Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Cognitive development and language
Challenges in first language acquisition
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Introduction
This research is intended to analyze the transcript of a child’s speech. The target child is a female named Majorie who is 2 years and 3 months old. The transcript is from The Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology. The linguistic aspects that will be examined are the phonological processes of the child including speech errors, syllable shapes, and her phonetic inventory consisting of manner and place of articulation. Included in the analysis will be her stage and development of lexical knowledge and what words she uses.
Phonological Processes
The child seems to conform to the normal development that other children her age demonstrate. According to Carol Stoel-Gammon (1987), 24 month olds should be able to make a /b/ sound in the initial position just as the child does in utterance 6 (p.327). She can also make an /n/ sound in the final position. See utterance 39.
6 here in bed .
39 you change mine okay ?
An error she does make, however, is stopping. She takes what would normally be fricatives and she turns them into stops. For example,
2 da [: the] baby sad and da [: the] baby crying .
69 dza [: the] boy crying .
She shows signs of chain shifts also. In the examples above, she trades the fricative “th” in “the” for a stop like “da”. Other times, the child correctly pronounces “the”.
29 where are the dog ?
62 I close door with the boy .
The child exhibits an error called final consonant deletion. Instead of fully enunciating the whole word to the end, she drops the last consonant. This is seen in utterance 1 and 72.
1 I want a pen an a book
72 a circle a Oma an(d) Opa.
The “d” in both of the bolded words is missing. She has difficulties with the “d” in t...
... middle of paper ...
...es like consonant harmony can change the word to make it incomprehensible.
The CVC syllable shape was the most common for her. That shape is general in many English nouns. The syllables do not get complex and long, but she is still young and learning.
Her phonetic inventory is well developed. She has no troubles creating the age-appropriate speech sounds. The child is just above normal because she can produce more adult-like sounds than her peers. She has control over her articulators and she knows how to manipulate her oral cavity to produce the correct sounds.
The child’s lexical inventory is well developed. She has no troubles with finding words to express her thoughts. Not many words are repeated and that illustrates that she has a vast vocabulary to where she does not have to borrow words. She does not over or under extend the usage of her words.
As most people know speech and language issues would only happen with children just learning to talk and tennagers in middle school to high school. The reasoning behind this is because most people don’t correct their children’s speech when they are first learning due to the fact that the parents or grandparents think it is to cute to correct, which only hurts the children more th...
The child is at stage three linguistic speech in oral development (Fellows & Oakley, 2014). They show evidence of this in both their receptive and expressive language meeting the criteria for this stage (Fellows & Oakley, 2014). They show evidence of their receptive language by their ability in being able to understand opposites (Fellows & Oakley, 2014). While they had some issues with the differences between soft and scratchy they were able to demonstrate the differences between big and little several times during the dialogue. They showed evidence of their expressive language by their use of telegraphic speech, expanding vocabulary and in the ability to take in turns of speaking and listening (Fellows & Oakley, 2014). Telegraphic
"Speech Development." Cleft Palate Foundation. Cleft Palate Foundation, 25 Oct 2007. Web. 10 Mar 2014.
A 48-month questionnaire was utilized based on the child’s calculated age, which included communication, gross motor, fine motor, problem solving, personal-social, and overall performance. She answered simple questions, demonstrated proper use of plurals and tenses, classified objects, and used connecting words like “because” and “and”
The first time Kingston had to speak English in kindergarten was the moment silence infiltrated her world. Simple dialogue such as “hello” or asking for directions was hell for her because people usually couldn’t hear her the first time she asked, and her voice became weaker every time she tried to repeat the question (422). No matter what, speaking English just shattered her self-esteem.
...g the time period of being born and turning five, a lot of language development did not occur, as it was suppose to. With my hearing not being diagnosed, I could not pick up on a lot of sounds a normal hearing toddler could. I had a hard time saying my constants since they are a high frequency tone.
(Ages: Birth to 7:11) is a standardized assessment to assist in identifying children who have a language disorder or delay. It is composed of two subscales: Auditory Comprehension (AC) and Expressive Communication (EC). The Auditory Comprehension is used to evaluate how much language a child understands. The tasks assess comprehension of basic vocabulary, concepts, and grammatical markers. The Expressive Communication is used to determine how well a child communicates with others. Children are asked to name common objects, use concepts that describe objects and express quantity, and use specific prepositions, grammatical markers, and sentence structures. The responses to each subscale questions yield a standard score where 100 is the
Goal: In 6 weeks, with a treatment frequency of 5 hours a week, mrs. K. speaks words with velar sounds (/ng/ /g/ /k/) in a 1-to-1 conversation with an acquaintance in an intelligible way.
The mother reports remembering her daughter babbling, but says she did not say her first word until much later on than her first child. She said that this was a concern for her and that she discussed it with her pediatrician who did not see any cause for alarm at the time. When t...
The participants in the recording consist of two people; the subject of this research, Nayli Qismi Bin Qadrullah, a 2 years 8months old baby & her mother, Nurulizawati Binti Haji Mohd. Tajuddin. Nayli Qismi was born with special case; cleft lip and palate, unilateral cleft (one side only). She has undergone two surgeries already; the cleft lip surgery and the recent one was cleft palate surgery which she had earlier this year. Before she had her surgery, her speech was not clear and sometimes, she chose to point on things rather than talking. However, after she had her second surgery, she attends speech therapy twice a month and her development of language has changed drastically. For example; one of her first word that she pronounced is her name ‘Nayli’, she pronounced it correctly without emitting the first consonant which ‘n’ is a nasal resonance. Thus, with such progress, I am interested to analyze her language development especially on her phonology.
Better Health Channel. (2014, February 17). Childhood apraxia of speech. Retrieved March 6, 2014, from Better Health Channel: http://betterhealth.vic.gov.au/bhcv2/bhcarticles.nsf/pages/Childhood_apraxia_of_speech
When infants are acquiring their first language, adults speak to them differently than they would speak to other adults. This kind of speech is formally named “Infant-Directed speech”, but is also referred to as “baby talk” and “motherese”. Infant-Directed (ID) speech has several properties that distinguish it from Adult-Directed (AD) speech. There is a debate over whether or not ID speech helps infants acquire language or is a hindrance in their language acquisition process Several experiments have been performed to test the effect of ID speech on infants’ language learning. These experiments all used different properties of ID speech. Overall, the experiments have proved that ID speech helps infants acquire language better than AD speech for different reasons. Further studies can be performed on ID speech to learn more about its effects on second language acquisition and on different ages.
Within this utterance from Faye, four types of connected speech processes have been demonstrated. Firstly, Faye demonstrated the connected speech process of deletion in the word “just” by deleting the final consonant /t/. In isolation form, the word “just” would be pronounced as /ʤəst/, with the inclusion of the final consonant /t/. Secondly, in this utterance there was a reduction of vowels to an unstressed form by implementing a /ə/ into the function word “of”. This reduction of a vowel to a schwa in Faye’s utterance is due to a lack of stress on this function word in connected speech. In isolation form, the word “of” would be pronounced as /ɔʄ/. A second instance of reducing vowels to an unstressed form occurs in the utterance “to”, by implementing a schwa in place of a /ʉː/. In isolation, the word “to” would be pronounced as /tʉː/. A third connected speech process that has been demonstrated in Faye’s utterance is segment deletion from the removal of the unstressed syllable from “family” in connected speech, taking this word from three syllables to two syllables. In isolation form, the word “family” would be pronounced as /ʄæməliː/. Lastly, in the word “trying” the final velar nasal consonant was replaced
Over extension is a common error in early speech. This is when a child uses one word to label multiple different things. (Rescolra, 1980). Over extension is most common between the ages of 18 months and 36 months. For example, toddlers may call every male person they meet "dad", or every animal with four legs a dog. Over extension occurs almost exclusively in speech, rarely in comprehension. About one-third of children's words will be over extended at some point. Over extensions are often based on a perceptual similarity. As children's vocabularies and conceptual categories develop, over extension decreases. (Keenen, 2002, pg. 218) Even though the child has made a mistake, it is a sign that the child is advancing in their thought processes. The child is starting to develop mental categories and
able to sound out the words. Not all children can do that. But if they can or could, what happens when your child gets