Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Views on animal captivity
An essay on animals in captivity
Animals in captivity for and against essay
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Views on animal captivity
Many people go to their local zoo to get up close and interact with animals that can only be seen on television or in the wild. Zoos can provide a fun and educating environment to the public. However, animals in zoos are living in confined areas behind fences and glass enclosures. These animals are forced to entertain us whilst we flash our cameras in front of their faces, and let our children bang and knock on their glass enclosures. The majority of us are oblivious that we have been laughing at zoo animals (this whole time). Is the zoo really considered an acceptable form of entertainment when these animals are in captivity? Going to the zoo is a sadistic pleasure. We have no respect for animals if they spend their lives behind bars for our …show more content…
It is extremely cruel to put them in captivity and their abnormal behaviour is expressing signs of insanity. No one would want to live behind bars and be gazed at all day. Zoo animals experience this torture every day and they have no choice. They are suffering in jail and are showing signs of zoochosis. Zoochosis, (are?) the stereotypical stress behaviours of an animal (which) can be repetitive movements, repeatedly retracing their steps or biting the bars of their enclosure. One of the animals that suffer the most in zoos is elephants. A government-funded study of elephants in zoos in the United Kingdom found that fifty-four percent of the elephants showed zoochosis when the zoo is open to the public. It is not surprising at all to hear that elephants in captivity are stressed due to their incredibly small enclosures and the lackluster environment zoos provide. Both humans and animals in captivity experience stress. A human in jail may experience stress during their service. However, their stress is only temporary as they know that one day they will no longer be kept behind bars. Animals in captivity, on the other hand, are kept in their enclosures until they die and therefore their stress is permanent. Surprisingly, elephants in captivity that are protected and cared for have shorter lives than their friends living in the wild live less than half as long as their friends living in the wild (one living in their natural habitat). In 2008, researchers of the Compromised Survivorship in Zoo Elephants study analyzed over 4500 elephants (life spans). The results show that the median life span for African elephants in European zoos is seventeen years, compared to fifty-six years of elephants living in their natural habitat. Their short life expectancy can be blamed due to the stress they experience. Elephants are not provided the large grazing areas they are familiar with and many of them are alone
Keeping animals locked in cages, bored and cramped up in such a small space is an awful sight to show the children. It creates an image in the little minds of children that animals are to be treated like they don’t matter. They say Zoos are a place where children can learn about the wild, exotic animals, but in reality it doesn't teach them anything only that they are meant to be caged up, which is wrong. Also, it is really painful to see the animals bored and lonely, so why should people keep letting them do this to these beautiful creatures. Animal captivity for entertainment should end to let them go to their rightful home.
The entertainment value does not contradict the morals of taking a wild animal and caging it, so we can stare at it for a few minutes. I will be honest, I love being able to take my kids to the zoo and aquarium. We enjoy walking around looking at all the exotic animals that cannot be seen while walking around the local park. The animal’s personalities and temperaments we see at the zoos is hardly the animal they would be in the wild. The visual education we are receiving is altered and therefore, false. Imagine you are put in a room very similar to your own, with your best friend or spouse, and you were told to behave ‘normally’. You can dance, laugh, talk, play, anything, but you will be watched by an estimated 5,000 people a day. No one would see the true you; the same goes for wild animals. We are able to have a better understanding of animals in their natural habitat rather than a miniature version filled with artificial objects in the local zoo or aquari...
Zoos have been with us throughout our history, and can provide a good barometer of public beliefs and values at any given time. Therefore it seems necessary to explore whether in today’s society contemporary zoos are a means of educating and conserving or still seek to control and exhibit animal others for human benefit. In order to make this assessment there are a number of contributing factors. Firstly it is important to establish context by considering the history of zoos and looking at the changes from the early menageries to contemporary zoos who strive to be institutions of refuge for animals facing twenty-first century global challenges. This links into how the physical space of zoos has changed over time and whether these advancements have made any crucial difference to the welfare of animals. Following this conservation, education and scientific research will be explored in detail in order to assess whether they provide good enough motives for keeping animals in captivity. I will seek to argue that although attempts have been made to point zoos in the direction of conservation and education, in my opinion the concepts of dominance and human superiority are still at the core of modern zoos.
One of the many disadvantages animals have is being locked in cages of zoos, is to enjoy the quality of freedom and independence. The animals can’t enjoy the satisfaction of catching their own prey, or the relief of living in their own natural habitat. Plus, the size of the zoo provides for the animals is too small, so the animals don’t get the proper exercise like they would in the wild. Studies have shown tigers and lions have around 18,000 times less space in zoos then they would in their natural habitat. In fact , Woburn Safari Parks was keeping its lion...
Zoo captivity is substandard and inadequate for animals. Zoo animals are deprived of their right as animals they are treated unjustly and unfairly. Animals should not be forced to kept in a cage away from their natural environment and be used as a form of entertainment to humans. The animals also suffer from stress and are driven insane by being trapped behind bars. The zoo is supposed to provide safety to these endangered animals but instead, these zoo animals are put at risk towards a variety of dangers such as vulnerability to diseases and starvation.
The idea of a zoo is a noble idea. The objective of the zoo is to be a sanctuary where animals live in safety from dangers such as poachers and diseases. This wildlife refuge prevents animals from going extinct, and new generations of people can learn about these animals and appreciate them. Due to human shortcomings, some zoos are concrete prisons or execution chambers. The video, “Captive Animal Misery in European Zoos”, provided by Born Free Foundation on Youtube.com that is published on 12th January 2012 shows animals in poor living conditions. In that video, there is an elephant in a small metallic enclosure. In fact, there are no plants or anything that would be in the elephant’s habitat. The video continue to show multiple images of animals in concrete pens. These animals paced around the walls in anguish. Not only in Europe, but zoos all over the world bring misery to animals.
" This quote proves that either the zoo isn't supporting their needs correctly, or being held captive messes with their mental state. Which tells us that no matter the zoo, they can't possibly beat the animal's natural habitat, the wild.
Animals should not be held captive in zoos because it is inhumane and unfair to the animals. There are so many records of terrible things that have happened to animals in zoos over the past few centuries, the go under the radar too often. Too few people even know about these animal care atrocities, and therefore the New York Times decided to bring light upon this situation. The Times did a first-of-its-kind analysis of 390 elephant fatalities at accredited U.S. zoos over the past 50 years (Berens 3). It found that most of the elephants died from injury or disease linked to conditions of their captivity, from chronic foot problems caused by standing on hard surfaces to musculoskeletal disorders from inactivity caused by being penned or chained for days and weeks at a time.
The animals being kept in captivity could not be interviewed; their side of the story will be based on interpretation of their movement and interaction with animals in the zoo and in the wild. Are animals better suited to live in the harsh conditions of the wild or are they better suited to live their lives safely in captivity? Many animal rights activists argue that animals should be allowed to live their lives in the wild instead of in captivity. That we as humans have no right to alter the fate of other species, nor use them for our personal benefit. PETA, who is well known for their animal rights views, argue that “Captive animals are deprived of everything that is natural and important to them and as a result, they become bored and lonely and many even suffer from a condition called zoochosis.”
middle of paper ... ... Freedom is precious and animals are constantly suffering mentally and physically from the lack of freedom that captivity brings to them. Although many zoos are visited by millions of people annually, they still operate at a loss and have to make budget cuts. Funds that should be used to provide humane conditions for animals are often wasted on cosmetic improvements such as landscaping, refreshment stands, and gift shops in order to draw visitors, leaving the animals behind steel bars and glass trapped in a concrete jungle for no reason without hope of ever being free.
Even though some zoos have an endangered species exhibit with the intention of protecting and rehabilitating animals, many do not do an adequate job of protecting the animals. Zoos have been harmful to the very animals they have sworn to protect. Animals in captivity often suffer from anxiety, boredom and other severe issue related to prolonged confinement. Most animals are unable to thrive in small enclosure with unnatural weather and climates. For example elephants are known to walk as far as 30 miles per day, but the association of Zoos and aquariums only require a space the measures $0 feet by 45 feet, which is about the size of a three car garage, to house these large animals. (peta.org) the drastic difference in the amount of space their allowed ...
Sometimes the days in a zoo begin no different than this particular day, animals are held captive not knowing what it is to be free. Zoos allow humans to experience the joys of what a ¨wild¨ animal looks like, however some people find this as enjoyment in all of the wrong ways. One day teenagers came into the zoo and began to throw rocks at the animals that could only hide or take the beating despite their need to defend themselves. They took it so far that a gorilla tried to get out of his cage and run off, ultimately killing the captivated victim. When animals are kept in zoos or other enclosure they lose their wild instinct and are very likely unhappy and so I believe that all animals should be free.
Sounds of laughter, joy, and amusement usually overflow in the atmosphere of animal sanctuaries and zoos, since people visit these attractions for the purpose of entertainment. In the United States, animal sanctuaries and zoos have nearly two hundred thousand visitors each year, according to the zoo statistics computed by the Statistics Brain Institute (“Zoo Statistics.”). These zoos and sanctuaries are the proper places where people of all ages, from children to elders, can observe and learn about wildlife animals. Visitors receive entertainment from the wildlife animals that are preserved in the zoos; however, these animals receive a considerable amount of stress from the zoo environment itself. Zoo animals under these conditions rarely inhabit
Ever wonder why the lions at a zoo do not move very much? This is because they are depressed, and there are studies to prove it. “Many animals held in captivity begin to form abnormal symptoms referred to as ‘zoochosis.’ These neurotic and atypical behaviors occur as a result of boredom, depression, frustration, a lack of mental and physical enrichment, and removal from their natural habitat and social structures” (Last Chance for Animals). Zoos are just outright cruel.
Zoos are an unsuitable environment for wild animals and should, therefore, be abolished. Firstly, zoo animals are kept in a very confined area compared to their vast natural habitat. Secondly, breeding programmes are far less successful than zoos claim. Thirdly, zoo animals are exposed to many diseases and other dangers. Zoo animals are usually kept in very cramped enclosures and do not behave like their wild counterparts.