allies with entirely new problems as they encountered an enemy with utterly unfamiliar tactics.

    Read More

  • The Benefits of Dropping an Atomic Bomb on Japan

    1278 Words  | 3 Pages

    Angelina Jolie said, “Without pain, there would be no suffering, without suffering we would never learn from our mistakes. To make it right, pain and suffering is the key to windows, without it, there is no way of life.” On August 6, 1945 the atomic bomb was dropped on Hiroshima, a small city whose death toll rises to 90,000-166,000. On August 9th, a second bomb was dropped on Nagasaki, 60,000–80,000 . In total, 15 million people lost their lives during the duration of the Second World War. In John Hersey's book, Hiroshima, he provides a detailed account of six people and how the bombing of Hiroshima affected their lives. John Heresy felt it was important to focus his story on six individuals to create a remembrance that war affects more than just nations and countries, but actual human beings. Moreover, the book details the effect the bomb had on the city of Hiroshima. “Houses all around were burning, and the wind was now blowing hard.” (Hersey, 27). Before the bomb, there existed few laws to govern the use of a weapon of this magnitude because of the complexity and modern technology that the bomb used. To address the fears of the use of the atomic bomb, new laws were created to govern its use. The atom bomb should have been dropped on Japan in order to prevent the further use of such a destructive force.

    Read More

  • The Pros And Cons Of The Atomic Bomb On Japan

    1456 Words  | 3 Pages

    The decision to drop the atomic bomb was a mistake that could have been avoided. Although what is done is done, it is not acceptable to justify our actions by saying that Hitler killed more innocent people than us. As Joe Paterno said, "We shall act with good intentions, but at times we will be wrong. When we are, let us admit it and try to right the situation. " This is a crucial point that we must not forget, despite any pointless justifications.

    Read More

  • Why the Atomic Bomb Was the Wrong Choice

    1354 Words  | 3 Pages

    One of the most argued topics today, the end of World War II and the dropping of the atomic bombs still rings in the American ear. Recent studies by historians have argued that point that the United States really did not make the right choice when they chose to drop the atomic bombs on Nagasaki and Hiroshima. Also with the release of once classified documents, we can see that the United States ...

    Read More

  • Was The Atomic Bomb Used To Stop Soviet Expansion?

    442 Words  | 1 Pages

    Revenge also played a role in the decision to bomb Japan. The Japanese were not following the Geneva Convention in regards to treatment of prisoners of war. This document says that prisoners are not to be put through torture of physical or psychological nature. The Japanese refused to comply that and would decapitate American prisoners, or shove bamboo shoots under their fingernails. The American government also wanted revenge for the surprise attack on Pearl Harbor.

    Read More

  • The Pros And Cons Of The Atomic Bomb

    1326 Words  | 3 Pages

    One of the most controversial decisions that have been made, in the history of the United States, was Harry Truman’s decision to drop atomic bombs on the two Japanese cities of Hiroshima and Nagasaki. The ever so controversial topic of the dropping of the atomic bombs has successfully driven people insane. People feel strongly that this decision was atrocious and unnecessary, while others believe the polar opposite, that it was completely necessary. Some historians argue that the human cost to the Japanese population can never justify the use of such weapons. Other historians see it from an optimistic perspective, that it would not have been moral if atomic weapons had not been used to end the war as quickly as possible. President Harry S.

    Read More

  • Atomic Bomb In World War 2

    385 Words  | 1 Pages

    During the initial blast the A-bomb released about 85% of its energy as intense heat followed by a supersonic shock wave that is felt as a highly destructive high pressure air blast, which can easily demolish tall buildings, not to mention people. After the initial blast radiation covers the area, causing people, animals, and structures to practically disintegrate. Even years afterwards people were still dying and having health problems related to the radiation they were exposed to long before. There were many people that were strongly opposed to the using of nuclear weapons on Japan. But invading the is land instead of bombing would have taken perhaps 1 million us soldiers lives.

    Read More

  • Fire Bombing Argumentative Essay

    1290 Words  | 3 Pages

    If the United States had decided not to drop the bombs and continue with a land invasion, then there would be a continuous cycle of D-day invasions and a stalemate would have to be called after several gruesome battles. With the dropping of the atomic bombs, the Japanese unconditionally surrendered and stated that they lost the war. As stated earlier, the Japanese fight to the death and would most likely win in the attempt of a land invasion. Some counter arguments might say that there alternatives such as a demonstration on an island or the United States needed to wait on the aid of the Russians. However, the Japanese culture would have mocked the U.S. if they saw them drop the bomb on a deserted island. In addition, the Russians had just left East Germany and had at least a four month minimum time period to mobilize their military all the way to Japan, and still have time to effectively invade. Plus, the invasion would not have worked because of the barbaric fighting tactics from Japan. On top of all this, the American economy was still in an severe depression. The United States had to quickly end the war so that the government could focus on efficiently restoring the economy and getting out of the depression. Dropping the bomb resulted in fewer American lives lost and shortened the war.

    Read More

  • The Decision To Drop The Atomic Bomb

    884 Words  | 2 Pages

    President Truman's decision to drop the atomic bomb on the cities of Hiroshima and Nagasaki were the direct cause for the end of World War II in the Pacific. The United States felt it was necessary to drop the atomic bombs on these two cities or it would suffer more casualties. Not only could the lives of many soldiers have been taken, but possibly the lives of many innocent Americans. The United States will always try to avoid the loss of American civilians at all costs, even if that means taking lives of another countries innocent civilians.

    Read More

  • The Unjustified Use of Atomic Bombs on Japan

    879 Words  | 2 Pages

    Firstly, the bombings were unjustified because of the locations where the bombs were dropped. Neither cities were military or naval bases. Hiroshima was “… on a river delta and had been a fishing settlement for centuries” (Lawton) while Nagasaki was a shipbuilding city. Furthermore, Nagasaki had been bombed five times in the twelve months previous to the assault by the U.S. (“The Bombing of Nagasaki”). Both cities were also highly populated leading to high casualty levels. Before the attacks, Hiroshima had a population of 255,000 people and Nagasaki was home to 195,000 people. When these cities were attacked, 70,000 out of those 255,000 died in Hiroshima and 42,000 out of 195,000 perished in Nagasaki. This means that the bombings whipped out 27% of Hiroshima and 22% of the Nagasaki population (Total Casualties).

    Read More

  • The Atomic Bombing Of Hiroshima And Nagasaki

    1721 Words  | 4 Pages

    “My God, what have we done?” were the words that the co-pilot of Enola Gay wrote in his logbook after helping drop two bombs, one in Hiroshima and one in Nagasaki, that killed an estimated two-hundred thousand individuals. The bombings were completely unnecessary. Japan was already defeated because they lacked the necessary materials to continue a world war. The Japanese were prepared to surrender. There was no military necessity to drop the atomic bombs nor is there any factual information stating that the bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki were dropped to “save the lives of one million American soldiers.” The United States bombed Japan in August of 1945. The atomic bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki were uncalled for and could have been avoided.

    Read More

  • Hiroshima And Nagasaki Justified Essay

    619 Words  | 2 Pages

    Many were left clueless of why the United States went to the extent of using the atomic bomb on Hiroshima and Nagasaki because using a bomb was illegal. Also, the United States was meant to serve as a model for a place with abundant human rights, but the bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki, which was an inhumane act. A multitude of people held the opinion that the bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki was not justified by the United States. As a result, after the bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki, the people of the United States were left in complete disarray. The United States’s choice to bomb Hiroshima and Nagasaki was illegal.

    Read More

More about The Pros And Cons Of Bombing Japan

Open Document