Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Genre analysis
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Genre analysis
MES 140 Scene analysis from The Teddy’ Bears The short film ‘Teddy’ Bears set in 1907, has features where you can clearly see Edwin S. Porter mixed solid techniques with different materials. It has an admirable sequence of stop-motion scenes that is as enjoyable to watch as it is impressive in its technique. The film can be considered part fairy tale, as well as part violent political satire and a puppet animation. In the beginning, the plot adapts the famous and very popular fairy tale of Goldilocks and the Three Bears. It contains some sequences that were considered as political criticism also known as propaganda. For example, it was thought that there was a relationship between the film and the President at the time Theodore “Teddy” Roosevelt. One element in this mixture of fairy tale and …show more content…
It was not so rich in shots since scenes were long and in most cases in the same environment. The camera movement is static; it doesn’t go anywhere but shows different sets as the outside of the bear house, the inside and the road where the chase began. Being said that the camera didn’t move, movements such as pan, tilt, crane or tracking were absent in this short film. This film’s point of interest is the mixture of genres and types of narratives that are included in such a short film. This is not really common today since films have become more complex and follow different alignments and respecting genres and rules. Probably all the events that look different from this short film might be due to the technological limitations of that era. The short film did not have a lot of space for storytelling or narrating the story, therefore, it was a good idea to rely on the audience to understand its narrative. Many people see this movie as an adaptation of a fairy tale, but politic adepts try to find the connection with Roosevelt’s imperialism. This creates a debate about the main point of the
The importance that this period in time and how it influenced us now. For some would say that this film is the ugly truth and that it shouldn’t be shown. But personally, this film has opened my eyes to the struggle and fear that our people have to accept change. Racism was and somewhat still is one of the issues that most try to keep under wraps. This film relieves the ugly truth in Griffith’s perspective and should be explained and understood. “This is an historical presentation of the civil war and reconstruction period and is not meant to reflect on any race of people of today” (second half, Birth of a Nation) Griffith’s perspective on the occasions of the plot is ironic, comprehensive, and is intense enough to offer the material for its own inconsistency.
Best, Gary Dean. " Pride Prejudice and Politics: Roosevelt Versus Recovery" Sides Clashing Views on Controversial Issues in American History. eds. -. Larry Madaras et al. Guilford, CT: Dushkin/ McGraw-Hill, 1997.
[1] Within the last few decades, we have generated a great number of “historical” films reaching the American public. With these “historical” films come the question of whether or not the film portrayed history in an accurate manner; if not, why were the facts manipulated the way that they were. Unfortunately, this question is usually answered in the negative, and the audience is left with a fictional account of a factual happening, thereby giving the viewing public mixed messages concerning the issues raised within the film. Film used in this manner can be a dangerous tool in the hands of powerful people with agendas and ulterior motives.
consider to be more modern film techniques. Montage plays a key role in this film, as
The short story and the film have the same plots and the same conflict ...
This article analyzes Roosevelt’s world-views and personal beliefs. Engel gives insight into Roosevelt’s philosophy for the roles played in the international arena, especially the role played by the United States. This look into Roosevelt’s philosophies will help explain his reasons for taking a stance against corruption in big business and the government.
Shot 2: Close up. Dorothy views Oz and looks around, hugs Toto, walks out of shot. Angle straight on; no camera movement. Sound is still melodious, light nature sounds ambient.
Lions and tigers and politics oh my? The Wonderful Wizard of OZ written by L. Frank Baum has become an American classic since 1900 with its simple good hearted storyline, but enough parallels have been found within the written text linking it to politics that suggests otherwise. Baum claims to have written the story solely for the pleasure of children and that he could never have imagined the impact it would have on the public. When the text was adapted to film nearly 40 years later, it became an instant block buster and captured the hearts of the movie going public. It remains an American favorite today thanks to its charismatic actors, dazzling colors, and unforgettable music. But The Wizard of Oz is not the simple tale it alludes to, under its façade of charm lies hidden themes and motifs filled with political symbolism referring to the Populist Party.
Suspense is a 1913 film that portrays the story of a tramp intruding into a family’s home, where a mother takes care of her child while her husband is away. The plot is a common one that had been used previous times before the film’s release, such as in The Lonely Villa (1909). However, through taking advantage of the single frame shot, the filmmakers were able to create a masterful aesthetic of two separate stories that turn a basic plot into a complex story. The film created an inventive way of illustrating stories within cinema by allowing the audience the chance to consume more narrative in less time within just one take.
The American film industry’s early attempts at the narrative Western were limited and in the early years were produced mainly in the east. During this early time in the film industry the...
When considering the presidents of the United States, Theodore Roosevelt is almost always associated with ideas of imperialism, progressivism, and masculinity. Bederman uses Roosevelt as the perfect example of manhood and exposes his form of racially dominant manhood. She writes, “for Roosevelt, race and gender, were inextricably intertwined with each other” (214). Evidence of this can be found in her discussion of Roosevelt’s African
There are many accurate depictions of the political process in this movie, but there are also some areas where this movie was just being a people pleaser. The American President accurately portrayed the rolls of the media, the effects of polling, the impact of primaries, and it showed the process of introducing a bill to congress. However, it also was being a typical Hollywood movie at times. This was mostly true in the cases where the President came off being naïve, when he through caution into the wind for a girlfriend, and at other times, like when he was to dignified to join into the smear campaign.
Roosevelt’s word choice is especially powerful as is seen in his use of the unusual word “infamy.” He also uses repetition and the way he orders his points to achieve
An obvious difference in these films is that the 1931 version played to a Depression audience and that the Coppola version played to a modern audience. (I am being extremely careful because, obviously, the 1931 audience was modern in 1931; however, we like to think of ourselves as being more modern than past generations. There are differences in the audiences which viewed the respective versions in their time, and I hope to prove this point as the paper unfolds.)
Arrival of a Train at La Ciota,the first projected and enlarged 35mm film short, inadvertently