Last Child In The Woods Saving Our Children By Richard Louv Analysis

1356 Words3 Pages

Society Changes Its View on Nature
Richard Louv’s, “Introduction from Last Child in the Woods,” was the article chosen for analysis (Phillips, 2012, pp.434-434). It appears in, A Purposeful Argument: A Practical Guide. It came from the book, “Last Child in the Woods: Saving Our Children” (Louv, 2005).
Louv argued, that children growing up in today’s society, are worse off than past generations. Granted, the article was written from a baby boomers point of view. The introduction from, “Last Child in the Woods: Saving Our Children,” was emotionally manipulative and had poor credibility.
To summarize, the article discussed the change in children’s outlook on nature. Past generations are highlighted, for their close-knit relationship, with …show more content…

Take the Goodwille public school, for example. The school has been a part of the Forest Hills public school district, since 1999. Its primary focus has been, to incorporate the environment into a child’s education. The following statement was pulled from their website, and discussed that the main goal of the schools was to, “use a natural setting to generate an environment that will allow students to feel connected to the natural world” (Goodwillie, 2014). That public school, has dedicated its entire education, to allowing children to feel comfortable with nature. It has not wanted children to fear it, but actually enjoy …show more content…

There were also fewer things to do for fun, back then, so the children made their own fun. The main entertainment of the day was when they played outside, and it was something they looked forward to. It made sense that their relationship with the outdoors was different, when it was compared to children's current forms of entertainment. Nowadays, it is far more complex, due to the advancement of technology.
The last claim Louv made, was that, “rapidly advancing technologies are blurring the lines between humans and nature” (Phillips, 2012, p. 433). He then went on to say, that those circumstances, were the opposite during his childhood. He pointed out that human possibilities have currently been limited. Technology has taught people that they are naturally inferior, without its assistance. It has negatively affected children.
The claim, he used, was focused around, the pathos argument. He said that technology was to blame for children's lack luster bond with nature. Luckily, his generation did not have to deal with the negative effects of technology. He made the lasting impression that people from his generation were better. Unfortunatley, that caused him to come across as being

Open Document