Essay On Was George Justified In Killing Lennie Justified

1013 Words3 Pages

“I killed my best friend,” was the exact thought that hovered in George as he watched his best friend, Lennie, recumbent, cold, and still, on the grass by the riverbanks. In the book of Mice and Men, George faced the dilemma of knowing that he had killed the one he loved the most. Though it was no accident, it was for the good of Lennie. If Lennie had been allowed to live, he would only face the worst of what life has to offer. So instead of having to watch his best friend in pain, George took the initiative to end all of the cruelty of the world and send Lennie to a better place. Therefore, George was justified in killing Lennie.
It is true that Lennie would be allowed to live if George hadn't killed him. Lennie and George could have escaped and lived in a cave. They would be free and able to do whatever …show more content…

Another option for Lennie would be the placement in an asylum. Here, he would receive food, shelter, mental health treatment, and possibly medication. Finally, Lennie could have also been placed in jail. He would have food and shelter, but more importantly, he would have the protection from the revengeful actions of Curley. However, if allowed to live, Lennie would have suffered. If Lennie were placed in jail, he would have been bullied and assaulted by the other inmates. They would quickly be aware of his mental challenges and take advantage of him. Unfortunately, George would not be there to protect and comfort him. In an asylum, Lennie would have truly suffered. Mental health treatment in the 1930s often consisted of being restrained in a strait jacket or even offered a lobotomy. Many would cringe at the thought of a lobotomy, a process of which certain parts of the brain would be performed surgery on. Lennie’s brain without a lobotomy is already malfunctioning, if he had been offered a lobotomy, he would become nonfunctional. No emotions, no movement,

Open Document