Permissive Parenting: Ineffectiveness and Alternatives

573 Words2 Pages

John Rosemond believes that permissive parenting is ineffective. John Rosemond attempted to teach parents to control their children by either trying to think for children and leave them thoughtless, or physically and verbally restraining them. For example, he suggested that children have the right to hear their parents say “No” at least three times a day and the right to hear their parents say “Because I said so” on a regular and frequent basis. The strict parents with undeniable objections would really pressure the children and cause them lifelong psychological damage. Instead, parents should patiently explain or demonstrate the reason why what their children has done is not allowed. Parents should let them know and understand what the consequences are, but only if their behaviours are being unacceptable. But making the children comprehend the parents’ thinking aren’t enough; otherwise, why couldn’t the children be disobedient and have their own space for self-thinkings? Even though it is the parents’ job to decide what …show more content…

I believe that the children should have the right to be their own open creative and independent thinkers; they also need to learn communication skills, so to have their feelings and thinkings fully expressed to people around them, especially their parents. Their parents should also respect them and listen to what they have to say. So they can view you as a role model and treat you like you are the person that they should lean on and learn from. So, I disagree with the point saying that children have the right to find out early that their parents care deeply for them but don’t give a hoot what their children think about them at any given moment in time. Parents really play an important role in life and the parents are the people who intangibly build up their characteristics as human and eventually help shape them as what they will be in the

Open Document