Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Industrialism and the Victorian era
Society changes in the Victorian period
Victorian age social redorms
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Groping Through the Factory: Parallels of Sexual and Industrial Oppression Though producing iron ore may not immediately evoke thoughts of sexual exploitation, the two may be tied more closely when considered in tandem. In Rebecca Harding Davis’ Life in the Iron Mills, nuanced language laced with sexual connotations foregrounds the exploitive nature of capitalism. Life in the Iron Mills tells the tale of two Welsh immigrants, Hugh and Deborah Wolfe, and in the process presents subtle suggestions regarding the oppressive and one-sided benefits of 19th century factory work. In considering this language of reluctant sexuality and its relationship to capitalism in the text, it is imperative to tease out the tennents of capitalism that create …show more content…
In the scene in which Deborah bring Hugh a pail of supper at the mill, Hugh invites her to stay with him there for the remainder of his shift, a request with which she obliged. He tells her, “Ye’re tired, poor lass! Bide here till I go. Lay down there on that heap of ash, and go to sleep” (Davis 9). This heap of ash Hugh is directing his cousin to lay on is a by-product of the iron making process. Deborah’s position on the unwanted remnants of the Capitalist’s spoils juxtaposes the laborer and the capitalist process in one setting. The narrator continues, “He threw her an old coat for a pillow, and turned to his work. The heap was the refuse of the burnt iron, and was not a hard bed; the half smothered warmth, too, penetrated her limbs, dulling her pain and cold shiver.” Again, the verb “penetrated” conjures up sexual imagery, though this sentence does more than just that. The ash, a proxy for capitalism, is simultaneously causing her pain and soothing it away. The warmth of the makeshift bed warms Deborah, though the reason she is cold is because she is in the factory. Without the factory, she would have neither the shivering, nor the remedy for her chills. This paradox is emblematic of the issue at the heart of the text. Industrial capitalism provides a living for those at the bottom of …show more content…
Following Deborah’s journey to the mill, the narrator rhetorically asks “Deeper yet if one could look, was there nothing worth reading in this wet, faded thing, half-covered with ashes? no story of a soul filled with groping passionate love, heroic unselfishness, fierce jealousy?” (Davis 9). The curious intertwining of industrial capitalism and sexuality continues into this line, as the ashes again represent the waste and unused scraps of the factory process, and the “groping” suggests a degree of unwillingness or discomfort from our proxy for the labor force--Deborah. The ashes covering her are smothering her in the oppression of industrial capitalism, and barring her from leading a truly “passionate”
The author puts into light some of the daily horrors of these people. Some of these passages are horrific. The work conditions were anything but clean and safe. The poem touches on how the people were around chemicals, inhaling poison. He goes on about the dangers of going to the canning factories with no safety or labor restrictions. Even though work conditions were
The literature of the nineteenth century cataloged the social, economical and political changes during its period. Through it many new concerns and ideologies were proposed and made their journeys through intellectual spheres that have endured and kept their relevance in our own period today. The literature, sometimes quite overtly, introduced the issues arising with the changes in society specifically due to the industrial revolution. In this mixture of new ideas was the question of women's labor and functions among this rapidly changing society. American authors as well as Victorian authors, like George Gissing and Mabel Wotton, explored these issues somewhat explicitly during this period. In America, Louisa May Alcott and Charlotte Perkins Gilman expressed these issues in short stories with strong implications of the dangers of unfulfilled or unsatisfying labor available to women.
He described how women were forced to work in shops and factories instead of focusing on how the United States helped people to earn more money. He tells the history of the industrial revolution in a dark but true way. An example of that is the way he tells how angry the Irish immigrants were because of the racism in 1849. “The anger of the city poor often expressed itself in futile violence over nationality or religion. The crowd, shouting ‘Burn the damn den of aristocracy,’ charged, throwing bricks” (227).
Rylant juxtaposes Ginny’s poor family, living on a salary that can only be secured within the harsh, unrelenting working conditions of an industrial mill, against John’s family who is oblivious to the fear of poverty or hunger. In this juxtaposition, contemporary issues of economic privilege and workers rights influence the budding war-time romance of John and Ginny, and to us, the audience, peering in at them. By gradually magnifying John’s discomfort in entering Ginny’s “tattered neighborhood,” Rylant reveals the historical extraordinariness of wealth amidst squalor in the city of Pittsburgh. “Mills were fed coal and men so Pittsburgh might live,” and Ginny’s father gives his life to the mill so his family might live, albeit in the walls of this tiny rented apartment (Rylant 2). Both historically realistic and entirely fictitious, Rylant’s characters break the “single perspective” of history texts, fleshing out facts with their own stories, and marking our modern time with their experiences (Jacobs and Tunnell 117).
They carry bundles of garments from the factories to the tenements, little beasts of burden, robbed of the school life that they may work for us.” By going into detail about what kinds of work the children do at work helps to open up the audience’s eyes to a perspective that is more personal and in-depth than Kelley merely lecturing them. In doing this, Kelley is able to invoke a sense of guilt that the audience members share. Consequently, the audience members thus feel the need to make change and rid themselves of the guilt they feel by allowing the continuation of children’s forced labor. By using such complex rhetorical strategies, Kelley toys with the audience’s emotions as well as motivates them to provide support for the reform of child labor laws.
The owners of the factories in New England, like in Lowell, Massachusetts, oppressed young girls by being careless with their safety. It was already terrible that women made one-eighth of what men made; their affordability for employers made girls, especially immigrants, desirable to save money. That could be the cause of the employer’s lack of regard for their safety. In the factories, from sunrise to sunset, women, men, and children had to breathe in unhealthy and unventilated air. In addition, men and women were being injured and killed because of hazardous surroundings, as Mary S. Paul writes to her father, “My life and health are spared while others are cut off.” Workers have been breaking their necks and ribs and being killed by cars (Doc F). It is an employer’s responsibility to keep his/her employees safe because, in reality, it would be in their interest to keep their workers alive to make them money. Still the girl’s well-being and interests were ignored because it would trouble the factory owners. As a result of the owner’s profiteering, employees were dying.
This essay will compare Marx’s understanding of the relationship between laborers and capitalists and Wollstonecraft’s understanding of the relationship between women and men. Both Marx and Wollstonecraft’s conception of these groups of people show a large gap between their treatment and status in society. Marx argues that capitalism is not created by nature and the unequal relationship between laborers and capitalists is not humane. In other words, it is actually the cause of social and economic problems during that time period. On a similar note, Wollstonecraft believes that the oppressive relationship between men and women is also unnatural. The standards for men and women are placed by society, not by biological facts. Society and how people
Thomas, Deborah. ""Don't let the bastards grind you down": Echoes of hard times in the Handmaid's Tale." Dickens Quarterly. (2008): 90-96. Print.
You wake up, it is dark. You rush to get to the hot, muggy factory, knowing you will be there for the next fourteen hours. By the time you get your first break you are worn out for the day. You finally make it through the day, it is dark already. You go home, catch a few hours of sleep and do the same thing over again. If reading that made you miserable, you would not survive as a silk factory worker. Most girls were sold, by their parents, to the silk factories to help with the financial situation. These jobs required long, hard workdays for little pay and break time. Even though the conditions were so harsh people wonder, did the cost outweigh the benefits?Although it might seem like it wasn’t that bad, working
The girls that worked in the textile mills enjoyed new freedoms but also faced many challenges. Per Feller, the mill girls found “a blend of independence, conviviality, respectability, and reward” (120). These new experiences for the young women of New England came with many rules and harsh conditions but provided them with a sense of purpose and unique liberties.
“He had already lost the strength and instinct vigor of a man, his muscles were thin, his nerves weak, his face (a meek, woman’s face) haggard, yellow with consumption” (Davis 11). This is just one description of the main character, Hugh Wolfe in the story “Life in the Iron Mills” by Rebecca Harding Davis that alludes to his femininity which was a characteristic that made him unfit to perform the roles that were expected of men during the time period in which this story was written. Throughout the short story, Davis illustrates several social issues related to inequality, which left many contemporary readers shocked and critical. The intertwined gender roles and contentious portrait of the division of the working class and upper class are a
Imagine being forced to work in conditions that might cause you to lose a limb, to be beaten daily, or to be left with long term respiratory conditions. These terrible conditions were realities to families who worked in textile factories in the 1700’s. England was the first to adopt textile factories which would benefit with mass production of cotton material. According to the power point, “Industrial Revolution; Life in English Factories”, low and unskilled workers, often children, ran the machines and moved material, this helped lower the cost of goods. During this time, commissions investigated the working conditions of the factories.
The nineteenth century saw rapid development and reform across the whole of the country; with the Industrial Revolution transforming life in Britain. For working class women life was an endless struggle of passivity and labour; as soon as they were old enough they worked on farms, in factories or as servants to the middle classes (Lambert, 2009). For women in general, life was oppressive; constantly overshadowed by the male gender who were considered dominant leaders. In a Victorian household, the male was head of the family; his wife and children respected him and obeyed him without question. This critical analysis of two nineteenth century novels - Hard Times by Charles Dickens and Wuthering Heights by Emily Brontë, will discuss the representation of the two female protagonists in the context of the Victorian period and question whether they do indeed portray an endless struggle for survival and independence.
The industrial revolution had begun a social revolution, and with ideas of democracy becoming popular, the notion of equality existed. But in the areas of England that housed the “landed gentry” it was no more than a notion. The gentry and peasantry were still totally separate and even if the gentry espoused the idea of equality, as Tess was accepted into the richer side of the family, the acceptance was hypocritical.
The Victorian Period (1833-1901) brought about the expansion of Britain’s booming economy. In Britain, around the beginning of the Victorian Period, the consequence of industrialism brought much unrest across the land. The factories were notorious for their horrible working conditions, and the common workers’ housing was atrocious. Victorians struggle with religious, philosophical, and social ramifications (854-856). The complex background to what was happening in Britain at the time led to a new and interesting literature period.