My Sister's Keeper Rhetorical Analysis

797 Words2 Pages

In “My Sister’s Keeper,” Jodi Picoult wrote, “The answer is that there is no good answer. We fumble through and make decisions that allow us to sleep at night--because morals are more important than ethics, and love is more important than law.” By the end of the book, George was faced with the tough decision to end Lennie’s life or not. Some may believe that his choice was inconsiderate and selfish, and is guilty because of it, but that is a shallow course of thought. Confronted with his situation, George did what he considered best for Lennie and cannot be blamed for that. After much consideration and thought, he saved him from the horrors he would have had to face and freed him of all his troubles. There were many tragic consequences waiting if Lennie was kept alive. The most immediate is that he may be killed by the farm workers. Curley said, “I’m going for my shotgun. I’ll kill the big son-of-a-bitch myself. I’ll shoot ‘im in the guts” (Steinbeck, 95). If Lennie was found, he most likely would have been murdered out of rage. A slow, painful death would have ensued …show more content…

They have lived together since very early in their lives and he has always taken care of him no matter what. Steinbeck wrote, “George shook himself. He said woodenly, ‘If I was alone I could live so easy.” His voice was monotonous, had no emphasis” (103). When George is mean to Lennie and talks of life without him, it really has no meaning. They stayed together even after they got in trouble and he always watched over him as best as he could. Shooting him was not just an easy way of getting out of taking care of him. To demonstrate this, Steinbeck wrote, “George raised the gun and his hand shook, and he dropped his hand to the ground again” (105). He did not want to take his life, but he knew he had to and that it was the responsible thing to do. Killing Lennie was the most difficult decision George has ever had to make in his

Open Document