Romanticism: The Power of Nature Vs. Science

1047 Words3 Pages

Romanticism: Nature or Nah* Can a society of learners and explorers coexist with an ecosystem that can barely stay afloat? “The Tables Turned” by William Wordsworth and “When I Heard the Learn’d Astronomer” by Walt Whitman both tackle the concept of nature vs. science. While the two agree on many terms, the underlying message of each is drastically different. “Tables” is much more didactic while “Astronomer” is the story of a revelation. With both poems having Romantic themes, the two must agree on the basic notions of Romanticism, in this case, the power of nature. Yet, the two disagree on a major aspect of Romanticism, self discovery. “Tables” and “Astronomer” share the same baseline thoughts, yet still tell their own stories of Romanticism. Both “Astronomer” and “Tables” take the same stance on science and nature; nature is a better teacher than science and both cannot coexist naturally. Although these poems have …show more content…

“Tables”, starting with the speaker encouraging his “friend” to get out into the world and “quit” his “books” already has made a decision on the subject. He is claiming that books are boring and an endless “strife” while the outdoor are full of life and “wisdom”. The speaker’s main goal of this poem is to persuade or convince his “friend”. In terms of Romanticism, yes, “Tables” is about the power of nature and how “we murder to dissect”, but there is no sense of self discovery. On the other hand, “Astronomer” is about both nature and the path to self discovery. Since the speaker in “Astronomer” personally “wander’d off” into the “moist night-air” he arrived at the conclusion that nature is the best teacher by himself, making “Astronomer” almost more romantic than “Tables” because it is a path of self discovery. In “Tables” the speaker is actively trying to get his “friend” to understand that nature is the best teacher. In this way, the two poems are

Open Document