Marche Slave Musical Analysis

645 Words2 Pages

Tchaikovsky's Marche Slave is a piece of music that requires a lot of musicianship and emotion to play. Even though the piece should be played like a march, which is said literally in the title, it does not mean loud and metronomic. The Stony Brook Wind Ensemble appears to be made up of talented musicians. However, this was not the best performance of this piece for multiple reasons. I think the piece should be played in more of a largo-style, because it is a Slavonic Marche. When the bass voices play the opening passage, I imagine slaves in shackles moving slowly in unison. The opening from the musical, Les Miserables, is the same kind of feel and pulse. The conductor interpreted this piece as a fast march starting from the beginning, which was not the way I hear this piece, or Tchaikovsky, I’m guessing. …show more content…

At parts, the Tubas were not together pitch-wise, it almost sounded like they were dissonant between quarter tones. The trumpets were super loud and not together. This may be because the ensemble had at least 12 trumpets. Still, the trumpets should aware of the instrumentation. The French Horns were also mediocre. They were a bit loud and cracked high notes too much, as well as the trumpets. Articulation was not together for the entire band. In a piece like this, staccato and legato are in two separate worlds. So, the players should have emphasized when they should play staccato vs. legato. Percussion was too loud and heavy sounding. I could tell that the stick heights from the snare drummer and timpanist were really high from the video. Finally, there was little to no dynamic contrasts. Everyone seemed to just play loudly, the entire time. Even if there is literally no mp crescendo to ff written, for example, the development of the melody and orchestration should be helped with natural dynamics. This should have been mentioned by the conductor during a

More about Marche Slave Musical Analysis

Open Document