Ariella Azoulay's The Civil Contract Of Photography

475 Words1 Page

In this paper I will focus on the work of Ariella Azoulay, I will compare her ideas with Susan Sontag’s arguments about the spectator of photography in relation to the ethical and political responsibilities which are present in the contemporary photographic practice. I will also have a look at Joscelyn Jurich’s perspective on the two authors mentioned above.

Ariella Azoulay in her book ‘The Civil Contract of Photography’ 2008, talks about photographic theory in combination with political philosophy. The idea that citizenship is based on a “new ontological-political understanding of photography” (23). The photographic act which involves different mediums, those are – the photographer, camera, subject photographed and the spectator; where none …show more content…

Azoulay explains her usage of the term ‘contract’ in order to replace other terms such as ‘compassion,’ ‘empathy’ or ’shame’. The result of this is that the understanding of the connections created through photography is grounded, and so are the modes of public circulation. This creates a public sphere that provides a general and evenly distributed condition of citizenship. An argument that the author makes, challenges both modernist and postmodernist approaches in relation to “photographs of horror’’ which portray injured populations. Azoulay makes a critique towards other theories of photography as being too closely fixed on the aesthetic considerations, through examination of such images in relationship to the question of citizenship. Alongside the national and market forces, Azoulay argues that these theories are a fragment of the process of socialization that is limiting and in charge of our

Open Document