Latona and the Frogs by David Teniers II is an oil on copper painted from 1640-1650, and is a small piece, about 9.8 in. by 15 in. I chose this piece because this piece is painted in the 17th century but the style strongly represents art from the renaissance period. There are a lot of similar elements between this piece and the style that is used in the Renaissance period. First off, I noticed that there is aerial perspective, where the viewer focuses on Latona and her infant babies Apollo and Diana. In the background there is a field and village. In the foreground, there is Latona with her children, along with several frog humans to the left side of the painting. Latona and her infant babies remind me of Raphael's piece Madonna in the Meadow, where the background is also a plain village. However, what makes Latona and the Frogs different from art from the Renaissance period is that it there are two …show more content…
Latona and her children are all looking up to the sky as if looking at the angels. They also have their hands reaching up towards the sky as if asking for the angels' help. The caption also mentions that Latona is a goddess and is wandering Earth with her children. Also, the sunlight that is on Latona and her children connects Latona and her children to the heavens. The contrast of light and darkness between Latona and her children and the peasant frogs shows the difference between a peasant and a heavenly being. This shows that the piece is a religious piece and a piece that is related greatly to mythology. In conclusion, Latona and the frogs is a great piece from the 17th century that carries much of the Renaissance style of painting. It is a very interesting and entertaining piece to look at with the human frogs, and with the story captain next to the painting, the viewer is able to grasp the whole picture and why there are frog
... study for the overall concept they appear rather as abstract patterns. The shadows of the figures were very carefully modeled. The light- dark contrasts of the shadows make them seem actually real. The spatial quality is only established through the relations between the sizes of the objects. The painting is not based on a geometrical, box like space. The perspective centre is on the right, despite the fact that the composition is laid in rows parallel to the picture frame. At the same time a paradoxical foreshortening from right to left is evident. The girl fishing with the orange dress and her mother are on the same level, that is, actually at equal distance. In its spatial contruction, the painting is also a successful construction, the groups of people sitting in the shade, and who should really be seen from above, are all shown directly from the side. The ideal eye level would actually be on different horizontal lines; first at head height of the standing figures, then of those seated. Seurats methods of combing observations which he collected over two years, corresponds, in its self invented techniques, to a modern lifelike painting rather than an academic history painting.
This fictional story, Lusus Laturae, is written by Margaret Atwood. According to Merriam-Webster dictionary, the origin of the Lusus Naturae is from Latin and the meaning is “freak of nature.” That is direct enough to assume the story is about a monster figure that will be a symbol of the story. According to the book “Freak of Nature,” the history of freak of nature to scientists and philosophers is an unfortunate, grotesque creature because it is odd or abnormal such as a conjoined twin which has two heads and shared a body (Blumberg 5). The criterion of being odd or abnormal starts from the visual difference seen by people. In the story, through the narration and point of view, character, symbol and figurative language, plot, and setting, it is revealed that the society and even the family ostracizes the protagonist who is defined as a monster due to her different appearance from others.
This piece is acrylic, oilstick, and spray paint on wood panel that is 186.1 centimeters in height and 125.1 centimeters in width. This piece features a human-like figure in the center that is mostly half red and half black. This figure has a gray head with one yellow eye and one light gray eye and above its head is a black halo. The background consists of patches of various colors such as light blue, black, dark red, light green, beige, turquoise, pink, and yellow. On the bottle left corner there is a figure drawn that looks like a fish and has a strip of mustard yellow painted through it. Also towards the bottom right of the artwork, there is some drawn on letters that almost look like words but are messily painted over with a desert sand color. This piece is my favorite because I find it aesthetically pleasing. There is a lot going on in this piece that makes looking at it genuinely interesting. The colors that Basquiat choses for the background go very well together and overall compliment the figure in the center. I like how incredibly expressive this piece is and it makes me want to buy a canvas and start painting that I desire. I also like how the human-like figure is drawn. One could see what looks like an outlined ribcage on the figure, which makes me believe that the head is actually a skull. Upon further research I learned that Basquiat was
This painting is an oil-on-canvas painting that was painted by John William Waterhouse in 1888. The painting measures at 200 centimeters by 153 centimeters which converted to inches is 60.2 inches by 78.7 inches. The painting is one of Waterhouse’s best known oil paintings. This painting is said to be a representation from a scene from Alfred, Lord Tennyson’s 1833 poem titled “The Lady of Shallot”. The poem “The Lady of Shallot” was built upon the Arthurian legend of Elaine of Astolat, which she was mentioned in the Italian novella titled Donna di Scalotta. Tennyson’s work was popular with many Pre-Raphaelite poets and painters. Some of the artists that illustrated pain...
During the years of Rococo art there were tons of other artists, whose works are still very famous to this day. Some of them including: Jean Honoré Fragonard and his piece, “The Swing,” Antoine Watteau and his work, “Les Champs Elysées,” and Francois Lemoyne and his piece, “Time Saving Truth from Falsehood and Envy.” All these paintings, done by very different men living in different parts of the eighteenth-century all share the common sickly sweet, airy, lightness of Rococo art; from the people, to the clothes, and colors all of the art is very
Jules Bastien-Lepage is the artist who painted Joan of Arc in 1879. He painted a masterpiece using oil on canvas. He used a 100 x 110 in. Medium. This is a skillful representation of young girl amazed by the sight of saints in her garden in Lorraine, France. They're inspiring her to take arms against the English who invaded her homeland. The significant formal elements are lines, colors, and space. The movement of horizontal lines pulls the eye upward towards her face. The light on Joan of arc emphasizes the importance of her presence. Then diagonal lines move the eye to the saints seen in the trees. I'm drawn diagonally from the saints to the illuminated house in the background giving the piece space, perspective, and depth. This unifies the
The painting is organized simply. The background of the painting is painted in an Impressionist style. The blurring of edges, however, starkly contrasts with the sharp and hard contours of the figure in the foreground. The female figure is very sharp and clear compared to the background. The background paint is thick compared to the thin lines used to paint the figures in the foreground. The thick paint adds to the reduction of detail for the background. The colors used to paint the foreground figures are vibrant, as opposed to the whitened colors of the Impressionist background. The painting is mostly comprised of cool colors but there is a range of dark and light colors. The light colors are predominantly in the background and the darker colors are in the foreground. The vivid color of the robe contrasts with the muted colors of the background, resulting in an emphasis of the robe color. This emphasis leads the viewer's gaze to the focal part of the painting: the figures in the foreground. The female and baby in the foreground take up most of the canvas. The background was not painted as the artist saw it, but rather the impression t...
The painting that actually caught my eye was called “Two Woman on the Shore.” I see two distinct women. One woman is very dark and looks evil, kind of like the Grim Reaper, while the other woman is dressed in a white
The image located on page 997 by Jean-Michel Basquiat, Horn Players is an acrylic and oil paintstick on three canvas panels. The artist colored this painting to make a tribute to two legendary African American musicians. This painting features bold colors, fractured figures, and graffiti to capture the dynamic rhythms of jazz and the excitement of New York. The painting is divided into three panels. On both of the end panels, the artist has painted the pictures of the musicians. Also, the painting demonstrates random words which probably has to do with the musicians work perhaps. The painting style is abstract expressionism and art brut which the artist took inspiration from Pablo Picasso. The artists used bold colors on the black background.
In the scene where Theo is escaping with Kee in a wheelchair through the ruined streets, the camera focuses on the main story, following Theo and Kee running for safety, but is preoccupied and caught by a woman in the background cradling her dead son on the ground. This image can also be referenced as a citation to a piece of art previously mentioned in the “Ark of the Arts” scene as Michelangelo’s La Pietà. The image of the mother holding her son is attributing to the statue with Mary holding the recently crucified Jesus Christ, drawing on the similar question regarding the cruelty of men. This image also invokes Picasso’s Guernica, also previously seen in the “Arts Scene”, which depicts a woman crying out as she holds her dead child in the lower left hand corner, which is sectioned off and highlighted in one of the shots from the scene. While the “Ark of the Arts” scene shows the extracted art placed in a symbolic ivory tower, Cuarón puts art back on the ground where it belongs and brings it alive through ancient and current contexts as well as a background for the main
The first painting I am choosing to write about is Jean-Baptiste-Camille-Corot’s painting that was created in 1827 called, Trinita dei Monti. This painting has an old rustic/vintage look to it. This looks like an old Roman city on the coast. The colors in this painting are faded which I think make this painting more appealing and brings this painting to life. The old white building stands out right away which is in the center of this painting which looks like a church. You can see a bunch of other buildings around the harbor near the church and those buildings get smaller the further you go, as they would in pictures taken with cameras or in person. There is also what appears to be a little trail or a courtyard with a bunch of trees lined up
What is most intriguing about this painting is that nearly every figure in the painting is said to represent a famous scholar or philosopher throughout history. Although Raphael did not directly claim that any specific person was represented, the allusions are clear. The two men in the
1880) by Jehan Georges Vibert. I chose this piece because the details are so detailed. What I mean by this is that the carpet is painted perfectly, the walls looks as if it has actual texture in the painting, and how the artist painted this piece is just beautiful. In the center stands two men sitting by a cylinder table. The man in the pink looks intrigued from the man in the red who is talking to him. This is a polychromatic painting, meaning that it is multicolor. This painting looks realistic and is asymmetrical. As a child under the orders of his maternal grandfather, Vibert began painting at a young age.
This artwork is very different from the previous one. It is done by the Warli tribe. Usually warli paintings are done by women. There is less nature and more humanity in this painting and there are only 2 colors. The style is completely different as
The painting was of a river flowing from a lake, surrounded by very tall grass. On each side of the river there are people standing. What was interesting is they were painted all black. They looked like shaded figures. They were all shaped differently but you can tell they were all men. On the top left side of the river there were five men. On the right bottom side of the river there were four men. On each side it looked as though the men were trying to cross over to the other side. They looked tired and scared. It looked as though they were hiding, and getting across the river was the only way to get to that safe haven.