Jonathan Coleman Toulmin Model Example

The Use of the Toulmin Model
When writing a valid argumentative paper, it is important to have all of the necessary parts to make it successful. The Toulmin Model is a method proposed by Stephen Toulmin in which the paper encompasses integral parts of an argument. The Toulmin Model consists of a seven step process to project the argument within the article. The steps used include: the claim, the stated reasons, grounds, the warrant, backing, the conditions of rebuttal, and the qualifier. The use of these steps in your essay can make your argument effective when trying to get your point across. The author, Jonathan Coleman, uses the Toulmin Model in his article, “Is Technology Making Us Intimate Strangers?” Coleman’s article will be used as

The warrant is not stated in the argument, more so, it is what you interpret from the main idea. In Coleman’s article his warrant would be something along the lines off, the use of technology draws our attention away from humanity and we should be engaged in the connection with people and life.. Grounds are evidence of the stated reasons as to backing is with the warrant. Backing is the evidence that supports the warrant. The example that Coleman used for backing was how some people are too busy on their electronic devices to notice the little things in life like “. . .[how] the light hits the magnificent public library at a particular time . . .” (Coleman 484). Without the warrant and grounds, then there would not be statement for the claim to be made.
It’s imperative to understand the oppositions beliefs in an argument. Without doing so, the audience may feel as though your argument is not fair. After stating the ideas that the opposition’s may have, you would propose reasons on why they were wrong. Usually, rebuttals are found more towards the end of the argument after the author stated the claim and warrant, but it can be placed anywhere. There are some arguments that do not contain all of the steps in Toulmin Model. It is unfortunate that Coleman did not include the conditions of the rebuttal in his