Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
the history of voting rights essay
history of voting rights in the usa short essay
history of voting rights in the usa short essay
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: the history of voting rights essay
Individuals convicted of a felony should not lose their right to vote. The right to vote is a
birth right for citizens born in this country. This right is taken for granted by many and is
exercised by far too few. As the United States prepares for its 57th presidential election over five
million of its citizens will be denied their right to participate in the electoral process. Why would
such a large number of people be denied a constitutional right? They have been excluded from
voting because they have been convicted of a felony. A felony is usually considered any crime
that could lead to more than a year in prison. But states can often have differing views of what is
considered a felony or a misdemeanor. Such an important right should not be subject to the
whims of state legislatures. Laws that prohibit felons from voting are a punishment above and
beyond the one handed out by the judicial system.
There is no uniformity to the laws barring convicted felons from voting. Laws vary
greatly from state to state. Almost every state prevents incarcerated felons from voting. The
only exceptions are Maine and Vermont. While some states reinstate voting rights once a
person has been released from prison; more than thirty continue to disenfranchise these
individuals. Thirty one states prohibit those on probation for felony offenses from voting.
Thirty six states prohibit those on parole for felony crimes from voting in elections. Several of
these states will restore the voting rights of convicted felons once the probation and/or parole
have been completed. But some of our fellow citizens will have their right to vote permanently
revoked. The nation at a whole should be concerned abo...
... middle of paper ...
...ple University Press.
Jones, Ashby (2010). Should Felons Lose the Right to Vote? Retrieved from
http://blogs.wsj.com/law/2010/03/22/should-felons-lose-the-right-to-vote/.
Karlan, Pamela (2004). "Convictions and Doubts: Retribution, Representation, and the Debate
over Felon Disenfranchisement," Stanford Law Review, Vol. 56, No. 5,
Krajick, Kevin (2004). The Washington Post. Why Can't Ex-Felons Vote?
Lewis, Gregory (2004). Study Criticizes Laws on Felon Voting, Democrats, Blacks Hurt,
Analysis Says. South Florida Sun-Sentinel.
New York Times Editorial Board (2004). Felons and the Right to Vote. Retrieved from
http://www.nytimes.com/2004/07/11/opinion/felons-and-the-right-to-
Shakir, Faiz (2012). On MLK Day, Santorum Criticizes Romney for Undermining Voting
Rights. Retrieved from http://thinkprogress.org/justice/2012/01/16/404903/on-mlk-day-
Although establishing rights for many different members of society, the voting rights act isn’t the end of this concern. We can learn from history that the interpretation of voting rights will always be in question by some new player. The best we can do is to understand that voting rights in American history has had much to with time and place, thus the reason for the ongoing change in the interpretation.
In the United States 2.2 million citizens are incarcerated on felony charges. Laws in America prohibit felons from voting. As a result, on Election Day 5.3 million citizens of America are disenfranchised because of crimes they once committed. Though they once broke the law, they have served their time and have been punished adequately in accordance with the American Justice System. Felons should regain full voting rights after their stint in prison.
Many people believe that felons do not deserve the right to vote. For these people, voting is not an inherent right; rather it is a privilege given to deserving people that wish to make a positive change to their lives. Some believe that, “…there is no reason for a felon to vote or to debate about whether or not they have that right…they made the choice to break the law, so why should they have any say in making it?” {Siegel} In this point of view, giving felons the right to vote is similar to rewarding them. With the right to vote, felons are still able to sway decisions regarding the lives of a society they are no longer a part of. Felons are meant to be punished, stripped of numerous rights including that of voting. Punishments, then, are made to restrict a person, not give them more freedom and decision.
Felon voting laws limit the restrictions for a felon to vote on any election. “Felon voting has not been federally regulated because some people argue that Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act can be tied to felon disenfranchisement and the Congress has the authority to legislate felon voting in federal elections.” Felon disenfranchisement is excluding people otherwise eligible to vote from voting due to conviction of a criminal offence, usually restricted to the more serious class of crimes, felonies. According to the National Conference of State Legislatures and The Sentencing Project, 1 in 40 adults were unable to vote due to a felony conviction in the 2008 elections. One purpose of the felon voting laws is the uncertainty of trusting
26, 2007 editorial "Another No Vote on Felons," published in the Washington Times: “Even in nearby Massachusetts, no stranger to progressivism, voters in 2000 supported a constitutional amendment to bar inmates from voting. The reason is clear: Most people think perpetrators of serious crimes have violated the public trust and cannot be permitted to help determine the future of the communities they harmed”. This view point is helpful to help undecided people see the potential harm of letting free convicted prisoners vote. Also, it is interesting how the very thought of convicted felons vote places such concern in the law abiding citizens’ thoughts. One may notice that particular past criminals may not have the best interest in what best for the community. Furthermore, one may notice that prisoners may be cut off from the events of the world, and wouldn’t have information to help them elect officials for the communities they may harmed. In, addition this may be true under the circumstance that some felons are not capable of making great choices for the community as a whole. As well as, if they have harmed the community they shouldn’t be able to vote on the wellbeing of the people they have
Criminal disenfranchisement is defined as the loss of the right to vote by a person convicted of or sentenced to imprisonment for a felony. Since before the civil war, this practice has been a part of the United States justice system mostly as a means to handle the racial issues with voting but then also in regards to the felons and rebels that participated in the Southern “rebellion” during the Civil War. This practice has recently gained some popularity since a debate has developed as to whether it is unconstitutional or not. Is voting a right or a privilege?
...he right to vote. I made a ten question survey that asked questions about letting convicted felons have the right to vote in major elections throughout America. Thirteen out of thirty high school students said that convicted felons should have the right to vote because they are American citizens. The other seventeen people I surveyed said that they should not have the right to vote because they had their chance to perform correctly in society and failed miserably. As you can now see, I have given you many reasons to see that convicted felons should not have the right to vote. They cannot be trusted with such a responsibility as voting for this country’s next leader.
In most states ex-felons are not allowed to vote. This takes away a large portion of the voting population because of how many ex-felons there are right now and the many more that will be in the future. Ex-felons may also have a very hard time finding a job or a place to live. Legally landlords are allowed to deny an ex-felon. In Carbondale Illinois rental properties owners “Home Rentals” does background checks to make sure that none of their potential renters are felons. If they are felons Home Rentals claims that they will deny them the privilege of living in one of their properties. Ex-felons may also have a hard time finding jobs. Not many employers are willing to employ ex-felons for the fear of more crime or less commitment. Though denying these ex-felons jobs will not help the economy, only giving them jobs can help that.
Murderers, rapists, and those convicted with aggravated assault, have obviously not made wise decisions in their lives, yet they are allowed to vote. According to www.felonvoting.procon.org, currently, in Michigan, individuals who have been convicted of a felon are allowed to vote after their term of incarceration. Some think that those who have a felony from a violent crime should not be able to vote, regardless if they have completed their sentence or not. However, other people think that even though an individual with a violent felony may vote after their incarceration period; although, in some states, the felon may have to wait a certain amount of years before they are able to vote. I think that people with violent felonies such as murder, rape, aggravated assault, or battery should not be able to vote whatsoever.
In the New York Times editorial “Florida’s 1.5 Million Missing Voters,” written by The Editorial Board, the topic of felon disenfranchisement is brought up and has been a major issue in the first few days of the new year. Majority believe Felon Disenfranchisement is “...a destructive, pointless policy...” that hurts not only the people not allowed to vote, but the American democracy itself. Another topic in this discussion is the restoration of rights for those who have served their time. Correspondingly, many elected representatives are fighting to have this policy revoked and to give the right to vote back to many people. However, other representatives such as governor Rick Scott, made some biased decisions. For example, a man who was charged with manslaughter due to drunk driving was pleading with Scott about gaining back his rights, but the governor didn’t give him the time of day because that was how his uncle died. Many have explicitly stated that this policy is absurd. The right to vote should be given to everyone and only be withheld under extreme circumstances. The restoration of rights shouldn’t depend on the whims of the governor. In like manner, the governor is no friend to voting rights, and lawmakers have limited power when it comes to constitutional amendments. For this reason, Florida’s voters need to step up and help restore the most fundamental constitutional right to more than a million of their fellow citizens.
To be blunt if we keep denying released felons the right to vote we will keep losing touch with the fundamentals of our democracy. Our poll numbers will keep going down and people who want to vote won’t be able to. We will be denying them a helpful tool for reintegration or rehabilitation even if it doesn’t it might show us when someone is ready to become apart of society and stop reckless behavior. Also, just like in the case of Leola Strickland let people who just made a small mistake and still want to vote another
... who are eligible of voting should get out there and vote. We fought to expand suffrage, and now we must show the government we are capable of voting.
the right to vote is a natural right that comes with citizenship. To deny a certain group
The United States is one of the only few democratic countries that disenfranchises convicted felons. An estimated 5.85 million people charged with a felony are banned from voting. Moreover, felon disenfranchisement laws are a form of racial discrimination because a large percentage of felons are Hispanic, Latino or African American that have been incarcerated as a result of racial profiling. Denying felons from voting is unconstitutional since the right to vote and cast a ballot is supposed to be the cornerstone of democracy. Felons who have completed their sentence should be restored their right to vote as they should be able to participate in elections just like every other citizen. Despite being charged with a felony, felons are also American
The first inception of individual rights began with the founding fathers of the United States, who had a vision in which all citizens would have the right to live in this country without being discriminated based on race, gender, religion, or sexual preference (US Constitution, 2010). These are basic human rights for which many people lost their lives to protect as this country was formed. Nonetheless, today one lives in a society in which one must fight to continue to posses those rights once again. Similar to the rest of history, when there have many examples of individual rights were not protected.