Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The zoo roles in conservation
The zoo roles in conservation
The educational benefits of keeping animals in zoos
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: The zoo roles in conservation
Yes we should have zoos. They help species that are endangered survive, they can and have even introduced animals into the wild. Many times as well zoos have taken in animals that are being abused.
Zoos all around the US are homes too many animals, some of these are animals that are an endangered species. When these species are doomed or be extinct from there natural habitat due to human cause shouldn’t we make a point to give them a new home and put them back into their old home. The golden frog is a animal that is almost entirely extinct from its natural habitat due to a toxic fungi. Zoos all across the US have been breeding this symbol of panama with hopes of maintaining biodiversity for the animals. Although reintroducing an animals into the wild is often a very rare success story there have been accounts in the US that were successful. One example is the red wolf in the southeastern portion of the US.
…show more content…
Also being able to visit a zoo can make a person feel like they understand nature better by seeing how these animals may act in a habitat that is somewhat similar to where they would live in the wild. It is argued that zoos are a shepa way to see how these animals would act in the wild. You could also do something like in Rwanda to see gorillas in the wild, but this is 750 dollars for a chance to see something that's not even guaranteed. Zoos are just more convenient to the public to see these animals as
The strongest reason for this is “The Panamanian golden frog is critically endangered. Hundreds of them live at zoos across the United States. However, this should be ignored because zoos are taking care of the species and away from predators. If the species were to live in the wild, there are chances that the animal would get harmed by other animals since that one frog lived in a zoo for a while, it would behave differently that other frogs who never experienced life in a zoo. In order to balance the two sides, zoos should be located in the wild to keep an eye out on the animals, and to have visitor be able to see their natural
Millions of people visit zoos every year, not knowing that they can be very inhumane to most animals. Zoos may be a very good tourist attraction and a good field trip, that could be very educational if it is a good zoo, but they should not be allowed to carry all of the animals it does. With zoos carrying many different types of animals only certains should be held in the zoo. Only animals that are about to be extinct should be in the zoos. Since there are very few of an animal that is about to go extinct, it would be a very safe option to have them kept there.
Think back to your first time at the zoo with you family, you got to see all the birds, the tigers, the lions, the bears. It was a nice memory, but what if that zoo never existed? And those awesome lions you got to see? They went extinct because no habitats were built to repopulate. That’s what groups like PETA are proposing, they believe that animals will all survive if they are left in their natural habitats.
They’re nature empowers them to run free. Free in the wilderness, where they were born. Unfortunately, zoos go against the course of nature, and ultimately ruins their natural instincts. The origins of zoos date back to colonial times when victorious nations would exploit animals from conquered lands and show them off.
Animals were kept in small display areas with as many species as space would allow. Today, however, zoos are meant to entertain and educate people and also have a strong emphasis on scientific research and species conservation. Zoos should be banned for
One reason we should get rid zoos is in the wild there are way more animals than the zoos. In “Life span of elephants in zoos and in the wild,” African elephants live up to 15-20 years in zoos and in the wild they live up to 50-55. That is way different. There are some endangered species in the zoos and they are dying way earlier than in the wild. Also Asian elephants are living up to 15-20 years in zoos and 40-45 years in the wild.
Visualize a small space, large crowds of people and loud noises. That's what it's like to be in a zoo, captivated and being stared down by people. Zoos should be banned for multiple reasons. To keep animals alive, they should be taken out of zoos and live naturally. Zoos should be banned because animals are taken away from their natural habitats, animals are taken care of improperly, and animals do not have the vast space they have in the rightful habitat.
Zoos, if managed and run correctly, are beneficial to a majority of animals and endangered species. Zoos were created by humans to display animals as works of art, but now zoos are much more. Many zoos have breeding programs to help animals repopulate. Animals are also safe from predators, common but fatal diseases, and even illegal wildlife poachers. Lastly, zoos give the public a chance to see animals up close and offer chances to have real live animal interactions, along with providing educational experiences.
Going to the zoo or circus with the family has always been a great activity. You get to spend time seeing the animals and having a laugh or two. However, have you ever thought about how the animals feel. Zoos are not able to provide sufficient space for animals, and often house them in small cages or too small of fenced areas. Circus animals are tortured by putting them in cages and forcing them to be entertainment.
With the dawn of 21st century, the demand of animals rights are increasing day by day. Some people argue that establishment of zoo has greatly helped in the welfare of animals. However, some people vehemently contend that zoos are hurting our animals. I strongly disagree that zoos should be banned because in the modern world zoos are the ultimate source of preservation of animals interests. Zoos provide animals with a comfortable environment.
Would you be willing to risk your fun and enjoyment for an animal’s happiness? Everytime families go to the zoo and give them money, they are making an animal suffer. The more money zoos get, the more animals are taken. Animals are depressed every day because they are being deprived of their rights; their right to be free. It’s obvious that zoos are harmful to animals because the animals become depressed, the scientists wouldn’t learn much, and because they are not prepared enough when they are released back into the wild.
It has been discovered by Benjamin Beck, former associate director of biological programs at the National Zoo in Washington, D.C., that in the past century, only 16 of 145 reintroduction programs worldwide have ever been able to successfully restore any animal population to the wild (Fravel). To further add to this shocking fact, the majority of those 16 successful reintroduction programs were executed by government agencies, not zoos (Fravel). In conjunction, David Hancocks, a renowned former zoo director with over 30 years of experience, has determined that under three percent of the budgets of the 212 AZA accredited zoos go toward conservation efforts (Fravel). Many of the other 2,188 non-AZA accredited zoos in the United States, expend no money toward wildlife conservation
Zoos are an unsuitable environment for wild animals and should, therefore, be abolished. Firstly, zoo animals are kept in a very confined area compared with their vast natural habitat. Secondly, breeding programmes are far less successful than zoos claim. Thirdly, zoo animals are exposed to many diseases and other dangers.
Tigers, lions, giraffes, and other exotic animals are rarely seen in the wild. However the public, without humans and/or animals being harmed at the same time, can see exotic animals when a zoo opens. Zoos for many are a wonderful experience, but to others they see the animals as being treated poorly and not able to roam free. These people do not consider the beneficial sides of zoos. Zoos around the world help species that have been endangered by protecting and caring for them. Otherwise they would have became extinct and killed for their valuable fur or feathers. Zoos were created for a purpose that needed to be filled. If there were no purpose for them they would have not been created. Zoos are needed and if there is a need in this world, the spot will most likely be filled without hesitation. Some zoos were not trained properly and do not treat their animals very well. Some bad zoos do not feed their animals enough and keep them in a confined cage. Although some zoos are harmful for both animals and people, many of them are good zoos and take care of their animals better than most people take care of them selves. It is amazing to be able to see such care and love are associated with zoos. Not only do zoos help the endangered animals they also help people learn to respect such amazing creatures. Zoos are a good attribute to society because they promote education, research, protect, conserve, and outlook.
Zoos bring human kind closer to wild life. Though, sometimes that means taking the animal out of its natural habitat. Some animals have lost most of their habitat and are on the verge of extinction. In this way, the zoo helps the animals rather than using them as a form of human entertainment. Zoos also allow humans to study different kinds of animals more closely. Some zoos on the other hand manipulate the animals to acquire as much revenue as possible rather than being concerned with the welfare of each animal.