King Tutankhamun's Funerary Masks

1196 Words3 Pages

Funerary Rituals
How can we tell what is necessary to accompany a culture’s deceased to the afterlife? Simple, by investigating whatever was left behind for the living to find, though this is technically disturbing the graves and it would be considered grave robbing. Though the point stands, with the discovery of King Tutankhamun’s funerary mask modern day society was finally able to see how ancient Egyptians honored their royals. Then there is the mask of Agamemnon, despite its authenticity being questioned, it was still discovered within a tomb of multiple deceased warriors which helped archeologists understand the Mycenaean culture. Both of these pieces, as well as the tombs, gives us the insight towards what was considered normal for funerary practices, but the royalty or higher powered individuals seemed to be the only ones able to do these extravagant “future” burial sites. Despite the fact that there is still no recipe towards how either one of these cultures preserved their dead, Egypt is the closest that we have towards understanding their funerary practices, but before that they had a strong belief for the soul. Ancient Egyptians believed …show more content…

There may be a middle ground for this, but it does not help the archeologist’s, Heinrich Schliemann, character anymore. Some considered the mask may be authentic, “but that Schliemann quickly subjected it to an overzealous restoration to make the face of “Agamemnon” more heroic and noble.”(Stokstad, 97) Society has seen this sort of restoration happened multiple times in the past and it is all towards the restorer/archeologist’s ego, not towards the path of enlighten knowledge. Though despite Schliemann’s efforts, he still did succeed in one thing, by his attempts, he did still make it seem like a King was buried in the tomb he had unearthed, for this helped society to understand how the Mycenaean’s buried their

Open Document