Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Why felon voting should be allowed
Should felons who have completed their sentence be allowed to vote
Should felons who have completed their sentence be allowed to vote
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Why felon voting should be allowed
Some of the greatest thinker’s business men/women, and owners has a record. Rather it's being arrested for guilty by association, murder, and etc. Even with degrees some of them will still be put behind bars. Anything can happen at any given moment. Even some of them who has a felony did a three sixty turn around and started their own business or became president of a business or congress. The only question is who would they vote for and why would they vote for them? In certain states if you have a felony you can vote after you did your time, depending on how many felonies you have on record, and etc. I believe felons should have a right to vote if they want to vote. They should have an option on do they want to vote or not. Why? Well let's look at it like this. Let's say …show more content…
Giving you 3-5 years. When you know you’re innocent and when you know depending on your skin color. You could get life. But was given 3-5 years. When you get out of jail depending on where you are. You can't vote for a certain amount of years. You know you can't vote, but you see 2 presidential candidates. One candidate you know for sure would be great as president. But you can't vote because of your record. That's where I believe you should be able to if the judge gives you an option to vote or since you served your years you have to wait for a month to vote. Yes, people are going to judge you because of your record. Some may put your record over the degree you work so hard for. So many things can turn sideways even if you have a college degree. If the judge nice enough they could give you a limit amount of time and you can take it to the state to see what they say. A felon is still a human being that should have an option (depending on what they did). You just have to put yourself in their shoes just for once when it around voting time. They could be given years for somebody else's dirty work. Or they can be smarter than you even known to be. Example is Charles
Most black Americans are under the control of the criminal justice today whether in parole or probation or whether in jail or prison. Accomplishments of the civil rights association have been challenged by mass incarceration of the African Americans in fighting drugs in the country. Although the Jim Crow laws are not so common, many African Americans are still arrested for very minor crimes. They remain disfranchised and marginalized and trapped by criminal justice that has named them felons and refuted them their rights to be free of lawful employment and discrimination and also education and other public benefits that other citizens enjoy. There is exists discernment in voting rights, employment, education and housing when it comes to privileges. In the, ‘the new Jim crow’ mass incarceration has been described to serve the same function as the post civil war Jim crow laws and pre civil war slavery. (Michelle 16) This essay would defend Michelle Alexander’s argument that mass incarcerations represent the ‘new Jim crow.’
One of the problems with the law is its principle of removing judicial discretion. This severely hinders a judge's ability to make a punishment fit the crime. While some felons deserve life in prison, it is unfair to create a standard that would force judges to sentence offenders to life imprisonment for relatively minor crimes.
What if one day you weren't allowed to voice your opinion about the people who run our country your country in other words if you couldn’t vote? A lot of people don’t vote, but what if you didn’t even have the right to do so? In 12 states, ex-felons aren’t allowed to vote even after serving their prison time. When you think of a felon you probably think of someone that has done terrible things and shouldn't have a voice in politics but that figure should be changed. One lady, by the name of Leola Strickland, isn’t allowed to vote because she has a felony on her record for postdating a few checks and having them bounce because she lost her job(1). Some people in our country can’t vote because they have felons for the same reason. They aren’t violent criminals, they just made a small mistake or two and now can’t
“Many people say that serious crime committers have shown they aren’t trustworthy” (Clegg). After a felon is released from prison, the expectation is that they will shape up and return to their lives, however most of their lives are completely changed. When a felon is released from prison, they should retain their same rights as a US citizen as well as their right to vote and serve in Jury Duty, because they served their time and cannot be held in double jeopardy, and are valuable assets to the country for work and less homelessness. When felons are released from prison, they should retain the same rights as the average US citizen as well as the right to vote. Nonviolent felons who have served time for more than a year for misdemeanors are unable to vote because their judgment can no longer be trusted.
Most politicians argue that because a felon has committed a crime that their judgment can no longer be trusted. Some believe that they gave up there civil liberties when they chose to commit a crime. However, with the exception of children and the mentally incompetent, people who have to live with the consequences of an election should have their opinion counted. Convicts lose their civil rights while incarcerated. Others who agree with felons regaining their voting rights argued that if they really could not be trusted to change then they should never be let out of prison. Although they lost their civil liberties w...
Many people believe that felons do not deserve the right to vote. For these people, voting is not an inherent right; rather it is a privilege given to deserving people that wish to make a positive change to their lives. Some believe that, “…there is no reason for a felon to vote or to debate about whether or not they have that right…they made the choice to break the law, so why should they have any say in making it?” {Siegel} In this point of view, giving felons the right to vote is similar to rewarding them. With the right to vote, felons are still able to sway decisions regarding the lives of a society they are no longer a part of. Felons are meant to be punished, stripped of numerous rights including that of voting. Punishments, then, are made to restrict a person, not give them more freedom and decision.
The whole idea of taking away a convicted felon’s voting rights started in Rome when they were the controlling empire. Nowadays, a majority of prisons throughout the United States are allowing felons to vote on who becomes the next president. Even though they have committed murder, rape, thievery, we blow off those thoughts and allow felons to have a say in who runs this beautiful country. So the question is, should we allow convicted felons to vote? Not a chance would I ever say yes into letting felons choose our next president! Would you want to stand next to a convicted felon as you vote? I have a hard time imagining this act.
In most states ex-felons are not allowed to vote. This takes away a large portion of the voting population because of how many ex-felons there are right now and the many more that will be in the future. Ex-felons may also have a very hard time finding a job or a place to live. Legally landlords are allowed to deny an ex-felon. In Carbondale Illinois rental properties owners “Home Rentals” does background checks to make sure that none of their potential renters are felons. If they are felons Home Rentals claims that they will deny them the privilege of living in one of their properties. Ex-felons may also have a hard time finding jobs. Not many employers are willing to employ ex-felons for the fear of more crime or less commitment. Though denying these ex-felons jobs will not help the economy, only giving them jobs can help that.
The United States of America has the world’s highest incarceration rates, for several reasons. The United States of America doesn’t necessarily possess any unique strict laws in comparison to other countries of the world, yet we still have the highest incarceration rate in the world. More federal level and state level prisons are built in order to control and hold more prisoners because most are reaching its full capacity. The United States of America’s “crime rates” increased about 40 years ago when there became a new focus in the areas of crime. The President of the United States of America at the time Richard Nixon used the term “a war on drugs” in order to shed light on public health due to substance abuse. Initially, these policies created
I personally think felons should be allowed in healthcare no and or buts about it if someone did their time without having their freedom already why make them feel like when theyre free they still have restrictions on their decision making. It brings down their convidence and i feel that sometimes that can be long-term damage for different individuals. Bringing down someones convidence in general makes them feel less of a person because they will always feel like they have to compete but in their minds they will always down themseleves because of this felon over their heads.They automacially assume that they cant and wont do it because of rejection .
According to the Oxford Index, “whether called mass incarceration, mass imprisonment, the prison boom, or hyper incarceration, this phenomenon refers to the current American experiment in incarceration, which is defined by comparatively and historically extreme rates of imprisonment and by the concentration of imprisonment among young, African American men living in neighborhoods of concentrated disadvantage.” It should be noted that there is much ambiguity in the scholarly definition of the newly controversial social welfare issue as well as a specific determination in regards to the causes and consequences to American society. While some pro arguments cry act as a crime prevention technique, especially in the scope of the “war on drugs’.
According to the Oxford Living Dictionaries, disenfranchisement is defined as "The state of being deprived of a right or privilege, especially the right to vote". Although many countries restrict felons from voting, the US is unique because it is virtually the only country that permanently strips felons of their right to vote (Manza and Uggen 2). "In Ancient Greece, the status of atimia [literally without honor, a form of disenfranchisement] was imposed upon criminal offenders. This status carried the loss of many citizenship rights, including the right to participate in the polis" (Manza and Uggen 1). Those who support the restoration of ex-felons rights may be wondering how people even allow this to happen. It is important to understand
In today's society, those with felonies are often discriminated upon because of their mistakes in life. There are those that have made mistakes and do not regret making them. There are also ones that are repeat offenders and have no intentions on changing. Then there are those that may have had clouded judgments and did not know any better. They were simply misguided and as a result, made a mistake in life that they must live with for the rest of their lives. They will have many obstacles that they must overcome, such as finding a job. Many often lose hope because of the strenuous amount of effort required in order to overcome these obstacles. They will often be known as dangerous, untrustworthy, and failures at best. But with hope and faith, they will overcome the obstacles and can live a normal life. I categorize myself as being one whom has made a mistake and is living with it. I try to make the most out of my life and learn from my mistakes. If there is one thing in my life that I can honestly say I believe in, it is change. I believe that anyone can change as long as their heart, mind, and soul is in the right place.
In today’s society, no other component of corrections has come under scrutiny than the meaning of parole. Parole’s focuses on the calculation of misrepresent citizens and the defendants' purpose of criminal sentencing. Society strongly believes that we need to end the fiction of parole and community safety. Twenty years ago, Congress abolished parole for federal criminal cases. However, Federal felons serve the sentence that was given by a judge and was subject to a small discount only for good behavior while in prison. Sentences are based primarily on the seriousness of the crime and an offender’s criminal history. The federal system achieves truth-in-sentencing without later compromising the parole board. Sentences are based on justice,
This scenario is played out every single minute in the United States. Potentially highly qualified individuals are immediately dismissed because of their past mistakes. That is why it is imperative for the United States Legislature to pass a law that would prohibit potential employers from asking an applicant about their convictions until after the initial application process.