Similarities Between Carnal Knowledge And The Marriage Of A Young Stockbroker

Changing cultural attitudes were also reflected in film. The films Carnal Knowledge and The Marriage of a Young Stockbroker represented women in roles that were harmful to them and illustrated the injustices women faced. Carnal Knowledge demonized men who objectified women; their objectification left them empty. The Marriage of a Young Stockbroker tells the story of a problematic marriage in which the main character becomes obsessed with voyeurism. Throughout the film women are continually objectified. There’s a woman in the film who has feminist ideas but she is quickly repressed. The couple reconciles with sex. These films are not an example of a perfect society but are critical of attitudes and actions in which women are objectified. The

Carnal Knowledge is about sex without relationships or sex without eroticism; these are the only subjects the main characters interact over. This objectification and sexism in the film eventually lead to a meaningless existence for, the main characters, Sandy and Jonathan. Susan, a prominent character at the beginning of the film, has some sexual freedom but seemingly forgets her ambitions to be a lawyer and marries Sandy after college. She she isn’t an important character for the remainder of the film. The women in the film have little personhood and are only seen through the eyes of the men in Carnal Knowledge. Neither Jonathan nor Sandy is able to sustain relationships with women long-term. Both men objectify women; Jonathan calls women “ballbusters” and treats women as the lesser sex and Sandy puts women on a

Both Carnal Knowledge and The Marriage of a Young Stockbroker portray dysfunctional relationships. Both films reflect poorly on the men in them. Sandy, Jonathan, and William are all self-destructive in the relationships they are in. Their objectification of women causes unhappiness and unfulfilled lives. They are examples of films that grapple with tough subject matter and shed light on societal issues. Alternative arguments posit that the women’s movement was a side effect of World War Two. Women needed to work when men were abroad fighting. Women entering the workforce could also be said to be a result of people’s realization of the American dream through two incomes (“The 1960s-70s American Feminist Movement”). In turn, this created the emerging upper middle