More handpicked essays just for you.
Debate between public and private schools
Similarities between public and private schools
Private vs public school
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Debate between public and private schools
“There is no worse tyranny than to force a man to pay for what he does not want.” (Robert A. Heinlein) This is what is currently happening to families that do not use their local public school system. Private school families, childless families, and families that no longer have children in school should not have to pay public school taxes for their local township. This is because, unlike public school users, these families do not use this particular public service. Therefore, these families should not be required to pay public school taxes.
In addition to having to pay for private school tuition, private school families currently have to pay public school taxes as well. Having to pay for both school systems may put a financial burden on these families. If a particular family has more than one child or more than one child that is enrolled in a private school, this may also increase financial stress. The same idea goes for families that no longer have a child enrolled in a public school. That particular child may be attending college after they had graduated from a public high school....
No one is judged based on where they come from, the only thing that matters is your grades and test scores. They should speak volumes for itself and help you succeed. There isn’t a gap that is created by having a fancy school on your transcript. Having a private school on your transcripts creates like an italic and bold font to that person which stands out among a regular person with an ordinary font. Destroying all those that foster an unequal playing field is a huge disadvantage to those who can’t afford. Some would say that those who attend private schools are nothing more than flashy wealthy people trying to prove that their kid is better than local minority inner city school kids, but there shouldn’t be a price tag on education when it’s provided free by the
The improvements made by public schools should not be discounted, either. While there are certainly schools and school districts that remain very troubled those administrators and schools boards are not standing idly by. There are continuous improvements in such schools, and there needs to be even more. Taking money from them when efforts are being made to improve their condition will clearly on hinder such improvement. Private schools are and should remain an option for all parents, but our society mustn't waver when it comes to supporting our public schools.
With this many students, both state and federal representatives have made efforts to adopt reforms designed to make a solution to the funding inequality. The disproportion of funds first and foremost effects the amount of programs offered to children that vary from basic subjects such as: English, Math, and Science. This created the motivation to improve the quality of education for low-income neighborhoods by targeting resources other than property taxes and redirecting the states budgets. The goal the school districts all shared was the need to increase instruction, add after school activities, promote a well-rounded education, physical innovations to facilities and classrooms, and to update the academic resources. The popular demand that the funding to public education needs to correspond throughout all the school districts. Wealthy tax payers often argue that a region that depends on property taxes is the “American way.” This argument derives from the ideology that American success relies on perseverance and hard work, but if the playing field is uneven the higher born student has an advantage. “High property taxes—the burdens and perverse incentives they create, the rage they generate, the town-to-town school funding inequities they proliferate—…represent an endless New England nightmare…” (Peirce and Johnson, 2006). In the attempt to
Local governments rely on property tax as a source of revenue to pay for school. Yet people in the urban areas pay the higher tax than suburban and wealthy communities, states on the other hand, relies on The Average Daily Attendance (ADA), which calculates state aid to school districts, tends to discriminate against urban school districts with high absentee rates by automatically, and excludes 15 percent of its student aid. Therefore, in many urban areas, the state ratio of funding remains significantly lower than 50 percent out of the tree entities the federal government allocates the least amount of funding. Residents in these areas who are under edu...
Then comes the education part, where according to the author Jonathan Kozol in his book Savage Inequalities Children in America’s schools, property tax is one of the main financial distributions that goes towards local schools. In Kozol’s book he quotes that, “typically in the United States, very poor communities place high priority on education, and they often tax themselves at higher rates than do the very affluent communities.
The American people have a decline of confidence in the educational institutions in America. This has lead to theories behind how to improve the public schools' situation. The most recent argument has been over school vouchers, which allow students to use a determined sum of taxpayers' money to help in the tuition costs of private schools. This use of public funds for private education should not be allowed because it would discriminate against students who would be going to private schools for economic, political and social reasons. It will segregate the classes even more than they are today because in order for a voucher to be helpful to a family, they must have a substantial amount of money to begin with, resulting in a stratified society. Primarily however, school vouchers are a violation of the national constitution and most state constitutions.
Many students are attracted to the sound of a free college education; even political candidates have started using the promise of free college to win votes for their campaign. The idea does sound good to present college students or future college students, free college for whoever wants it. Such action would allow many students to attend college that previously couldn’t. As many people hit the roadblock of, “How do I pay for a higher education?” This is due to the fact that the average cost for a bachelor’s degree in the United States for in-state tuition is around 18,000 dollars a year (NCES). This issue has been debated about for years and has been included in many national and state government discussions and political campaigns. While
However, if a student chooses to attend a private high school, it is not free or government funded. According to data from the Nation Center for Education Statistics, the average annual cost of private high school in America is about $13,030. Aside from tuition, private schools also acquire students to wear a uniform, which also has to be paid for. Students do not have to pay for living expenses because they’ll be coming to school from home and most schools provide textbooks for students. The expenses in high school are way less than college expenses.
Private schools charge tuition however, public schools are offered free of charge. For many parents, this is the hardest factor to think. From elementary to high schools all work with the help of tax money. “Many public schools stand in the peak of education due to outdated text books” (Clark 21). Most of these public schools are traditional schools with educational standards set by each state in the United States. Education is free because public schools rely on federal, state, local taxes, funding of these educational grounds can be cut when requirements are not met. Also, public schools have to follow state guidelines on what they can teach, and how children need to be evaluated. Most private schools depend on their own funding, which may come from parents through tuition, grants, and donations. Private schools also seek money help from alumni, businesses, and community organizations from around the country to help them survive. If the school is partnered with a religious organization; with Catholic schools, the religious organization like the Catholic Church may be an important source of funding for them. Also private schools are free to offer religious education, or curriculums not regulated by state
Imagine a world where teachers didn’t exist. Nobody would learn how to do any of the skills educators teach us how to do now. That world isn’t too far away, unless educators get paid more for their work. Teachers should receive a higher salary. Teaching is a difficult job, education is important, and if we stay with the same we have now, we may have no teachers.
Congratulations on your presidency, I hope that your transfer into the White House is easy and uninterrupted. Once you are well situated in your new position, I hope that you can make some changes including, getting rid of diet sodas in schools, whole wheat in schools and changing Obamacare. I believe that schools shouldn't have diet soda because it is worse to your body than normal soda and is linked to several diseases, so I believe that this should be changed. On a similar note, I also believe that whole wheat shouldn't be served in schools because most students very much dislike whole wheat cookies and pizza and bread, so I think having that with your executive power you should remove whole wheat from schools entirely. Another point I would
When we think of private education, we immediately think of wealthy kids and posh school uniforms, and tend to forget the significant benefits that private schools offer. With the extra cash available from tuition costs, private schools can spend more on teaching tools and resources to help students learn more efficiently. For example: a public school’s budget only allows it to have slow-performing 2005 computers for student use, where a private school can provide fast, new, laptops that can be carried by the student throughout the school day for educational purposes. Eveline Adomait summarizes it
Many people in today’s society believe it’s wise to send their children to private schools. In making the decision on whether to put children in public or private schools, they look to four main factors: curriculum, class size, the graduation rate, and cost. When people have to pay for something, their first thought is, “Will I be getting what I’m paying for?” With a private school education, the amount you have to pay is usually well worth it. Public schools offer diversity. Here students can find people who are just like them and can associate better. Wherever you live, you have to send your child to the closest school. There’s no choice on what public school you can send your child to, whereas for private schools you can pick to send your child there. It’s not an easy choice for parents to decide, but many factors point toward a guarantee that a good education would be achieved, which is most important.
...mpared to privately funded school sizes. According to (NCES) the average school size for a central city, state-funded school is 1,083 compared to 398 in privately funded school. That means teachers will have an even harder time giving a state-funded the same one on one time when compared to the privately funded school. Since the education is not equal to private schools should be abolished.
There are many decisions for parents to choose private or public school for their kids. Every parent wants what is best for his or her child. A person's education is one of the most important aspects in determining whether or not they will become a productive member of society. Education is so important. We need to look at both public and private schools to find out if there is a difference. Private schools are a better choice than public school for many reasons. Private encourages strong quality teaching, encourages higher education learning, and inhibit the rampant of bullying.