Robert Morgan Analysis

528 Words2 Pages

Yes, In the passages, Robert Morgan makes the claim that was supported the land because the land is the most popular thing that Morgan talked about in the passage.the passage states that Morgan wanted to expand the western expand The passage also stated that people wanna to cross the land without fighting. Therefore, people were trying to fight back there land to get back to the land.My people some of them have run away to the hills and have no blankets and no food. On the other hand, one could argue that Robert Morgan wasn't right on his claims because people were talking about more of the land than to talk about the western expansion. The other part of the claims was people couldn't have cross the border without their permission, or it was war time. Although the people did not want to have war they just wanted their land. I have heard talk and talk but nothing is done. Good words do not last long unless they amount to something. The early 17’s to early 18’s, the Rainy Mountain and America was the most part of land that was in the western expansion.Their country was large. We were contented to let things remain as the Great Spirit Chief made them. They had the most. The people in both of the stories are Kiowa Indians and Lewis, Clark. Lewis and Clark was going to the mandan mountains, which was the land to get to the western …show more content…

The indians are trying to past thought to have or create and new nation that would expand the land even more.The land was a big part of the issue because the indians had less land, the white men people was trying to take over their land and explore more with it. Although, the land was a big part of the issue because the indians had less land, the white men people was trying to take over their land and explore more with

Open Document