The Great Schism Of 1054: A Comparative Analysis

1173 Words3 Pages

It was on July 16, 1054 at the church of Hagia Sofia that the legate Cardinal Humbert delivered the letter of excommunication. While this was not an official letter signed by the pope, it is recognized as the end of the unified church and the beginning of the Eastern and Western churches (Norwich 2011, 99). Moreover, the Great Schism of 1054 is commonly known for separating the unified Christian Church into Eastern Orthodoxy and Western Catholicism. Although this event was unexpected, tensions had been increasing since Rome entered its Dark Age nearly five-hundred years before (Cairns 1996, 196). The invasion of the Germanic tribes not only changed geographical and regional boundaries, but also highlighted cultural and theological differences. …show more content…

Muslim land surrounded Western and Eastern regions [to the East and West respectively]. Muslim influence was not predominant as the topography had numerous mountains that prevented contact. Though Muslim influence did not impact the Schism of 1054, it did prevent the proliferation of Christianity. In addition, both churches had a separate and unique geographic disposition. Historians note that the founding of Constantinople opened the door to the Schism of 1054 as it divided the East and the West and exclusively served Greek culture. Constantinople was viewed as the political capital of the East and Rome was the capital of the West (Cairns 1996, 119). Emperors of each region had distinct views of secularism and needed to reform their state’s religion to conform to their political agenda. Governance in the East resisted the pope’s want for greater political power. Finally, the Norman conquest of southern Italy affirmed that geographical differences would have large impacts on the unified Church (Dennis, 1990). The unified Christian Church maintained a harmony between state and religion, but as culture and technology began to develop in the Western Europe the need for their religion to change followed. Ultimately, against the will of the Greeks the Pope began to impose strict reforms to the unified Christian …show more content…

The Roman emperor was constantly trying to extend his own authority. This was made difficult because at the same time the Pope was trying to increase his own political power. However, the Byzantines of the East viewed the pope as primus inter pares meaning “among the patriarchs” (Norwich 2011, 97). Initially, this limited the pope’s potential to gain political power in the East. By the mid eighth century, the Germanic influence flourished in the West. To the Greek’s detriment, the Germanic people viewed the Pope as “Rex Romanōrum” meaning “King of the Romans” (“Great”, n.d). Ultimately, the Eastern people accepted the pope and allowed him to gain greater power and preside over Christendom. The Western society was based on a strict hierarchical order, while the Greeks had a “love for theological discussion” (Norwich 97, 2011). However, the pope’s quest for universal jurisdiction was refuted by the Byzantines. In addition, the Pope sought greater political authority, and for him to gain power in the East would result in an increase of political power in his church. To his demise, he never was able to extend rule through Byzantium as they did not want to be ruled by a foreign leader. Ultimately, the schism settled their conflicting views before other potential resolution could

Open Document