Pablo Figueroa's Subversion And Nostalgia In Photography

653 Words2 Pages

4. After the events of any disaster, photographs of the destruction and the people always circulate one way or another. How the arts react to the disaster will depend on the artist or the perspective/motive they are trying to fulfill. In Pablo Figueroa’s “Subversion and nostalgia in art photography of the Fukushima nuclear disaster”, he states that the meaning of a photograph is created by cultural context, and can be understood as texts that gain sense in the broader photographic discourse. According to Figueroa, after the Fukushima earthquake, most of the images published nationally were representations pertaining to photojournalism. International photojournalists covered 3.11, but views sustained by domestic and foreign media were dissimilar. Japanese critics pointed out how foreign presses went after the “photographic effect”—creation of images that accentuate tragedy and fear—to display the disaster. Susan Sontag argued that no photographer could determine the meaning of a …show more content…

Furthermore, meanings behind or found in photographs can be determined by cultural definition and are manifestations of interest. Looking at the Fukushima disaster, overwhelming sense of loss and anger among those who were affected can view the images differently than those who had not experienced the disaster or weren’t as affected as others. Figueroa looks at Toshiya Watanabe’s photo book, 18 months. Born and raised in the Fukushima Prefecture, residents of the town he was born in had to evacuate and the town was declared off-limits. The images in his photo book presented a before and after of the town, how the town changed three

Open Document