The Last Child In The Woods Analysis

636 Words2 Pages

As technology moves forward, previous generations feel left behind and nostalgic with the ever increasing advances of it. The Last Child in the Woods is an essay written by Richard Louv expressing his lament over technology apparently replacing nature the way it was when he was a child. He uses pathos, anecdotes, and diction choice to share his nostalgia and worry for the way car rides used to be and the way they are now. Louv starts with an example of just how far technology has advanced today by opening this passage with news of an experiment at the State University of New York where “Researchers...are experimenting with a genetic technology through which they can choose the colors that appear on butterfly wings.” He does this to introduce the idea that maybe technology is going too far for its own good into nature. From there Louv begins into the subject of how humans alter nature for advertisement, claiming that this creation of “synthetic nature is the irrelevance of true nature -- the certainty that it’s not even worth looking at.” By juxtaposing the terms ‘synthetic nature’ and ‘’true’’ nature, Louv’s wording evokes a sense of fakeness and oddity in the reader, even guilt regarding He brings up the example, “Why do so many Americans say they want their children to watch less TV, yet continue to expand the opportunities for them to watch it?” This not only points out the original thread of thinking he was raised on clashing with society’s norms today, it also brings into play his use of rhetorical questions. By using rhetorical questions such as the one previously stated as well as, “More importantly, why do so many people no longer consider the physical world worth watching?” This continues to reinforce his use of the guilty tone to make readers reflect on how technology is replacing

Open Document