The Rhetorical Analysis Of Martin Luther King, Jr.

722 Words2 Pages

Martin Luther King, Jr., born on January 15, 1929, was well known for his nonviolent movement to bring justice and to an end to the segregation of the people in the United States back in the 1950s. With King being the leader of a peaceful protest, it failed to bring equally to the colored people. Martin Luther King, Jr. was labeled as an “outsider” who was “hatred and violence” and that his actions were “unwise and untimely” from the Public Statement by Eight Alabama Clergymen (clergymen). In response, on the day of April 16, 1963, he wrote the Letter from Birmingham Jail to declare and defense his movement was not “unwise and untimely” at all. To analyze his points, King used the powerful literary devices of pathos- use of an emotional appeal.ethos- …show more content…

This is an imagery for the life of Negro people and that blacks were living a life no better than a jail because they were labeled as “colored”. He also stated, “It is unfortunate that demonstrations are taking place in Birmingham, but it is even more unfortunate that the city’s white power structure left the Negro community with no alternative” (King). The white had taken over the power of the country, left the blacks with no choice but to …show more content…

King had gained respect from some audience because of his soft tone. He established his ethos to readers, especially to the white, by saying, “I have the honor of serving as president of the Southern Christian Leadership Conference, an organization operating in every southern state” (King, Martin Luther, Jr.). To connect his idea to the real world, he used the image of Apostle Paul left the village to carry the gospel of Jesus Christ as it’s his duty to carry the gospel of freedom beyond his hometown. He explained in his text that anyone who lives inside the United States can never be considered as the outsider (King). By saying this, he created logic that there was a connection between people to people. He also explained that the reason he was there because injustice in Birmingham was calling for him. In the letter, he wrote, “Injustice anywhere is a threat to justice everywhere… Whatever affects one directly, affects all indirectly. Never again can we afford to live with the narrow, provincial ‘outside agitator’ idea”

Open Document