Psychology of leadership

1561 Words4 Pages

What is it that drives the human spirit to accomplish such unbelievable feats? It can be said that each individual strives for a better life for themselves. Is that the case of is there a more external force of motivation for us? Do you believe that we can live our own lives in a way in which we maximize our life’s potential? There are, of course, many different types of personalities that exist. Certainly you don’t listen to exactly the same music or enjoy the same films that your coworkers do. So it goes that with each personality comes a different way of reacting to situations. Perhaps you’ve heard of the common “fight or flight response” stated first by Walter Bradford Cannon. While we can enter into a deep discussion on this response, the purpose of these pages is not to highlight what it is that causes people to react in a certain way but what cause people to spark reactions in others.
Our world has been shaped by people of varying personalities. Yet there are always ones who take the lead and work above the average person. That is not to say they view themselves as higher than others. This is simply to saying that people who take the lead carry responsibilities of helping others and overseeing the progress of groups as a whole. Yes, leaders carry weights that other people don’t usually have to carry. Is added responsibilities of leadership something to admire or something to fear? What is it that makes someone a suitable leader? While one of these questions may be a matter of perspective, the other may be answers through varying theories in the field of phycology today.
While nature versus nurture is still an ongoing argument today, in terms of leadership it is widely believed that nurture is what plays the primary role...

... middle of paper ...

...the result of groups like the Nazi’s. Kendra Cherry later examined the positive results such style of leadership brings by quoting Ronald E. Riggio, whom we quoted earlier. He stated in the same article that was quoted earlier, Cutting-Edge Leadership that “Research evidence clearly shows that groups led by transformational leaders have higher levels of performance and satisfaction than groups led by other types of leaders.” The article continues to examine the key reason this is so stating “they inspire, empower, and stimulate followers to exceed normal levels of performance. AND […] focus on and care about followers and their personal needs and development.” This form is by far the most positive way to lead a group. No doubt you can think of some example of leaders that fit this description. As was just stated, the results are truly worth the effort put forward.

Open Document