Rhetorical Analysis Of Letter From Birmingham Jail

1388 Words3 Pages

King concludes with optimism about the future of the relationship between the currently segregated blacks and whites. He hopes that “[o]ne day the South will know that [the Negroes] were in reality standing up for the best in the American dream” (47), and that “the evil system of segregation” (46) will come to an end. He wants the South to realize the struggles that the Negroes have gone through to gain their freedom, and consider them as heroes who fought for their rights. King believes that eventually there will be freedom for all Americans, regardless of their race or socioeconomic status. He ends by softening his tone and closes with “[y]ours in the cause of [p]eace and [b]rotherhood” (49). This closing statement reiterates King’s central …show more content…

A periodic sentence is much stronger than its opposite, a loose sentence. In this example, Emerson employs a periodic sentence to emphasize that one must trust themselves. 14. “The high school student was drowning in a sea of homework from all of his AP and honors classes.” The purpose of metaphor is to make writing more thought provoking and meaningful, as well as to provide emphasis on a subject. Metaphor also creates vivid imagery in the reader’s mind, as can be seen with the metaphor I have created. Upon reading it, the reader literally imagines a student drowning under a sea of papers and work, unable to break free and reach the surface. 15. “That’s one small step for man, one giant leap for mankind.” - Neil Armstrong The purpose of antithesis is to express an idea more emphatically, and create contrast between the two elements juxtaposed in the sentence. This illustrates the stark difference between the two elements, and emphasizes the ideas contained within the antithesis. In the famous quote from Neil Armstrong, Armstrong compares the small step he took with the giant leap that mankind just took by making contact with another celestial body for the first time in history. By comparing it with a small step, Armstrong further emphasizes the significance of this …show more content…

The most important literary text to have in order to understand the ideas King presents is the original statement of concern and caution issued by the eight white clergymen. Martin Luther King’s letter is a response to that statement, and it is imperative to have access to it in order to understand which points King is countering and why he is doing so. Without this text, a reader would not know who is being referenced when King references “men of genuine good will” (1). In addition, context regarding the Bible would also be beneficial, since King alludes to it repeatedly throughout his letter. King justifies civil disobedience by comparing it to the “refusal of Shardach, Meshach, and Abednego” (21), which was described in the Book of Daniel. A key historical context that would be valuable to the reader is World War II. King employs the policies of Nazi Germany and Hitler to further persuade his reader that unjust laws should not be followed. Without knowledge that Hitler was a vicious dictator who ruthlessly segregated against Jews, a reader would not be able to fully understand the sarcasm that King expresses when he states that “everything Hitler did in Germany was ‘legal’” (22). It would also be very beneficial if the reader had context on the ideas of Jon Bunyan, Abraham Lincoln, Thomas Jefferson, and others who King references in his letter in order to better understand his

Open Document