Rhetorical Analysis Of Dr. Martin Luther King's March On Washington

656 Words2 Pages

Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. was one of our greatest leaders. MLK had lived in a harsh segregated time while living as a pacifist. In his lifetime he has accomplished many achievements like protesting rights that African Americans didn’t have and also started marches and bus boycotts. One of his most famous marches was called the “March on Washington.” The “March on Washington” was a huge march for Dr. King, many people of different races had participated. Shortly after the march everyone gathered at the Memorial to hear MLK’s speech about how African Americans have suffered for natural rights. The speech was broadcasted worldwide and has inspired many people. In MLK’s speech he used many different literary elements to persuade and get the the people see where his is coming from. In order for people to understand the meaning of MLK’s speech, we have to know why and how he used allusion and anaphora to persuade his audience. …show more content…

When he uses allusions he is comparing the present to the past or just a casual reference from the past. When he uses anaphora he is repeating a word or phrase at the beginning or sentences or paragraphs, and is used mostly to make a point. Allusions in his speech gives a greater meaning to his purpose and emphasizes the overall point of what he is trying to persuade by connecting to the past. When he is using anaphora he is restating a phrase or a word to highlight his main reason of the speech. As Martin Luther King Jr. points out in paragraph 4 using allusions, “unalienable rights of life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness.” With that, Dr. King is trying to show that every man should have equal rights because it is stated in the

Open Document