Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Negative impact of imperialism
Negative impact of imperialism
Negative impact of imperialism
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Imperialism, is it the big, bad master who enslaves the good, little child or is it the good, big master who protects the bad, little child? As history has shown in the past; sometimes, it is both. Through examination of three important pieces of literature “Shooting an Elephant by G. Orwell, White Man’s Burden by R. Kipling, and The War Prayer by M. Twain, it becomes obvious that there are serious consequences in supporting imperialistic ideals. Three very important ideas about Imperialism can be gleaned from these writings, which then provide a distinct concept about the subject.
Empires are made weak by their own indignation, they are believed to be the master but are actually the slave, and they are ravaged by their own conquest until
…show more content…
Imperialism is a double edged sword which has been wielded by nations around the world for centuries but which serves no purpose but to harm all it touches. Orwell described the beginning of the end of the empire as a hollowness, and the futility of the British dominion in the colony of Burma, as a sea of yellow faces momentarily watching to see the elephant killed. The Burmese people hated Britain and saw the empire as a mad elephant, a good for nothing beast in need of destruction. At the moment in time when the British Empire had outlived its days of glory, it was described as when the white man has turned into a mad tyrant that it is his own freedom that he has destroyed. It would take several more years for the British Empire to let go of the colonies. The empire would never again stretch across the globe never to see the sun set upon it, but it was also far from dead. The spirits of the British people and the colonized territories endured a slow and painful tug of war before it was done. There was much more agony for both sides. Mr. Kipling wrote of eloquently of the selfishness of Imperialism, as did Mr. Twain, and how it ravages all involved. Nothing is left untouched by the ruthlessness of war, so take heed with the selfishness in the building of empires, for the harm it will bring to you in the …show more content…
Building empires required great cost of life and limb in order to obtain wealth. This blessing, which countries asked for themselves, was also a curse (Twain, 1923). Alas, the words of these writers fell on deft ears however, as Mr. Twain knew it would. That was the “glad and gracious time”, the time, was a time of empires! Anyone who disapproved of such imperialistic conduct would not convince the majority that it was a terrible and vicious losing battle, crushing the spirits of all it touched. Imperialism is like the prayer of a man that does not realize what he has just asked for, and has no idea of the real and terrible outcome. This was the message Mr. Twain, Mr. Kipling, and Mr. Orwell tried to convey in their writings. Imperialism comes at too high a price to pay. The lesson is there to be learned. Empires are made weak through haughty indignation, they are conceived to be the master but are actually the slave, and they are ravaged by their own conquest until the people’s spirits are
In Orwell’s reflective narrative, “Shooting an Elephant”, he reveals the truth on imperialism. Through the utilization of irony and the method of appeals, Orwell shows the reader that imperialism is just a definition because the people are in control, not Britain.
Chapter 1: Introduction The problem of internal revolt is inherent to all empires, as it is difficult to consistently maintain authority over a large and diverse population. Although empires have taken steps to prevent a loss of control from occurring, even the utmost vigilance has either not been enough, or has lapsed long enough for a revolt to occur. The resulting uprising might be minor, or it might be serious enough to threaten a crucial territory. How empires have dealt with a major internal revolt is instructive in several ways: it tests whether or not the empire's military is strong enough to deal with revolts, it tests the ability of the ruler or the ruling class to maintain their authority in the face of the challenge, and it provides a way to examine an empire's policies by looking at which ones may have contributed to the revolt, and which were changed or introduced in its aftermath.
When one thinks of imperialism they often refer to the concept with very strong feelings. The general population will either agree with it or disagree. There tends to be no middle ground. The best way to look at imperialism is with an impartial mind. If one looks at imperialism with an open mind then they are able to see both the strengths and the weaknesses that it harbors. Throughout history one is most likely able to name several circumstances where imperialism took place and also point out the obvious aftermath of. Imperialism tends to have a greater good behind it, but unfortunately may have been executed poorly.
In the past, lives were controlled by European imperialism the practice of a country extending its political power, over conquered territories. The country and the lands it controls were called an empire. The empire enforced its rule on people of different cultures, ethnic backgrounds, and different political systems. The empire had one supreme ruler; sadly, the conquered territories lack effective representation in the empire’s government. Therefore, the conquered countries natural raw natural resources were exploited and their economic growth suppressed. This was evident in Africa, South Asia, Latin America, and North America countries.
Rudyard Kipling’s poem “The White Man’s Burden” articulates the imperialism of the English empire into India, Cambodia, China, and Africa. The English thought it their duty to go out and take over these barbaric nations to civilize them. They justified their act of westernizing and destroying others’ cultures as the “burden’ they were born to bear. “And when your goal is nearest the end for others sought, watch sloth and heathen folly bring all your hopes to nought.” They blamed the ineffectiveness of their efforts on the native’s laziness. They are the ones whose whole world is being flipped upside down; being submerged in a new culture with new laws and strange people. Yet, somehow they are the lazy ones and despite the trails for the white man at the end of the day it is beneficial to the savages.
Introduction: The epoch of imperialism cannot be defined simply as a proliferation of inflated egos tied to the hardened opinions of nationalists, but also a multi-faceted global rivalry with roots of philosophies tainted with racism and social Darwinism. The technique of each imperialist was specific to the motivations and desires of each combative, predominantly Western power and subsequently impacted the success of each imperialist and its colonies. Driven by industrialization, Europeans are aware of the urgent need for raw materials and new markets to maintain a constant rate of expansion and wealth. Imperialism became a competition; in general, the European countries led with fervor while the non-Western regions deemed likely to be stepped on.
There is a point of time in certain a country’s history where they become dominant and more powerful than ever before. During this elongated process a country becomes an empire. The British and the Ottomans were states that succeeded in this process, but becoming an empire such as theirs required vast amounts of political and social maneuvering to expand their boundaries, called imperialism. Imperialism is, “a policy of extending a country's power and influence through diplomacy or military force”. By becoming a modern nation enjoying economic prosperity and political stability, the British and the Ottomans created an imperialistic impact over the globe with distinctive motivations and approaches especially during the transition period of gaining ample amount power and influence globally.
In the essay ?Shooting an Elephant? by George Orwell, the author uses metaphors to represent his feelings on imperialism, the internal conflict between his personal morals, and his duty to his country. Orwell demonstrates his perspectives and feelings about imperialism.and its effects on his duty to the white man?s reputation. He seemingly blends his opinions and subjects into one, making the style of this essay generally very simple but also keeps it strong enough to merit numerous interpretations. Orwell expresses his conflicting views regarding imperialism throughout the essay by using three examples of oppression and by deliberatly using his introspection on imperialism.
After the prosperity of the industrial revolution, nations/states started competing for world power by extending their influence beyond their borders. Industrialization and technology created a sense of limitlessness and as a result, societies were no longer bounded by geography, morality, resources and technological constraints. European imperialism is a product of this sense of limitlessness. Nations began to compete for power and increased their influence through the exploitation of other countries. In the novels, Heart of Darkness by Joseph Conrad and All Quiet on the Western Front by Erich Maria Remarque, both authors demonstrate how imperialism and war were driven by the ideologies of capitalism and nationalism. Although imperialism
Beginning in the 1850’s, European states engaged in an intense scramble for overseas territories. This “new imperialism” led Europeans to carve up parts of Asia and nearly all of Africa and create colonial empires. Within these empires, European states exercised complete political control over the indigenous societies and regularly redrew political boundaries to meet their needs. During the scramble for new markets and territories, the indigenous peoples were often subjugated, dominated and marginalized. In return, countries in Africa and Asia gained the technology and capital that, over a period of time and development, improved their quality of life. Justifying imperialistic actions often caused tensions in political, economic, and social spheres of influence during late modernity.
Imperialism of the twentieth century saw the rise of something that would forever affect the world around it. It is relevant to today’s world because it provides a unique perspective on world history. It represents the traditional battle between several culture and legislative ideals. Imperialism is, furthermore, at the root of many of the world’s greatest conflicts, including, to some extent, the infamous Cold War. Therefore, when studying any of those conflicts, someone today must understand imperialism in an effort to understand its unique threat. Furthermore, imperialism is important today because, though it is thought to have become extinct, it still exists. It does not exist in its traditional form (i.e., the warfare developed
No force has had a greater impact on modern nations and their cultures than imperialism. Imperialism is a policy of extending a nation’s rule over foreign areas by acquiring and holding colonies. During the nineteenth century in particular, imperialism became a trend among wealthy European nations such as Great Britain, France, and Italy, as countries competed to gain resources and expand their empires. In enforcing these policies, imperial powers spread numerous effects over the span of the globe. The question is, were the effects of imperialism beneficial or detrimental to the colonized nations? For the nation of Somalia, it is clear that imperialism was nothing but a perversion of justice, as their bloody post-independence history in particular shows when compared with the peace that existed pre-imperialism. The British and Italian imperial policies proved destructive to the nation of Somalia, as shown by the current absence of governmental stability, lack of economic prosperity, and increasing ethnic conflict.
Imperialism is a policy of a country spreading their power and influence with diplomacy or military force. The act of imperialism is widespread across the world because of three main motives. These motives consist of political, religious, and economic factors involved in the expansion of the industrial nations. These imperialists weren’t necessarily evil. The main reason nations participated in imperialism was because they had strong feelings of nationalism, and felt it needed to be spread to weaker countries. Some decided imperialism was a way to spread their religious beliefs. Imperialism is terrible, and the nations who participated in it did terrible things to others. However, no matter how awful the imperialists were to foreigners imperialism
Imperialism has had a profound effect on the world that cannot be underestimated. While the flags of European powers no longer fly over countries and the sun finally sets on the Union Jack, the scars of colonialism are still present. During the centuries of European globalization many viewed colonialism not only as a necessity for the economic power, but also for the expansion of sciences, and political power. This view was supported by many intellectuals during the height of the British empire including Herbert Spencer who defended it scientifically, philosophically, and politically but also by Rudyard Kipling who defended the cause artistically. Only in recent times has the west been able to truly discover the horrors
Imperialism sprung from an altruistic and unselfish aim to "take up the white man's burden"1 and “wean [the] ignorant millions from their horrid ways.”2 These two citations are, of course, from Kipling’s “White Man’s Burden” and Conrad’s Heart of Darkness, respectively, and they splendidly encompass what British and European imperialism was about – at least seen from the late-nineteenth century point of view. This essay seeks to explore the comparisons and contrasts between Conrad’s and Kipling’s view of imperialism in, respectively, Heart of Darkness and “White Man’s Burden” and “Recessional.”