Rhetorical Analysis Of Winning The Lottery

1125 Words3 Pages

Win the lottery and be miserable for the rest of your life. Studies on how having money affects ones contentment shows that more money does not necessarily equate to higher level of happiness. Looking at the article “Does Money Equal happiness” the author, Davidson, states that “once basic needs are met” additional money does not translate into more happiness, ‘they actually are less happy”. Reviewing the article “Winning the lottery: Does it guarantee happiness” the author, Landau, states ‘life satisfaction rises with higher income up to a household income of about $75,000 per year, and levels off afterward”. In addition, Landau states “when you become rich it changes your relationship with friends and family”, people feel they are a part of the new wealth. In John Steinbeck’s book The Pearl we see conformation of this when Kino the protagonist …show more content…

Landau points out that this is because the bulk of our happiness in invested in getting our basic needs met. Basics needs are items such as food, water, clothing, and shelter. Having money to spend on items other than the basic needs does not seem to increase the level of happiness, however, spending the excess money on having more life experiences does seem to add to the level of happiness. Human nature is to always want more. It seems to be the push to get more that motivates us to work so hard. People are always looking to move to the next level. Competition is what drives us forward. The cycle is never ending, get some want some, get some more, want some more. On the other hand, not everyone is greedy or intensely competitive. The sudden change in wealth may just push an existing system out of homeostasis and it is the readjusting period that causes all the problems. The state homeostasis includes friends, family, and

Open Document