Obama Pros And Cons

1855 Words4 Pages

The past year has truly been an inimitable one, from mudslinging campaign commercials to scandals released and spread virally over the internet. There were many ups and downs for both candidates, Donald Trump and Hillary Clinton. Not only was the outcome shocking to many, but the ride to November 8th was bumpy, to say the least and, regardless of the candidate one supported, it was a rough ride for us all. Both Secretary Clinton and Mr. Trump varied greatly on many levels. Secretary Clinton lost the general election after she did not receive enough electoral votes, despite winning the popular vote. I argue Secretary Clinton could have achieved the electoral votes needed to win the presidency, had she campaigned harder, relied less on the voting …show more content…

Mr. Trump stated he had planned on repealing and replacing President Obama’s healthcare program known as Obamacare. A proper plan regarding what he would replace it with was not released, but he stood firm on repealing Obamacare. Secretary Clinton completely disagreed with Mr. Trump on what the country needed in regards to healthcare. Where Mr. Trump felt it would benefit the American people to completely get rid of Obamacare, Secretary Clinton made it clear that not only would she keep Obamacare if elected, she would expand and reform it. Many times, these topics were brought up in at least one of the three debates, as they were extremely important to the citizens of the country. These three topics of policy exemplified the divide between the candidates. For many, it was difficult to stand in the middle, as no candidate seemed to offer such perspectives. For that reason, I argue this created extreme partisan between the citizens and may have even played a part in Secretary Clinton’s loss. Having such partisan policy standpoints led many to settle for one side or another. Perhaps Secretary Clinton drifted too far and led many who normally vote democrat to cross party lines and support Mr. Trump …show more content…

Similar to the other two states mentioned, Pennsylvania is normally viewed as a “blue state.” However, the electoral votes were not considered wholly devoted to the Democratic Party, thus one saw more of Secretary Clinton campaigning here compared to the other two states. Secretary Clinton and Mr. Trump had many individuals campaigning on their behalves in an attempt to cover as much of the state as possible within the limited time available (Schultheis). When it comes to polling, Secretary Clinton appears to have the upper hand in the state. After analyzing other polls, RealClearPolitics stated that Secretary Clinton was leading the race by 2.1%

Open Document