Synchronisation Of Rowing

807 Words2 Pages

There are three major components in the rowing system which is the rower, the shell (i.e the boat and the oar (Baudouin and Hawkins, 2004). Based on Colloud et al. (2006), rowing is a cyclic movement that can be separated into two well defined phases, drive (i.e. known as propulsion) recovery. By referring to the upper limb and lower limb joint, they noted that the drive phase begins at the catch position (i.e full flexion of the lower limb and lumbar joints and full extension of the upper limb joints) and ends at the finish position (i.e. full extension of the lower limb and lumbar joints and full flexion of the upper limb joints). They added that the recovery phase is the return of the rower from the finish position to the catch position …show more content…

Men’s Coxed Pair) (Hill H., 2002). The researchers, coaches and rowers were agreed that by performing perfect synchrony, optimal performance of the crew can be achieved (O’Brien C., 2011). In fact, to execute perfect synchronisation, it is takes for several years of training particularly for inexperienced crews because they have some difficulties row in a common rhythm (Cuijpers et al., 2015). However, Cuijpers et al., 2015 stressed that the rowers with highly skilled in technically and strong individually are probably not win the race if they do not properly coordinate their movements together. Indeed, as theoretically, an out-of-phase or anti-phase crew coordination pattern (i.e. not synchronise) be able minimise the power lost to velocity fluctuations of the boat (Brearley et al., 1998) within the rowing cycle, which may enhance average boat velocity (De Brouwer et al., 2013). Moreover, in previous studies, De Brouwer et al., 2013 found that anti-phase crew coordination was less accurate and less consistent compared to conventional in-phase crew coordination. Interestingly, the transition into in-phase coordination is occurs, when the rowers start coordinating in anti-phase pattern by increasing the movement frequency (Schmidt et al., …show more content…

(2011), traditional ergometers are stationary (i.e. known as fixed ergometer) that the rower moves respectively to the resistance unit. However, they stated that the dynamic ergometers (i.e. known as slides ergometer) are the best simulation on-water rowing in which all parts of the ergometer moves in response to the motion of the athlete. Additionally, both types of ergometers were used by rowers for training, evaluation and team selection (Shazlin and Sunil, 2015). In recent, the most used rowing ergometer is the Concept II rather than among the existing models (Elliot et al., 2002) which led the market since the development of the II b model in 1986 (Smith and Hopkins, 2012). The similar biomechanics have shown on dynamic ergometry and sculling (i.e. on-water rowing) (Elliot et al., 2002) as notice that shorter drive lengths and higher handle forces during ergometry than sculling (Kleshnev, 2005). Besides, biomechanical analysis shown that the stroke profile in slide rowing differs from stationary rowing as the max and mean forces during slide rowing are lower and stroke frequency is higher at the same work intensity (Larsen and Jensen, 2010). The previous studies observed that the rowers were generated lower stroke forces and higher stroke rates during dynamic than stationary ergometry (Colloud et al., 2006). They reported that significant difference in force curve profiles which is handle and stretcher force during slides ergometer and

More about Synchronisation Of Rowing

Open Document