Reflection On The Practicum Event

819 Words2 Pages

In this first section of the paper I will describe my experience from the practicum event, Building a Better Aggieland. I will discuss my initial feelings and thoughts upon arrival to the practicum event, then go on to a description of the participants who attended the event and then explain the techniques I used as a lead facilitator during the group facilitation. When I had arrived I was nervous, I felt this way since I knew that Hannah and I were one of the eight partners chosen to facilitate at the event. Although I was nervous I felt some confidence knowing I was prepared by having facilitated twice before and acquiring many facilitation skills throughout the course. With arrival to the meeting room in the MSC I noted that it was a familiar …show more content…

Therefore at the event the people I saw who attended were all undergraduate students, many had said they came for the free dinner or that they had a friend in the COMM 447 course. These participants did not initially seem to have a strong tie the problem, which could affect the conversations generated. By all being students at Texas A&M was main contributor the climate that was manifested during the event. Once we started the event people had become comfortable with eachother and there had been a sense of comradery between participants. The climate among the attendee seemed to be comfortable this could have been created by being peers since they were all students as well as sharing a meal with eachother. Throughout the event the climate was comfortable and the participants seemed to project a feeling of community with …show more content…

I had used many different techniques, some I had used were asking questions to elaborate, paraphrasing, summarizing and mirroring. When a participant in my facilitation said something a bit absurd I had mirrored what he said so he could hear in his own words. This was a way to have him fully grasp what he had said and would hopefully elaborate on what he meant. Additionally when someone would say a vague sentence, I would ask them to elaborate so that it could elicit for a deeper conversation and understanding. During a participants reasoning, there was capacity to understand why they had said what they said. I would also paraphrase what was said by the participants to help Hannah on what to write and to build concreate ideas from what had been said. Consequently through summarizing and reviewing what was discussed after each topic, to again build a coherent summary for the participants. In all I believe my presence did have an influence the conversation discussed in by Spada and Vreeland had used “a novel experimental design in a real deliberative decision-making process, [they found] that moderators can significantly influence the attitudes and behaviors of participants by expressing views in a constrained manner” (2013, p.1). In their experimental design it was discovered that the facilitator has an influence even if “neutral” (Spada & Vreeland, 2013). As the facilitator my presence had to

Open Document