Great Schism Dbq

878 Words2 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: Eastern Orthodox – Roman Catholic ecclesiastical differences wikipedia

With excommunications of both the Patriarch and the Pope, a Great Schism was brought about that would change two empires forever. There were many issues that created the Great
Schism between the east and the west both before 1054 and after. It would appear from the documents that the east had more issues with how the west was conducting and controlling religion through the governing of the church.
Prior to 1054, the Catholic issues revolved greatly around the abandonment of the
Catholic empire by bishops of the west. The west was looking to restore their empire as bishops left and headed east to Constantinople. Pope John VIII requested by “papal authority” that the incoming bishops should not be allowed to perform any ordinations, and should they be allowed to perform the east …show more content…

The eastern orthodox also believed that the catholics were going against the scripture, making their own rules up rather than following the set of rules God had set for them (Document 8). For both churches, the priorities and ways of governing the church are totally different. The eastern Orthodox churches have two patriarchs while the Catholics have one pope. The Orthodox citizens have come to a conclusion at this point in the schism that there is no hope for the churches rejoining if the catholics can not accept the ways of their religion (Document 6). There was also the point of geography in the schism. Should the east had accepted union with the west, they would become a part of the west. The eastern orthodox had issues with this as they did not like the idea of abandoning their empire of Byzantium to become a part of the west (Document 7).
Through all of the time before and after the Great Schism, the issues present after the war had the greatest impact on the schism, keeping it around for a very long time. Between the church encouraging its members to fight against the Orthodox by telling them they would

Show More
Related

  • Massachusetts Bay Colony Dbq

    695 Words  | 2 Pages

    They did not want to separate from their church. Thy wanted to make themselves, and their church pure, or free of fault.

    Read More

  • The First Crusades Analysis

    1928 Words  | 4 Pages

    The First Crusade is often cited as one of the most damnable consequences of religious fanaticism. A careful inspection of the circumstances and outcomes, however, will reveal a resultant political restructuring of Europe under the banner of Christendom. The purpose of this investigation is to investigate Pope Urban II’s motives in initiating the First Crusade, with a particular focus on the consolidation of the Western Church’s influence in Europe. Among the primary sources that will be consulted are the letter sent by Patriach Alexios of Constantinople to Urban, and an account of Urban’s speech at Clermont. Relevant excerpts from both of these primary sources, as well as contextual evidence and a wide array of historiography, will be taken

    Read More

  • Origins of the Catholic Church in Australia.

    1794 Words  | 4 Pages

    ...of the clergy, almost always condemning the laity to hell for even the most minor things. Once, the relationship between us and the clergy was rather formal, as many of the religious felt they were superior that us. This all changed after Vatican II as it liberated the church.

    Read More

  • Cathlocism Versus Protestanism

    908 Words  | 2 Pages

    One difference between Catholicism and Protestantism is the question of adequacy and authorization of the Scripture. Protestants, being more traditional, focus on the Bible. They believe that it is the source of God’s revelation to man (“What”), and that “the whole of Christian truth is found within the Bible’s pages” (“Tracts”). Bible teaches one about their wrongs, and what actions they need to undertake in order to be saved from their sins. They see it as guidelines for Christian behavior. These guidelines are otherwise known as “sola scriptura” (“What”). Sola scriptura derives from “sola” meaning “alone” and “scriptura” meaning “writings.” “Sola scriptura” says that only the Scripture is responsible for the faith of Christians and their practices. The Scripture is the foundation of their religion. It tells one that their salvation is not obtained from random readings, but from the document itself. However, the Catholics rebuff the teachings of the Scripture. Many of their documents such as praying to saints, worship of Mary, etc. are focused only on the Roman Catholic traditions. They do not believe that the Bible alone will satisfy them. Instead, they believe that the Roman Catholic tradition alongside with the Bible are both mandatory for oneself. Both determine the sufficiency of the Bible as well as its authority and completeness (“What”).

    Read More

  • What are the differences between the Indian religion and Catholicism?

    1307 Words  | 3 Pages

    Next there is the major difference in scriptures that are read. In Catholicism there is one book, I am sure that we all have heard of it, the Bible. In Catholicism it is made up of the Old Testament and the New Testament. The Old Testament is made up of scriptures before the coming of Jesus. The New Testament is made up of scriptures written up after the coming of Jesus.

    Read More

  • Enlightenment: The Light Bulb Of The 1700s

    411 Words  | 1 Pages

    But the church did not see it that way. The church believed that the only way to

    Read More

  • 1450-1750 Eastern Asian Relations With Europe

    787 Words  | 2 Pages

    The East Asians, mostly China and Japan, both were trying to become or stay a great power, and did it different ways. Japan tried to isolate themselves by only allowing limited contact and no spreading of Christianity, as was talked about in document sixteen. China tried to keep up with them by using a strong legal system as was mentioned in document six, and government set up like the monarchs of Europe, in that the power is passed from father to son, as seen in document five.

    Read More

  • Western Imperialism and Modern East Asia

    1194 Words  | 3 Pages

    Ebrey, Patricia , Anne Walthall, and James Palais. "The Age of Western Imperialism." Modern East Asia From 1600. Second Edition ed. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Company, 2009. 295-367. Print.

    Read More

  • The Great Schism Of 1054: A Comparative Analysis

    1173 Words  | 3 Pages

    Constantinople was viewed as the political capital of the East and Rome was the capital of the West (Cairns 1996, 119). Emperors of each region had distinct views of secularism and needed to reform their state’s religion to conform to their political agenda. Governance in the East resisted the pope’s want for greater political power. Finally, the Norman conquest of southern Italy affirmed that geographical differences would have large impacts on the unified Church (Dennis, 1990). The unified Christian Church maintained a harmony between state and religion, but as culture and technology began to develop in the Western Europe the need for their religion to change followed.

    Read More

  • The Gothic Age

    1879 Words  | 4 Pages

    spirit of rivalry to have a more glorious church than the others. It was as if

    Read More

  • Comparing the Han Dynasty and the Roman Empire

    2784 Words  | 6 Pages

    The Han Dynasty and the Roman Empire were two grand empires that rose out of preexisting territories and provided relative peace over wide areas. The collapse of the Qin Dynasty (221-206 BCE), which was the first great land-based empire in East Asia, came after a period of war, confusion, and tyrannical rule. Due to the political disorder that stemmed from the early dynastic activity, the emergence of the Han Dynasty (206 BCE- 228 CE) sprung to focus on restoring order. On the other hand, the rise of the Roman Empire (44 BCE- 476 CE) originated from consolidating authority over aristocratic landlords and overriding the democratic elements of the earlier Republic. Instead, the Roman Empire redefined the concept of “citizen” as subjects to the Roman emperor. Both empires shared similar agendas to exploit their vast territories and resources, which helped them expand their political dominance; however, despite having similar political goals and foundations, their government system, cultural ideologies and imperial expansionist natures diverged.

    Read More

  • Why did the Great Divergence Occur

    1372 Words  | 3 Pages

    Hobson, J. M., 2004. The Eastern Origins of Western Civilisation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 57

    Read More

  • Roman Catholic Church vs Eastern Orthodox Church

    927 Words  | 2 Pages

    Although the Roman Catholic Church and the Eastern Orthodox Church ultimately had more differences which ended up causing their split, they once had quite a few a similarities. The churches shared “many of the same prayers and liturgies” (“Eastern Orthodox”, 2001 para.1). Both the Eastern and Western churches had a difference in opinion in defining and numbering sacraments but they did agree on what the seven major sacraments for their churches should be. They also agreed upon that the male clergy should consist of bishops, priests, and deacons.

    Read More

  • Renaissance and Reformation

    797 Words  | 2 Pages

    ...y the catholic leaders held meetings in Trent for 18 years and examined catholic religion. The only real change that they actually made was indulgences were no longer for sale but were given.

    Read More

  • Eastern And Western Schism Essay

    1422 Words  | 3 Pages

    It was a Saturday on July 16th 1054 when Cardinal Humbert, the legate of Pope Leo IX, walked into the cathedral of Hagia Sophia where he approached the main altar. On the altar he placed a parchment that declared the Patriarch of Constantinople to be excommunicated from the church. Then he stormed out of the church and left the city entirely because he insisted that the Patriarch recognize Rome's claim to be the head and mother of the church. A week later, Patriarch Michael Cerularius had firmly decided to have the cardinal excommunicated. Centuries later, this dramatic incident was thought to mark the beginning of the schism between the Latin and the Greek churches. In addition, this division still separates Roman Catholics and Eastern Orthodox. However, no scholar on both sides maintains that the schism actually began in 1054. The validity of the Western legates' act is doubtful, since Pope Leo had died and Cerularius' excommunication applied only to the legates personally. Still, the Church split along doctrinal, theological, linguistic, political, and geographical lines, and the fundamental breach has never been healed. Sometimes, each side accuses the other of having fallen into heresy and of having initiated the division. As a result, the Great Schism is considered to have formed because of the political differences, the theological differences The Crusades, and the attempts of Reconciliation.

    Read More

More about Great Schism Dbq

Open Document