Keeping Children: The Safeguarding Of Children

2545 Words6 Pages

This essay will discuss the safety of children, and the responsibilities of those involved in keeping them safe. The discussion will also include the different perspectives on the meaning of ‘safe’ and the safeguarding of children. It will address the relative responsibilities of families, practitioners, government and children themselves. Furthermore, it will also discuss the relevant law and policy, taking into consideration the diversity of children. ‘Staying safe’ is a complex notion with varying denotations. It is a broad concept that must look at individual children and their experiences and denotes extensive responsibility for all those involved in caring for children, specifically to provide children with the skills to keep themselves …show more content…

Page 1) and in response to her review into child protection, it was evident that local authorities and practitioners had a commitment to learn and a will to improve their practice with children. It is fundamental to this process of change that the voice of the child is heard throughout, and that they are provided with the opportunity to share their views and experiences. This will in turn assist to shape a future system that is more child-centred. Children and young people are best protected when professionals have a clear understanding of what is expected of them by both policy and procedure and the core legislation. In addition, when procedural safeguards are in place to support and protect the decisions and actions of the practitioners. Safeguarding children continues to be a challenging practice area and as highlighted in the Munro Review, information sharing and working together are crucial to enable this. The introduction of the Multi-Agency Safeguarding Hub (MASH) and the support it offers to partnership working through co-location of agencies has given evidence of reduced barriers and increased information …show more content…

Laissez faire and patriarchy, which supports minimal state intervention and the preservation of family life, state paternalism and child protection, supporting extensive local authority intervention with a role of removing children from an inadequate home life, parental rights placing a focus on early intervention with preventative and supportive measures, and children’s rights which considers children as having full rights with emphasis on their wishes and feelings (Fox Harding, 1997). This in itself is open to various debates. Children’s rights are underpinned by existing frameworks such as the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child (UNCRC). Article 54 highlights the child’s right to protection and participation, and local authorities and practitioners are obliged to ensure compliance with this. The dominant hypothesis within society is that the upbringing of children is significantly a matter for parents. However, it may be argued that the state has greater power in this role, for they dictate the legal responsibility of parents (CA 1989, s2) as well as having a duty (s47) and power (s44) to intervene when there are concerns over the welfare of a child. Debatably, there will always be a challenge between providing a laissez faire approach of preventative early intervention, and state paternalism of protecting a child from significant harm by removal from

Open Document