The Open Public Records Act (OPRA)

1130 Words3 Pages

I. Question Presented: Whether or not financial information can be rightfully redacted within the confines of OPRA? (I.e. pricing information/value of contract overall) II. Statement of Facts: Losing bidders have come and requested that University Hospital releases to them specific documents that may carry sensitive information. Certain information that is contained within the requested documents may give a party an unfair competitive advantage. Therefore, as to protect bidders, a determination must be made regarding what type of information can be redacted within the scope of OPRA. III. The plain language of OPRA: The Open Public Records Act guarantees the access to public records in the state of New Jersey. However, along …show more content…

“Nothing in this act shall be construed to require the disclosure of: 14(j). Information which, if disclosed, would frustrate government procurement or give an advantage to any person proposing to enter into a contract or agreement with an agency including information involved in the collective bargaining process. 14(n). Trade secrets or confidential commercial and financial information obtained, upon request, from a person.” In support of the disclosure restrictions found in OPRA is the Government Records Council. The Government Records Council provides an expanded list of twenty-five (25) disclosure exemptions. The reason for the expanded list of exemptions is because other state and federal statutes govern the disclosure of specific material outside of OPRA. Pursuant to the relevant disclosure exemptions, N.J.S.A. 47:1A-1.1 specifies the following materials as exempt from disclosure: “trade secrets and proprietary commercial or financial information obtained from any source.” And “information which, if disclosed, would give an advantage to competitors or bidders.” Any information which if disclosed would lead to trade secrets becoming compromised or give an advantage to competitors or bidders must be …show more content…

They defined trade secrets as a “compilation of information which is used in one’s business, and which gives him an opportunity to obtain an advantage over competitors who do not know or use it.”[3] Furthermore, other than the definition, the court took into account certain considerations that should be used in deciding what information should be regarded as a trade secret. Those considerations include how much effort was used to protect the information, the information’s value to the owner and competitor, the amount of effort used to develop the information, and how easy or difficult the information can be replicated.[4] For additional clarification, the court also provided the definition found in the restatement third, unfair competition sub 39 which defines trade secrets as “information that can be used in the operation of a business or other enterprise and that is sufficiently valuable and secret to afford a potential economic advantage over others.”[5] In support, the court in Rousseau looked at Trump’s Castle Assocs., to help expand their understanding of ‘trade secrets’. The court in Trump’s Castle held that trade secrets can include “pricing and marketing techniques.”[6] By attaching definitions to these terms, the court in Rousseau essentially set out to create a uniform standard for OPRA as to prevent the divulgement of protected

More about The Open Public Records Act (OPRA)

Open Document