Lila is a second grade student who participated in a Primary Spelling Inventory and the reflection of her results are as follows. After her spelling inventory was finalized I noted that the student spelled ten of the twenty-six words correctly giving her a power score of 10/26. Most of the words that she mastered was in the Late emergent and early of Letter Name Alphabetic stage. I also noted that Lila accomplished 36 features out of 56 total features during her spelling inventory. Based on the results of the Primary Spelling Inventory the orthographic features that Lila recognizes are the consonants, short vowel, blends, and is familiar with diagraphs. Although she mastered blends which falls in the late Letter Name-Alphabetic stage she failed to master diagraphs which is the middle stage. …show more content…
This is why I would focus on a word study instruction that incorporated diagraphs for this particular student. This assessment process using a spelling inventory was new to me, and I did not fully understand the process in the beginning. I was a little confused with the students familiarized of the th and sh sounds in some words, but not in others. This caused me to second guess the stage I was going to place her in until I received clarification on the various ways that students may spell words correctly from
Two subtests comprise the Sound-Symbol Composite: Phonological Processing and Nonsense Word Decoding. Catalina’s overall performance fell within the Average range (Sound-Symbol Composite Standard Score of 97; 42nd percentile). Catalina performed within the average range when asked to respond orally to items that require manipulation of the sounds within words (Phonological Processing). Additionally, she was asked to read aloud nonsense terms (Nonsense Word Decoding). She performed in the average range in comparison to her same-age peers.
While the reading assessment will be different for all students I learned that I must be attentive to the student and what they say, also I learned that even if the student gets frustrated I should not aid in the reading that is in front of them. Instruction for the students should be clear and precise; I believe that every student should have their own Vocabulary Dictionaries in the classroom. I believe that this will aid the students so much in the way that they will be able to acquire harder words and each students will be different, they will be able to have fun with it as well as learn at the same
The use of abbreviations shortens length of many words thus really help healthcare professionals in saving time spent in writing notes. Abbreviations however do not always provide positive contributions due to misconceptions, misunderstandings, and misinterpretations leading to commitment of errors in the practice. Similarities in abbreviations for instance could root to a grave mistake. For instance the q.d. which an inscriber would like to indicate as every day could be erroneously interpreted as q.i.d. which means four times a day. Such error could result to over dosage when a certain medication is taken four times in a day instead of just once. Though some abbreviations can be easily understood clearly and exactly as to what meaning they communicate, the use of abbreviations generally invite error potentials particularly the error-prone abbreviations (ISMP, 2007) which can be best avoided by eliminating abbreviations.
These DIBELS screening assessments were developed to help educators identify struggling, at-risk readers, so that appropriate types and levels of support can be implemented within the school system. They were designed to support efforts at the primary grade levels (K-6th) to prevent reading struggles as the learn progress through the school system. Furthermore, this test was to aid in the elimination in remediation lessons inside of the classroom.
The Words Their Way inventory assessment provides a series of spelling lists at different levels. It begins with a primary spelling inventory assessment followed by an elementary spelling list and ends with an upper-level spelling inventory. I commenced the test with the primary spelling list since the list is designed to recognize the difficulties with letter naming and word patterns. After correcting this part of the assessment, I noticed that sixty percent of my students obtained a score of 84% or more and the the rest scored at various levels of the primary list. The students that scored less than proficient on the primary list are struggling with word patterns and primary inflectional endings.
For starters, I would like to have more information on the student prior to assessing. I would like to know about the student classroom experience with reading. As a future Special Education Teacher, I have a passion for helping students who face more challenges. This student did not demonstrate that he faced reading challenges. In hindsight, I would like to have worked with a student with reading challenges in order to start developing a plan to close the achievement gap. Although, all students have room to grow, so I am glad to have worked with
When Emilie Davis, a newspaper journalism professor at the S.I. Newhouse School of Public Communications at Syracuse University, picks up her nametag at an event, she often stares down at the more common spelling of her name, “Emily.” She is used to people misspelling her name, so she usually leaves it the way it’s written to not make it a big deal.
This research is intended to analyze the transcript of a child’s speech. The target child is a female named Majorie who is 2 years and 3 months old. The transcript is from The Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology. The linguistic aspects that will be examined are the phonological processes of the child including speech errors, syllable shapes, and her phonetic inventory consisting of manner and place of articulation. Included in the analysis will be her stage and development of lexical knowledge and what words she uses.
..., K., Milczarski, E., & Raby, C. (2011). The Assessment of English Language Learners with Learning Disabilities: Issues, Concerns, and Implications. Education, 131(4), 732-739.
The students with this type of disability exhibits hyperactivity, fine and gross motor coordination, low self-concept, and language delays (Friend & Bursuck, 2006). The type of assessment accommodations commonly prescribed for students with a speech or language impairment are allowing to substitute oral exams with written exams, providing a vocabulary list, allowing the use of calculator, private location for testing, modify the length of the test, substitute oral project presentations with written presentations, and allowing extra time for assessments. According to Friend and Bursuck (2006), one critical element in testing students with disabilities is ensuring that the test results reflect their knowledge and skills, not their
Four phases of reading development have been established (Ehri 1994, 1995, 1998, 1999) : pre-alphabetic, partial alphabetic, full alphabetic and consolidated alphabetic. These phases has led to the core understanding of children's reading development, apart from the pre-alphabetic phase phonological awareness skills are seen throughout the phases.
When it comes to assessment, it is imperative that these are quick, oral, and effective. There are two forms of this assessment: formative and summative. The goal of formative assessment is to monitor each student’s progress and making sure they understand the concept. When testing summative, this occurs at the end, meaning evaluating and comparing a child’s progression from a particular benchmark. With these types of evaluations, we, as educators, have the ability to see where each student is at based on their phonological and phonemic awareness. According to the Michigan Literacy Progress Profile website, an effective balanced literacy program incudes, children clapping syllables, read rhyming text aloud, practice shared writing, and much more. Another way to assess this skill is with DIBELS (The Dynamic Indicators of Basic Early Literacy Skills). DIBELS are designed to be short (about a minute) fluency measures used to monitor the development of early literacy and early reading skills. More specifically, DIBELS First Sound Fluency is a standardized, individually administered assessment that provides a measure of phonemic awareness skills for students. FSF measures how well a student can hear and produce the initial sounds in words. Each test includes about 30 words which are read aloud by the instructor. The instructor then scores each response with 2, 1, or 0 points. A correct pronunciation of the initial sound receives 2 points, initial sounds or blends receive 1 point, and an incorrect sound gets no points. The instructor continues to present words for up to one
It brings component parts together in order to make words. The learners, as it is shown by many studies, know the order of pieces and are able to construct words (Arnoff & Fudeman, 2005, Mc-Bride-Chang et al., 2005). Morphological awareness whether used analytically or synthetically has been reported by many studies to account for significant variance in different skills such as reading, writing, vocabulary acquisition and spelling development(e.g., Carlisle, 2000; Champion, 1997; Tyler & Nagy, 1990; Freyd & Baron, 1982; Mahony, 1994; Deacon, Wade-Woolley & Kirby, 2007; Mann, 1986; Leong, 2000; Deacon & Kirby, 2004; Deacon & Bryant, 2006). Among all these researches done, it seems that it is vocabulary learning and reading comprehension which has attracted too much attention to
The interest in the scientific description of sound has led to the invention of the International Phonetic Association (IPA) in 1888. IPA is an association to develop a phonetic alphabet to symbolise the sound of all languages. According to Fromkin, Rodman, Hyams. (2003), the use of Roman alphabet in the English writing system had inspired the IPA to utilise many Roman letters in the invention of phonetic symbols. Unlike ordinary letters that may or may not represent the same sounds in the same or different languages, these alphabetic characters have a consistent value (Fromkin et al., 2003).