Sound-Symbol/Decoding Two subtests comprise the Sound-Symbol Composite: Phonological Processing and Nonsense Word Decoding. Catalina’s overall performance fell within the Average range (Sound-Symbol Composite Standard Score of 97; 42nd percentile). Catalina performed within the average range when asked to respond orally to items that require manipulation of the sounds within words (Phonological Processing). Additionally, she was asked to read aloud nonsense terms (Nonsense Word Decoding). She performed in the average range in comparison to her same-age peers. Two subtests comprise the Decoding Composite: Nonsense Word Decoding and Letter and Word Recognition. Her overall performance fell within the Average range (Decoding Composite Standard …show more content…
Catalina’s overall performance fell within the Below Average range (Reading Fluency Composite Standard Score of 88; 21st percentile). First, Catalina was asked to read a list of nonsense words aloud as quickly as possible during two 15 second trials (Decoding Fluency). She performed within the below average range. She also performed within the below average range when she was asked to read a list of words aloud as quickly as possible during two 15 second trials (Word Recognition Fluency). Catalina appears to demonstrate below average word reading and decoding skills. Finally, Catalina was required to silently read simple sentences and mark ‘yes’ or ‘no’ to indicate whether the statement is true or false. For instance, Catalina might read the question ‘Is the ocean orange?’ and then mark ‘no.’ She was asked to complete as many items as possible within a two-minute time limit (Silent Reading Fluency). Catalina performed within the average range. Reading Understanding Two subtests comprise the Reading Composite: Letter and Word Recognition and Reading Comprehension. Catalina’s overall performance fell within the Average range (Reading Composite Standard Score of 95; 37th
On the GORT-5, Jarrod’s average rate was one minute and 71 seconds or 131 seconds. Jarrod reads very slow and is focused too much and pronouncing the words correctly that he is not able to make meaning from the text. Although reading comprehension was his strongest skill area in the GORT-5, research on reading fluency, has shown that when students are able to read fluently, students are able to improve their comprehension. Jarrod will benefit from explicit instruction in reading rate, prosody and building confidence reading aloud.
The Wilson Language program has a precise structure to function as an intervention and is able to assist second through twelfth grade struggling readers to learn the construction of words by directly instructing students to decode and encode confidently. Natalie Hill, a Wilson Language Program assessor, said, ‘“There is a frequent change of pace, students will see as well as hear, multiple opportunities for students to be engaged and participate in activities, extensive controlled text methods and materials to “see” critical word components, like vowels, digraphs, etc., stop “guessing habit”, reading and spelling taught simultaneously, hands on, multisensory methods, no glossy pictures”’ (Hi...
Specific prompts, sample and teaching items individualize the administration and ensure low scores are not due to the subject’s failure to understand the standardized instructions. The KTEA-3 continues to use item blocks, based on educational level, for the Reading Comprehension, Listening Comprehension, Written Expression, and Oral Expression subtests with instructions for establishing a basal. The KTEA-3 utilizes only a suggested order of subtest administration; only two of the subtests (i.e., Letter & Word Recognition before Word Recognition Fluency and Nonsense Word Decoding before Decoding Fluency) have a designated order as a minimum level of performance on the former ensures the examinee has the requisite skills to complete the latter. See Table 1 for a summary of the KTEA-3 test and composite
Lila is a second grade student who participated in a Primary Spelling Inventory and the reflection of her results are as follows. After her spelling inventory was finalized I noted that the student spelled ten of the twenty-six words correctly giving her a power score of 10/26. Most of the words that she mastered was in the Late emergent and early of Letter Name Alphabetic stage. I also noted that Lila accomplished 36 features out of 56 total features during her spelling inventory. Based on the results of the Primary Spelling Inventory the orthographic features that Lila recognizes are the consonants, short vowel, blends, and is familiar with diagraphs. Although she mastered blends which falls in the late Letter Name-Alphabetic stage she failed to master diagraphs which is the middle stage.
Labov, W. "Can Reading Failure Be Reversed? A Linguistic Approach to the Question." [http://www.ling.upenn.edu/phono_atlas/RFR.html]. (4/9/97).
Assessments should guide instruction and material selection. Any likely manner, assessments should measure student progress, as well as help, identify deficiencies in reading (Afflerback, 2012). One important indicator of reading deficiencies is spelling. Morris (2014), advocated the importance of administering a spelling assessment in order to have a better understanding of a student’s reading abilities. My school uses the Words Their Way spelling inventory to assess students’ reading abilities at the beginning of the year and throughout the reading year.
With Shelia being at a 94% accuracy rate this would but this text at an instructional level for Shelia. Most of Shelia’s errors were a variety of meaning, syntax and visual errors. Shelia also self corrected herself several times throughout her reading as she was a slower reader than most. At some points throughout the passage she was also seen phrasing out unfamiliar words at some points throughout. Shelia is able to monitor her own reading at some points, however her main errors were pronouncing, “Carol” as “Carl.” These errors are common for both the meaning and visual aspect of trying to understand
Her phonetic inventory is well developed. She has no troubles creating the age-appropriate speech sounds. The child is just above normal because she can produce more adult-like sounds than her peers. She has control over her articulators and she knows how to manipulate her oral cavity to produce the correct sounds.
The Wilson Reading System (WRS) is the chief program of Wilson Language Training and the foundation of all other Wilson Programs. WRS is an intensive Tier 3 program for students in grades 2-12 and adults with word-level deficits who are not making adequate progress in their current intervention; have been unable to learn with other teaching strategies and require multisensory language instruction; or who require more intensive structured literacy instruction due to a language-based learning disability like dyslexia. As WRS is a structured literacy program founded on phonological-coding research and Orton-Gillingham principles, it directly and systematically teaches the structure of the English
In the partial alphabetic phase individuals pay attention to different letters in a word in order to attempt its pronunciation, usually the first and final letters of a word are focused on, Ehri referred to this as ‘phonetic cue reading’. This is a skill which along with others which shows phonological awareness.
Auditory processing is the process of taking in sound through the ear and having it travel to the language portion of the brain to be interpreted. In simpler terms, “What the brain does with what the ear hears”(Katz and Wilde, 1994). Problems with auditory processing can affect a student’s ability to develop language skills and communicate effectively. “If the sounds of speech are not delivered to the language system accurately and quickly, then surely the language ability would be compromised” (Miller, 2011). There are many skills involved in auditory processing which are required for basic listening and communication processes. These include, sensation, discrimination, localization, auditory attention, auditory figure-ground, auditory discrimination, auditory closure, auditory synthesis, auditory analysis, auditory association, and auditory memory. (Florida Department of Education, 2001) A person can undergo a variety of problems if there is damage in auditory processing . An auditory decoding deficit is when the language dominant hemisphere does not function properly, which affects speech sound encoding. (ACENTA,2003) Some indicators of a person struggling with an auditory decoding deficit would be weakness in semantics, difficulty with reading and spelling, and frequently mishearing information. Another problem associated with auditory processing is binaural integration/separation deficit. This occurs in the corpus callosum and is a result of poor communication between the two hemispheres of the brain. (ACENTA,2003) A person with this will have difficulty performing tasks that require intersensory and/or multi-sensory communication. They may have trouble with reading, spelling, writi...
These three groups were then asked to complete three different tasks. The first was to repeat and segment 20 different words (5 consonant-vowel-consonant, 5 CCVC, 5 CVCC, and 5 CCVCC) and two overall scores were administered to the participants. Both scores were out of a maximum of 20 points; the first score was based on giving 1 point for each correctly analyzed word, and the second score was based on giving 1 point for correctly analyzing medial vowels.
These skills are an important core separating normal and disabled readers. According to Hill (2006, p.134), phonemic awareness is a skill that focus’ on the small units of sound that affect meaning in words. For example, the following phoneme has three syllables, /c/, /a/ and /n/. These letters make three different small units of sound that can impact the meaning of words. Seely Flint, Kitson and Lowe (2014, p. 191), note that even the Australian Curriculum recognises the importance of phonemic awareness in the Foundation year, due to the ‘sound and knowledge’ sub-strand. This sub strand recognises syllables, rhymes and sound (phonemes) in spoken language. Rich discussions about topics of interest to children as well as putting attention to the sounds of language can help encourage phonemic awareness as well as improve students vocabulary and comprehension development. It is important to make awareness of phonemes engaging and interesting in preschool and in the early years so children can learn these skills early and become successful
Informal Reading Inventories (IRIs) are a commercial test that teachers use to evaluate students’ reading performance. QRI-5’s are just one type of IRI that are available to teachers. These informal tests are often used as a screening instrument to determine whether or not a student is reading on or below grade level. Some of the other uses of IRIs are seeing where students are struggling in their reading; for example fluency versus comprehension, to help them recognize where students are showing signs of frustration, to help teachers set up reading groups or even help with picking out appropriate reading material for their students. While the information gained in these informal tests are vital sometimes the additional information gained
Strengths: Tristan is at an Independent level in the 1st grade reading list for the San Diego Quick Assessment. He can accurately read all words in this list, with no errors. Even at the Frustration level, Tristan was still able to pronounce all consonant clusters. The student’s reading level as stated by the San Diego Quick Assessment of Reading Ability is the last grade-level word list in which the student reads eight or more words correctly. As indicated by the results of this assessment, where each word list contains 10 words, Grade 1 was the list in which Tristan read all words correctly.