Photosynthesis Lab Report

692 Words2 Pages

The results from the gel electrophoresis were inconclusive so students selected their genotype, with the results shown in Table 1. The controls were successful with the (+/+) homozygous, (-/-) homozygous, and heterozygous lanes having bands at 941, 641, and both 941 and 641 respectively. The class allelic frequencies were 56.3% for p and 43.8% for q, indicating that slightly more individuals had the Alu insert on their chromosomes (Table 2). When the Hardy-Weinberg equation was applied, there were some discrepancies as shown by Table 3 between the observed and calculated frequencies. The p frequency was observed at 10% higher than Hardy-Weinberg while the q frequency was observed at 10% lower. Discussion The results partially agreed with the working hypothesis. The student sample genotype was indeterminable, most likely due to PCR errors that …show more content…

Failure could have resulted from improper digestion by the restriction enzymes, forgotten steps in PCR preparation, and within the PCR process itself when replicating the template strands. In order for PCR to work, the cells need to be combined with a Master Mix, which contains DNA template, oligonucleotide primers, individual deoxynucleotide bases, Taq Polymerase, magnesium ions, and a salt buffer. If one of the components is missing, for example the buffer, the environment may not be conducive for successful PCR. Errors could also have occurred within thermal cycling. In the first two cycles the DNA was mostly been replicated and primers had attached to one end, lacking another upstream. In the third cycle the polymerase will extend the primers so that the precise portion between primers is the only part that is amplified (Figure 2). Errors within this process such as failure to attach the primers correctly, could have contributed to the inconclusive results shown in Figure

Open Document