Martin Luther King Jr.'s Impasse Speech Analysis

1052 Words3 Pages

Martin Luther King Jr.’s Impasse in Race Relations is a speech that confronts the audience of the past, present, and future aspects of race relations. The speech addressed by King refers to an impasse as a situation in which there is no escapes or progresses. In the speech, King reveals the different feelings and reasoning’s as to what Negroes have experienced and dealt with. He also shares and interprets various violent and non-violent approaches to racial problems. In this essay, I will present my thoughts and opinions based on King’s ideas introduced in his speech. King introduces two phases of the Negroes struggle: “the first began in the 1950’s when Negroes slammed the door shut on submission and subservice,” and “when Negroes assertively …show more content…

To me, this argument is logical and valid. King acknowledges this by describing policy makers crafting the living conditions of the Negroes. King states, “The slums are the handiwork of a vicious system of the white society; Negroes live in them, but they do not make them, any more than a prisoner makes a prison,” (King, 8). King refers to the slums as the housing projects of the Negroes and states the policy makers flagrantly violate building codes and regulations. This would show the white man not enforcing the laws and breaking laws intentionally when dealing with Negroes. As Negroes stood up for what they believed to be true, the white man became increasingly defiant. To me, it seems as if the white men were afraid to allow Negroes rights that they themselves possessed and perhaps even took for granted. My inference here is that white men were not prepared and were frightened to allow a class of people that they found less than human be present and existent in their everyday society. I believe fear was one of the major adversaries on both sides. The white man was afraid of change and this fear birthed hate and discrimination to a race that they were unsure of. They were more involved in their own self-interests than in a whole race of people. The only thing that they thought was right was to keep Negroes and whites separated through segregation, which fumed the emotions of the Negroes and ultimately established their conclusions to violence and riots. The white man perpetuated policy making that effected the Negroes in a negative way which I believe caused harm to race

Open Document