Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Learning styles assessment paper
Learning styles assessment paper
Learning styles questionnaire
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Learning styles assessment paper
The CPI is a longer assessment of 462 questions. This assessment is a self-report inventory that helps individuals gain a clearer picture of their characterizes and thinking styles. The assessment is broken up in two sections the profiles for validity and the personological modes or quadrants. The validity profiles are broken up into an expansive amount of categories; but the ones individuals need to take notice of are the ones that fall above or below the standard t-score results. In this section of the assessment the categories that stuck out to me for being above the standard t-scores are: dominance (Do), self-acceptance (Sa), independence (In), empathy (Em), achievement via independence (Ai) and flexibility (Fx). In a nutshell what these …show more content…
The overall picture I gain from this is that I am: shy and uneasy in social settings, I resist rules and regulations and find it hard to conform. I also tend to have strong feelings and emotions and do not make an attempt to mask them. I also insist on being myself in all situations and I am action orientated and I take initiative. These results are not surprising to me and I can picture little ways I do each of these. For instance with the self-control, I often refuse to walk on sidewalks on college campuses because it annoys me that everyone does so when there is perfectly good grass to walk on. People simply walk on them in my opinion, because they refuse to break from the set way of doing things. In the next section of the CPI I scored as an Alpha on the quadrant grid meaning that I am dependable, outgoing and enterprising. Though I was close to being a Gamma-who are adventurous, restless, and pleasure seeking. I can see both of these quadrants as holding bits of my personality. I think because I tread the line so much on both of these that I will switch back and forth depending on what the situation entails. As for the levels of realization, I scored a 4 or an average integration and realization of
Have you ever wondered why you react to situations in the manner to you do? Whether you are calm and collect, or rigid and boisterous, the way you react to life is linked to your personality. Many different models exist to determine your personality type using answers from a series of questions or selecting between two opposing options. The most popularly used assessment is the Myers-Briggs Indicator Type test, which is based off the foundation of C. G. Jung’s work on personality types. The typology in the Myers-Briggs Indicator Type test yields results that determine if the person is introverted (I) or extraverted (E), sensing (S) or intuitive (N), thinking (T) or feeling (F), and judging (J) or perceiving (P). Each of these types corresponds
When I took the MBTI, some of the things I knew about myself were reinforced, and I also learned some new things about myself and my personality. The four letter code that I received was ISTJ, representing introversion, sensing, thinking, and judging. I expected each of these preferences, and when I read the definition of each, it further strengthened my understanding of what my personality really means in “technical terms.” My four letter code came with titles such as the Duty Fulfiller, the Responsible Realist and the Inspector, names I also agree that pertain to myself. Some of the attributes of an ISTJ personality type include serious and quiet, dependable, well-organized, hard-working, goal-striving, determined, logic-based, orderly, and traditional. If I were asked to describe myself, I would more than likely use nearly all of these terms to do so, which goes to show how accurate this test was, for me at least. But, I also can pick out some challenges that may arise because of the personality type that I am. One example relates to being an introvert, who prefer to focus on one thing at a time.
In the Open-Mindedness personality section, my percentile is a 7. I’m more close-minded, meaning I tend to be conventional, down to earth, narrow interests, uncreative, and I prefer traditional and familiar experiences. In the Conscientiousness personality section, my percentile is an 87. I’m more conscientiousness, meaning I am reliable, well-organized, self-disciplined, careful; reliable, well-organized, self-disciplined, careful, very well-organized, and can be relied upon. When it comes to the Extraversion personality section, my percentile is a 7. I’m introverted, meaning I tend to be shy, reserved, inhibited, quiet, and I probably enjoy spending quiet time alone. When it comes to the Agreeableness personality section, I scored a 78. I tend to be agreeable, meaning I tend to be good natured, sympathetic, forgiving, and courteous. Finally, when it comes to the Negative Emotionality personality section, my percentile is 67. I’m a little bit more nervous/High Strung than Calm/Relaxed.
When thinking about my personality in regard to different personality theories, I felt that I could most relate to the humanistic theory. Carl Rogers described self-concept as a collection of beliefs about one's own nature, unique qualities and typical behavior. My self-concept is that I'm an easy-going, nice guy. If something happens that upsets me, I am pretty laid back about it and deal with it gradually. I like the fact that I'm easy going, and I don't want to suddenly start showing a temper or overreacting about things that I know I can get past calmly. Rogers also stressed the fact that our self-concept may not always be accurate. I like to think that I'm an intelligent human, but when others see my transcript, for example, they may think otherwise. But, on the other hand, when I am in a situation that I know a lot about, like hunting, another might think I am very intelligent. Others' view...
“The CPP Fund has a critical purpose – to help Canadians build financial security in retirement. CPPIB’s long-term objective is to invest the Fund assets to maximize returns without undue risk of loss having regard to the factors that may affect the funding of the CPP.” – from CPPIB 2017 Annual Report
reveal aspects of an individual character or psychological makeup. Carl Jung was a psychiatrist best known for theories of the Collective Unconscious, in this assignment I took the personality test that Carl Jung created based off personality and behavior. When completing the test my personality trait revealed to me as ISFJ with an individual preference in four dimensions characterizing my personality type including Introvert (12%), Sensing (16%), Feeling (53%), and Judging (9%). After reading the analysis of each preference I noticed that I have a few similarities that relates to my personal life and wellbeing
There is so many different personalities in the world, and how boring would it be if we all acted the same. “Every society and social group has values, experiences, and understandings that are widely shaped among members but may not be endorsed by those outside of the culture or group” (Wood, 2016, p.54). This is your personal identity , which is how you choose to live your life and what you stand for. Your idenity can be shared closly with other people. However, your personality is uniquily your own, this is the way you have decided to represent your idenity (Hontoy, 2015). I learned that I am an ESTJ type, extravert (19%), sensing (12%), thinking (1%), and judging (44%). Some of the concepts that I read about my personality type I recognized in myself and some opened my eyes to new concepts about myself (Humanmetrics, 2016).
Within the Jung Typology Test (JTT) it states that my type of personality is introverted, sensing, feeling and judging. The results indicated I am an introvert over extrovert, the score showed 56%. There was a marginal or no preference to sensing over intuition at 1% for this result. Moderate preference to feeling over thinking at 25%, and a strong preference to judging over perceiving at 78%. So this is saying that I am an introverted sensing with extroverted feeling.
Having completed the Myers Briggs Personality Test previously, I was identified as an INTP, which stands for introverted, intuitive, thinking, and perceiving. Accordingly, this personality is often labeled as “The Architect” or “The Logician.” Despite my previous results, I repeated the test as instructed in the assignment. Consequently, based on the outcome of the test, my personality has altered in the past year. Thus, my updated results based on this analysis were, INTJ (introverted, intuitive, thinking, and judging). However, the two personalities are not vastly different, as only one trait seems to have varied. Therefore, instead of a holding characteristic grounded in perception, it would appear that I am more inclined to mannerisms
With the conscientiousness category I was rated with a 58 percentile, stating I was neither organized nor disorganized. This is supposed to state weather you are able to show self-disciple and aim for high success. Which I totally disagree with because I feel as though I am the most disorganized person of all time and can never remember where I place things or can find them if that. Furthermore, I also disagreed because I find myself as a very well disciplined individual with structure and set high priorities for myself in my life to become successful. In addition, I did not quite agree with the category of openness to experience/Intelligent. As Rentfrow states, this category is supposed to say weather you have an appraising art, sentiment, voyage and unique concepts (Rentfrow). I had scored a 20 percentile stating that I have narrow interest and uncreative. Although I might be a tad bit of an uncreative side to myself, I don’t agree however it stating I have narrow interest, because I feel as though I always think out of the box about things and try and figure out problems before they even occur. For the most part of the personality test I would have to agree with what it is stating, especially for being an online data test it sure is precise on how it describes my personality as a single
I ended up receiving INFJ (the rarest personality type [1% of the human population!]!), so I was pretty stoked about that. Specifically I was 79% introverted, 88% intuitive, 75% feeling, and 71% judging. Not to mention, I was up there with the greats: MLK, Nelson Mandela, Morgan Freeman, Goethe, and last but *certainly* not least, Jon Snow, so I feel that I definitely deserve INFJ bragging rights. I was not too surprised with most of my results. According to my chart, I was soft-spoken yet with strong opinions, insightful, sensitive, and highly imaginative. I prefer working inside my head or a few people rather than in large groups of people, (which is another reason why office hours scare me). I match my idealist goals with my determination and passion into creating change in my community, and I look to make meaningful and long-lasting connections with a select few who share my values, interests, and dreams. (Many apologies if it sounds like I’m “gassing myself up” right now. I’m really not trying to inflate my
The first person I asked was a cousin whom I’ve been close too since infantancy. After I explained to him what each category meant he scored me with the following: open mindedness at 70, conscientiousness at 15, extraversion at 90, agreeableness at 25, and negative emotionality at 20. The one area that was an outlier is agreeableness. Ironically, this is the cousin who broke my spiderman toy years ago as mentioned before and he remembers how I held a grudge for such a long time because of it. When it comes to the similarities the reasons he gave matched up with mine which I assumed would happen. Extraversion was ranked the highest by him because he’s the main person I hangout with so there was some bias in that field. My other assessment came from a teammate who I didn’t meet until August 2017. As expected his assessment had some differences than the one from before. When asked to score my personality he gave the following results: open mindedness at 40, conscientiousness at 25, extraversion at 60, agreeableness at 50, and negative emotionality at 10. Throughout all three evaluations the one consistent rating was found in negative emotionality. This isn’t surprising, I’ve been told that I’m a calm person by most people I encounter. What did surprise me was how lowly extraversion was
I took five personality assessments to see what personalities seem to define who I am. I agree with some of the results, but some I don’t agree with at all. These assessments tend to mostly be accurate, however, some aren't who I am.
Personally, I consider myself as an adoring, kind-hearted and determined person. I’m respectful and caring to everyone around me. I pursue my goals to the end and I never rest until I accomplish them. I 'm confident that my companions would depict me as a compassionate and kind individual. I believe others see me as a steadfast individual who is obliging of others. They would also consider me competitive since I am aggressive when in pursuit of a target. My coworkers think of me as a problem solver, because I am very logical. I am also humble and generous. I love to give back to those in need. My friends view me as a free spirit, creative and imaginative person. They also see me as being very sociable and outgoing. I’m huge
“Always be yourself, express yourself, have faith in yourself, do not go out and look for a successful personality and duplicate it” (Bruce Lee). Since starting college, I have noticed more about my personality each and every day. By taking the MBTI test in theology class and now the big five inventory. I have felt myself connecting more and more to find out who I really am. I think before I came here, I was lost in the type of personality I was and felt designed to be the person I felt my parents wanted me to be. I have yet to change much based on these results, but I’m content on being the person I am and wouldn’t change it for the world. My scores for The Big Five Dimension weren’t surprising at all. My extraversion, openness levels